QNT / The Verdict
QNT hugs the $58.57 floor while RSI sinks to 32.1
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-04 00:59 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 4 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained move above $60.00 with RSI above 50 would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $58.57 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your “floor” is a price level, not proof of demand; QNT has still failed every major moving average, with SMA50 below SMA200 by 6.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your “floor” is a price level, not proof of demand; QNT has still failed every major moving average, with SMA50 below SMA200 by 6. Key support to defend sits near $58.57. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I concede the ugly headline number: QNT is down 11.9% over 30 days and sits 14.6% beneath its SMA200. But RSI at 32.1 is already pressing into washed-out territory, the MACD histogram is contracting at -0.1565, and price is just 1.6% above $58.57—selling pressure is running into the floor, not open air. The 74-blockchain Fusion Rollup headline gives any rebound a real catalyst rather than pure hopium.
Leo, your “floor” is a price level, not proof of demand; QNT has still failed every major moving average, with SMA50 below SMA200 by 6.1%. RSI at 32.1 describes weakness, not a reversal, while the 60-day high of $73.72 remains 19.2% away. A contracting MACD deficit inside a persistent downtrend is the classic bait for premature optimism.
I think the bearish ruling leaves rebound room underpriced: RSI is 32.1, price is only 1.6% above $58.57, and the MACD histogram has contracted to -0.1565. The 74-blockchain Fusion Rollup narrative could turn a stretched chart quickly.
The fastest failure is a break below $58.57, because that is the nearest concrete structural floor and price is already down 11.9% in 30 days. The fragile exhibit is the oversold RSI reading: 32.1 can stay weak while the moving averages remain decisively bearish.
I think Leo overreached by treating proximity to $58.57 as demand, while Mara overreaches only if she ignores the contracting MACD histogram. The deciding condition is whether QNT holds $58.57 or breaks it; the shown record also favors the bearish side, with 1 WIN and 0 LOSS among settled directional calls.
· oversold rebound from $58.57
· Fusion Rollup adoption catalyst
· tokenised-deposit partnership momentum
Invalidation: A sustained move above $60.00 with RSI above 50 would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, if $58.57 holds, the risk-reward of another leg lower shrinks sharply; the market is already staring at a 60-day low.
Leo, holding one low for one session proves nothing when price remains 9.1% below SMA50 and 14.6% below SMA200.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, if $58.57 holds, the risk-reward of another leg lower shrinks sharply; the market is already staring at a 60-day low.
Leo, holding one low for one session proves nothing when price remains 9.1% below SMA50 and 14.6% below SMA200.
I’ll add the crowd is not aggressively long: only 45.2% of long accounts and an L/S ratio of 0.82. But taker buy/sell at 1.00 shows no meaningful demand impulse either.
And without a liquidity tailwind in the pack, the 19.2% gap to $73.72 is a recovery fantasy, not a macro-supported setup.
I rule bearish, with the bearish moving-average structure as the decisive exhibit: QNT is 14.6% below SMA200 and SMA50 trails SMA200 by 6.1%. The call is overturned by a sustained break above $60.00 accompanied by RSI reclaiming 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: RSI(14) at 32.1; price 4.6% below SMA20, 9.1% below SMA50, and 14.6% below SMA200; bearish SMA50/SMA200 structure; MACD histogram at -0.1565 but contracting. Conflicts: price is only 1.6% above the 60-day low of $58.57 and MACD downside is easing. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear & Greed at 25, long accounts at 45.2%, L/S ratio at 0.82, and taker buy/sell at 1.00. Conflicts: StockTwits shows 2 bullish versus 0 bearish messages, but the sample is only 2 posts. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The constructive headlines are specific—Fusion Rollup reportedly unifies 74 blockchains, while Quant and Dentsu Soken are supporting Japan’s tokenised-deposit adoption. But the data pack offers no quantified revenue, adoption, or valuation impact, so these headlines do not offset QNT’s 11.9% 30-day decline.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: Institutional infrastructure and tokenised-deposit partnerships are credible fundamental narratives, with Fusion Rollup linked to 74 blockchains. The pack supplies no earnings, cash-flow, token-supply, or demand figures, so fundamental conviction is limited and cannot overrule the chart.
ed91010fde290185b5a68a466a22fd33bb4fda0a4cb88e0d11123ce656350261Not yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-02 · 2026-08-01 · 2026-07-31 · 2026-07-30 · 2026-07-29 · 2026-07-28 · 2026-07-27 · 2026-07-26