QNT / The Verdict
QNT sits at $60.33 with RSI 32.4, but the bearish structure still points lower
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-01 01:35 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A+
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 4 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained move above $60.56 with RSI(14) reclaiming 50 would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $59.41 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, RSI 32.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, RSI 32. Key support to defend sits near $59.41. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: QNT is 13.8% below its SMA200 and only 1.5% above the 60-day low. But RSI at 32.4 and a contracting MACD histogram say the selling engine is losing torque, while fear at 27 is already broadcasting the bad news. The Fusion Rollup launch across 74 blockchains gives this battered chart a legitimate match near $59.41.
Leo, RSI 32.4 is not a floor; it is a receipt for damage. Your $59.41 cushion is barely 92 cents, and QNT remains below every major moving average, with the 30-day loss at 10.7%. A launch headline cannot erase a price that is still 20.3% beneath the 60-day high.
· oversold rebound from RSI 32.4
· Fusion Rollup catalyst
· Bitcoin recovery despite choppy August
Invalidation: A sustained move above $60.56 with RSI(14) reclaiming 50 would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, the 60-day high at $75.73 is irrelevant overhead if exhaustion is the present fact. A contracting -0.2442 MACD histogram and RSI 32.4 make another straight-line collapse less compelling.
Leo, exhaustion without reversal is just a slower descent. QNT is still 8.6% below SMA50 and 13.8% below SMA200; the chart has not earned your rebound story.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(6)
Mara, the 60-day high at $75.73 is irrelevant overhead if exhaustion is the present fact. A contracting -0.2442 MACD histogram and RSI 32.4 make another straight-line collapse less compelling.
Leo, exhaustion without reversal is just a slower descent. QNT is still 8.6% below SMA50 and 13.8% below SMA200; the chart has not earned your rebound story.
I’m siding with the bear on crowd behavior: taker buy/sell is 0.83, so aggressive flow is still net offer-heavy. Fear at 27 may be crowded, but long accounts at 54.1% show the crowd is not cleanly washed out.
The macro tape gives neither side a free pass: Bitcoin’s monthly gain is intact, yet August is labeled choppy after forced selling. In that liquidity-sensitive backdrop, QNT sitting 1.5% above $59.41 is a thin ledge.
Thin ledges can still launch rebounds, Dmitri. The prior settled record shows the underweight call won once at -4.5% versus BTC, but the next two calls were pushes at -0.9% and -2.0%—momentum is fading.
And that record still contains no losing directional call. The evidence is not a rebound; it is a bear thesis that has yet to be disproven.
I rule for the bearish side. The decisive exhibit is QNT’s alignment below SMA20, SMA50 and SMA200, reinforced by a 10.7% 30-day decline and taker buy/sell of 0.83. This ruling is overturned by a sustained break back above $60.56 accompanied by RSI reclaiming 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: RSI(14) 32.4; price below SMA20, SMA50 and SMA200 by 4.5%, 8.6% and 13.8%; bearish SMA50/SMA200 spread of -5.7%; 7d and 30d losses of 4.6% and 10.7%. Conflicts: MACD histogram is contracting at -0.2442 and RSI is near oversold territory. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear & Greed at 27; taker buy/sell at 0.83; long accounts at 54.1% with an L/S ratio of 1.18; StockTwits had 0 bullish versus 1 bearish message. Conflicts: fear is already elevated, and the modest long skew is not extreme. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh here: the headline tape offers a real catalyst—Quant’s Fusion Rollup reportedly went live across 74 blockchains for institutions—but the surrounding coverage is mostly price forecasts and supply narratives. Bitcoin’s August outlook is described as choppy after forced selling eased, while QNT still trades only 1.5% above its 60-day low.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand here: institutional interoperability is the constructive fundamental thread, with Fusion Rollup cited as unifying 74 blockchains. The data pack supplies no token-supply, revenue, valuation, or adoption figures, so fundamentals cannot overrule the plainly weak market structure.
717768f14a179eb0fc5b4560cd8be0880f83b270216aa57e11936e42d17a92c8Not yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-07-31 · 2026-07-30 · 2026-07-29 · 2026-07-28 · 2026-07-27 · 2026-07-26 · 2026-07-24 · 2026-07-23