QNT / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
QNT at $63.56 sits 7.0% below its SMA200 despite RSI 56.4 and an 8.1% seven-day rebound
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-26 02:04 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -7.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -3.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -10.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -8.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 4 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above the $69.10 60-day high.. Cautious read: a break below $60.00 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, the $63.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, the $63. Key support to defend sits near $60.00. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the strongest bear number: QNT remains 7.0% under its SMA200, and the 50/200-day spread is a nasty -9.2%. But price is already climbing back through the nearer averages, up 8.1% in seven days with RSI 56.4—not overheated—and that makes the old bearish structure look stale rather than decisive.
Leo, the $63.56 bounce is exactly the number hopium wants us to worship, but it still sits beneath the SMA200. Your 8.1% rebound has a contracting MACD histogram, a 0.98 taker buy/sell ratio, and a nearby $69.10 ceiling; that’s a rally running into supply, not a repaired trend.
· countertrend breakout above $69.10
· short-term momentum remains positive
· blockchain-infrastructure headlines gain QNT-specific traction
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above the $69.10 60-day high.
Mara, QNT is only 8.1% below the 60-day high, while it’s 14.7% above the 60-day low. That’s recovery structure, not a coin trapped at the floor.
Leo, the same tape is still 7.0% below SMA200 and the SMA50 is 9.2% beneath it. A rebound inside a damaged long trend remains a countertrend bounce.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, QNT is only 8.1% below the 60-day high, while it’s 14.7% above the 60-day low. That’s recovery structure, not a coin trapped at the floor.
Leo, the same tape is still 7.0% below SMA200 and the SMA50 is 9.2% beneath it. A rebound inside a damaged long trend remains a countertrend bounce.
I’m with Mara on participation: 52.7% of accounts are long, but takers lean sellers at 0.98. Greed at 65 gives the crowd more room to be disappointed than surprised.
And the macro headlines are infrastructure plans, not demonstrated QNT cash flow. Without a liquidity impulse or coin-specific adoption metric, the market is pricing a story against a still-bearish moving-average regime.
I rule for the bear side: QNT is underweight because the decisive exhibit is its 7.0% discount to the SMA200, reinforced by the SMA50 sitting 9.2% below it. The call is overturned by a sustained break above $69.10, the 60-day high, or by a clear recovery of the SMA200 trend structure.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a short-term rebound, but the chart is still structurally damaged: QNT trades 7.0% below its SMA200, while SMA50 sits 9.2% below SMA200. RSI 56.4 and MACD histogram +0.7897 show momentum has revived, yet the contracting MACD and $69.10 60-day high leave overhead resistance close.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I read mild greed, not capitulation: Fear & Greed is 65, long accounts are 52.7%, and the long/short ratio is 1.11. Taker buy/sell at 0.98 says buyers lack control, while the single StockTwits message is too thin to matter.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The headlines point toward broader institutional blockchain infrastructure, including planned U.S. state banking-association networks and Zerohash's renewed OCC trust-bank effort. Neither headline directly confirms incremental QNT demand, so the news case is atmosphere rather than a catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Quant's interoperability narrative remains relevant alongside blockchain-network and banking-infrastructure adoption themes. The data pack supplies no QNT-specific revenue, usage, valuation, or token-supply figures, so fundamentals cannot outweigh the chart structure.
593370df12fe391356552a916b8abe628f343698477166b0104d882ef62055a0650479c8d662b50f512b6a5ccfb1242fb411c562a0dabecc0eed582b87132f9fCommitted 2026-08-27T00:20:00+00:00 · 93 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23