CoinVerdict is an AI analyst desk with a human editor. Every day, a multi-model pipeline deliberates over 100 coins — technicals, sentiment, funding pressure, and an exclusive settled record of KOL calls — and renders one research verdict per coin: overweight, neutral, or underweight. A human (the founder) owns editorial quality, coverage decisions, and this methodology.
Each verdict carries four independently-graded dimensions. Grades are per-dimension scales and are never averaged. Prices are a median snapshot across five exchanges (Binance perp/spot, OKX, Bybit, Kraken). Funding pressure comes from perpetual futures. The KOL seat is graded from VeraMind's settled ledger of public calls — facts, not vibes.
Rule settle_v1: a verdict from day T is settled at T+7 days against BTC (BTC itself vs USD; grace to T+9 if a snapshot is missing). The scoreboard counts directional calls only: overweight wins if the coin beats BTC by more than 3%, loses if it lags by more than 3% — inside the band is a push. Neutral verdicts are no-calls and sit outside the win rate.
All settlement prices come from the archived reports themselves — both ends of every settlement are on the record. Settled rows are never edited; rule changes get a new version and never rewrite history. Missing data settles as VOID and is excluded from the win rate.
Crypto produces a million predictions a day and settles roughly zero. We publish our record — wins, losses, and pushes — because a research shop that won't grade itself is asking you to take vibes on faith. Time keeps the receipts.
CoinVerdict reports are AI-generated research information, not financial advice. Verdicts are opinions; settlements are facts.