QNT / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
QNT at $63.18 is pressing higher, but the -9.3% SMA50/SMA200 spread keeps the verdict underweight
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-27 02:20 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -7.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -3.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -10.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -8.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 4 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above the $69.10 60-day high.. Cautious read: a break below $60.00 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, calling a 9.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, calling a 9. Key support to defend sits near $60.00. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
Mara, the strongest bear number is the SMA50 sitting 9.3% below the SMA200, and I’ll grant that’s an ugly long-term silhouette. But QNT is already 7.6% below the SMA200 while trading 4.7% above the SMA20, with RSI at 55.2 and 30-day performance at +4.2%—the old damage is visible, while the tape is repairing.
Leo, calling a 9.3% bearish moving-average spread “old damage” is hopium wearing a pocket watch. Your repair thesis rests on a modest +4.2% monthly rise and a contracting MACD histogram at +0.6368, while price still sits $5.92 below the $69.10 60-day high.
I think the bullish repair has more room than the ruling admits: QNT is only 8.7% below $69.10, trades 4.7% above SMA20, and RSI at 55.2 is not overheated. The fragile bear exhibit is the lagging -9.3% SMA50/SMA200 spread.
The fastest failure is a retreat through $60, because the market is already greedy at 71 while taker buy/sell is 0.96 and the 60-day low sits at $55.36. The settled record also shows five WIN underweight calls and no LOSS in the shown window, so dismissing the bearish structure has a poor recent precedent.
Leo overreaches by treating +4.2% over 30 days as a trend reversal; Mara overreaches only if she treats missing funding data as bearish confirmation. The deciding condition is whether QNT reclaims $69.10 or instead loses $60 on weakening momentum.
· short-term repair toward $69.10
· greed-driven continuation despite soft taker flow
· unverified funding and liquidity conditions
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above the $69.10 60-day high.
Mara, the 60-day high is 8.7% away, not a distant galaxy; a move back toward $69.10 needs only continuation of the current short-term structure.
Leo, and the 60-day low is $55.36—14.0% below—so the chart offers materially more air beneath today’s $63.18 than above it.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day high is 8.7% away, not a distant galaxy; a move back toward $69.10 needs only continuation of the current short-term structure.
Leo, and the 60-day low is $55.36—14.0% below—so the chart offers materially more air beneath today’s $63.18 than above it.
Leo, I’m not seeing a clean demand surge: long accounts are 55.5%, but taker buy/sell is 0.96. Greed at 71 with sub-one taker flow is a rather comic version of bullish confirmation.
Mara, your downside map is technically cleaner, but the pack gives me no verified funding rate or liquidity shock. I’ll keep the macro bear case alive, not pretend it has an exhibit it doesn’t.
I rule for the bear side: QNT is underweight, and the decisive exhibit is the SMA50/SMA200 spread at -9.3%, reinforced by price remaining 7.6% below the SMA200. This ruling is overturned by a sustained break above the $69.10 60-day high or a clear reversal of the bearish moving-average structure.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see short-term support: RSI is 55.2, price sits 4.7% above SMA20 and 1.9% above SMA50, while MACD histogram is positive at +0.6368. But QNT remains 7.6% below SMA200 and the SMA50 is 9.3% under SMA200; direction: bearish; evidence families: moving averages, RSI, MACD, multi-horizon returns; conflicts: short-term momentum versus long-term trend; sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I read greed at 71, with 55.5% of long accounts and an L/S ratio of 1.24. Yet taker buy/sell is only 0.96, a small but telling refusal to chase; direction: bearish; evidence families: Fear&Greed, account skew, L/S ratio, taker flow; conflicts: greedy headline mood versus softer taker demand; sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The local headlines are mostly price pages and promotional research, not a fresh QNT catalyst. The SEC custody-rule story and Nvidia's earnings strength may shape the wider crypto risk tape, but neither directly repairs QNT's long-term chart.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The pack offers a Coin Bureau review describing Quant as an interoperable blockchain OS and a CryptoRank long-range prediction feature, but no fresh revenue, adoption, supply, or valuation figures. That leaves the fundamental case narrative-led rather than numerically reinforced.
0d7c3d2b41cb339bb2d630d6b79f37f0e480dc9ea6dad8e28beb10cec2c4511f64bb1ee510b85abc06eb9d0328d74bef4839ac43e76e5a63e96f0ad2d0a0301eCommitted 2026-08-28T00:20:00+00:00 · 93 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23