QNT / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
QNT’s 17.4% seven-day surge meets a bearish long-term structure
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-25 02:30 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bullish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -7.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -3.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -10.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -8.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 4 exchanges
Invalidation: A daily close below $60.00 overturns the constructive recovery case and shifts the verdict bearish.. Cautious read: a break below $60.00 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that “rear-view mirror” is the road map: price is still 4.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Neutral, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that “rear-view mirror” is the road map: price is still 4. Key support to defend sits near $60.00. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: SMA50 sits 9.1% below SMA200. But that’s rear-view-mirror damage; QNT is 9.1% above SMA20, MACD histogram is +1.044 and the coin has ripped 17.4% in seven days, putting the $69.10 ceiling within 5.2%.
Leo, that “rear-view mirror” is the road map: price is still 4.0% below SMA200, and the 9.1% SMA50/SMA200 gap says the larger trend hasn’t healed. RSI at 61.7 and Fear&Greed at 74 show a chase with room to disappoint, not a clean breakout.
· rejection at $69.10 resistance
· Greed at 74 and 54.9% long-account crowding
· bearish SMA50/SMA200 structure
Invalidation: A daily close below $60.00 overturns the constructive recovery case and shifts the verdict bearish.
Mara, QNT is only 3.58% below the 60-day high, while the 60-day low is 18.4% beneath price. That asymmetry says recovery momentum has the tape’s attention.
Leo, proximity to $69.10 is exactly why it matters: resistance is overhead, not conquered. A 17.4% weekly sprint into Greed at 74 can run out of oxygen before the long-term trend changes.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, QNT is only 3.58% below the 60-day high, while the 60-day low is 18.4% beneath price. That asymmetry says recovery momentum has the tape’s attention.
Leo, proximity to $69.10 is exactly why it matters: resistance is overhead, not conquered. A 17.4% weekly sprint into Greed at 74 can run out of oxygen before the long-term trend changes.
I’m backing Mara on crowding, though the evidence is modest: 54.9% of accounts are long, L/S is 1.22 and taker flow is 1.16. There is no funding-rate reading to prove the crowd is paying an extreme premium.
The Bitcoin move toward $80,000 helps, but the headline itself flags the next pullback as decisive. QNT below SMA200 by 4.0% remains a macro-sensitive fault line.
I rule for the neutral side: the decisive exhibit is the collision between +17.4% seven-day momentum and a SMA50/SMA200 spread of -9.1%. Neither camp earns a clean victory until QNT either clears $69.10 or loses $60.00; a close below $60.00 invalidates the constructive recovery case.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: mixed. Evidence families: RSI at 61.7, MACD histogram +1.044 and price above SMA20 by 9.1% versus price below SMA200 by 4.0%; key levels are $60.00 support area and $69.10 resistance. Conflicts: momentum is advancing while SMA50 sits 9.1% below SMA200 in a bearish structure. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bullish but crowded. Evidence families: Fear&Greed at 74, 54.9% long accounts, L/S ratio 1.22 and taker buy/sell at 1.16. Conflicts: the crowd is leaning bullish after a 17.4% seven-day rise, while funding is unavailable and StockTwits evidence is only 2 bullish versus 0 bearish messages. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Bitcoin reclaiming $80,000 supports a broader crypto-recovery backdrop, but the cited QNT headlines are mostly price pages, prediction content and a general Quant Network review. I see no concrete QNT-specific catalyst in the data pack capable of overruling the chart structure.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The pack offers no fresh QNT token-economics, revenue, adoption or valuation figures. Quant’s interoperability narrative is present through the Coin Bureau review, but it is not quantified here, so fundamentals cannot carry a months-long verdict.
d9cf1e7399ea27cf590ffd0cd34abf6b272c6eb2af42ffc978876fc69aa4e94b14faabecdb7719003b4bda7de235e76e71170edaad505076d223f4a3b6d33cbeCommitted 2026-08-26T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23