QNT / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
QNT at $62.855 sits 8.0% below SMA200 as the longer trend outweighs a 53.9 RSI
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-28 02:12 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -7.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -3.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -10.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -8.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 4 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained move above the data-pack resistance at $69.1 invalidates the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $60.00 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, the positive MACD print is contracting, while the 7-day tape is already down 5.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, the positive MACD print is contracting, while the 7-day tape is already down 5. Key support to defend sits near $60.00. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: QNT is 8.0% under SMA200 and the SMA50 trails it by 9.4%. But RSI at 53.9 is nowhere near washed out, MACD remains positive at +0.5026, and the 30-day return is still +3.6%—that’s a damaged engine, not a wreck.
Leo, the positive MACD print is contracting, while the 7-day tape is already down 5.8%. Your +3.6% over 30 days is precisely the kind of stale bounce that gets mistaken for a trend change when price remains below $69.1 resistance and the bearish MA structure is intact.
I think the downside has more room than the ruling admits: QNT is only 9.2% below $69.1 but already carries Greed at 73, while the 7-day return is -5.8%. The fastest repricing could target the $55.36 low if bullish crowding loses its footing.
The fragile exhibit is the bearish moving-average structure: it can lag a genuine reversal, especially with RSI at 53.9 and MACD histogram still positive at +0.5026. A clean break above $69.1 would make this call blow up quickly.
The aggressive desk overreaches on the depth of the downside; $55.36 is 13.3% away and no funding data confirms crowded excess. The deciding condition is whether QNT reclaims $69.1 or instead loses $60, while the six WIN and zero LOSS underweight calls in the settled record favor respecting the bearish read.
· positive MACD reversal
· Fusion Rollup institutional adoption
· break above $69.1
Invalidation: A sustained move above the data-pack resistance at $69.1 invalidates the bearish ruling.
Mara, QNT is only 9.2% below the 60-day high of $69.1, so the recovery zone is close enough to matter; the market hasn’t buried the asset.
Close to resistance isn’t support, Leo. Price at $62.855 is still 13.3% above the $55.36 60-day low, leaving plenty of air beneath a market with Greed at 73.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, QNT is only 9.2% below the 60-day high of $69.1, so the recovery zone is close enough to matter; the market hasn’t buried the asset.
Close to resistance isn’t support, Leo. Price at $62.855 is still 13.3% above the $55.36 60-day low, leaving plenty of air beneath a market with Greed at 73.
Leo’s crowd point is backwards: 53.8% of long accounts and a 1.17 ratio show bullish skew, but taker buy/sell at 0.97 says demand is not pressing through. That’s soft participation, not hidden fuel.
And the macro tape offers no rescue in this pack. Without a direct QNT catalyst beyond the Fusion Rollup headline, the asset remains tied to a liquidity regime the data does not show improving.
I rule for the bear side: QNT’s bearish SMA structure is the decisive exhibit, with SMA50 9.4% below SMA200 and price 8.0% beneath SMA200. The ruling is overturned by a sustained move above the $69.1 60-day high, or strengthened decisively by a break below $60 support.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
The chart is split, but the heavy side is bearish: QNT trades 8.0% below SMA200, while SMA50 sits 9.4% below SMA200. RSI at 53.9 and MACD histogram at +0.5026 show short-term stabilization, yet the 7-day loss of 5.8% keeps the tape vulnerable.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Greed is elevated at 73, and long accounts lead at 53.8% with a 1.17 long/short ratio. Taker buy/sell at 0.97 fails to confirm aggressive demand, so the crowd is leaning bullish without strong execution behind it.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The constructive headline is Quant’s Fusion Rollup reportedly going live across 74 blockchains for institutions. The broader market headlines concern Kalshi litigation and Ethena’s token outlook, offering no direct QNT catalyst strong enough to repair the chart.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The 74-blockchain Fusion Rollup story supports Quant’s interoperability narrative and institutional relevance. But the data pack supplies no fresh QNT valuation, revenue, adoption, or token-supply figures, so fundamentals cannot overrule the bearish moving-average structure.
cde9c68e823c83b4f3b8afef365695b0e11d5016315964391110a7021afaaf44b460912c22e647ff99deef7428c2f0098da84f163350ba433a36d11ce82e7419Committed 2026-08-29T00:20:00+00:00 · 98 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23