QNT / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
QNT’s 7.72% surge reaches $66.89 as MACD expands, but RSI 69.7 tests the rally
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-22 02:23 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bullish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -7.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -3.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -10.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -8.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 4 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained move below $60.00 overturns the bullish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $60.00 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: I’m Mara Frost: Leo’s +16.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bullish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I’m Leo Vance: the bear’s strongest number is the -8. Resistance to clear sits near $70.86. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’m Leo Vance: the bear’s strongest number is the -8.7% SMA50-versus-SMA200 structure, and I concede it. But price is now 12.5% above SMA20, 7-day performance is +16.0%, and MACD is expanding—this looks like a breakout engine waking up, not a stale chart waiting to die.
I’m Mara Frost: Leo’s +16.0% week is exactly the exhibit I attack; it has driven RSI to 69.7 and Fear&Greed to 71. A move still 5.6% below $70.86 has not cleared resistance, while the -8.7% moving-average spread says the underlying trend remains guilty until proven otherwise.
I’m the aggressive desk: upside has more room than the ruling admits because QNT is only 5.6% below $70.86 while 7-day momentum is already +16.0%. If that high breaks, the market’s current 71 Greed reading could still understate continuation rather than mark the end.
I’m the conservative desk: the fastest failure is an RSI-led rejection near $70.86, because RSI is already 69.7 and price remains 2.0% below SMA200. The fragile exhibit is momentum itself; the -8.7% SMA50/SMA200 spread and long tilt at 54.0% leave little room for a clean unwind.
I’m the neutral desk: Mara overreaches by dismissing the +1.191 expanding MACD histogram, while Leo overreaches if he treats +16.0% in seven days as proof of durable trend repair. The deciding condition is whether QNT clears $70.86 or instead loses $60.00; the settled record favors the underweight calls, with 4 WIN and 0 LOSS shown.
· RSI 69.7 and Fear&Greed 71
· Bearish SMA50/SMA200 structure at -8.7%
· Long tilt with 54.0% long accounts
Invalidation: A sustained move below $60.00 overturns the bullish ruling.
Mara, you’re treating the moving averages like a gravestone when price is already 7.4% above SMA50 and MACD histogram is +1.191. The market is repricing faster than your lagging exhibits can register.
Leo, price being 2.0% below SMA200 is not repricing—it’s a failed long-term repair attempt. Until $70.86 gives way, your momentum story is still knocking on a locked door.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating the moving averages like a gravestone when price is already 7.4% above SMA50 and MACD histogram is +1.191. The market is repricing faster than your lagging exhibits can register.
Leo, price being 2.0% below SMA200 is not repricing—it’s a failed long-term repair attempt. Until $70.86 gives way, your momentum story is still knocking on a locked door.
I’m Theo Okafor: the 54.0% long-account share and 1.18 L/S ratio show a mild long tilt, not an extreme one. Taker buy/sell at 1.07 backs demand, though the missing funding rate prevents any claim that crowding is benign.
I’m Dmitri Volkov: a 71 Greed reading makes liquidity-sensitive upside vulnerable to a crypto-wide reversal. QNT can run toward $70.86, but the 60-day low at $55.36 shows how much air sits beneath the excitement.
I’m Judge Aldrich: the bullish side wins on the decisive exhibit—MACD histogram expansion to +1.191 alongside price 12.5% above SMA20. The ruling is overturned by a close below $60.00, which would signal that the momentum impulse has failed before resistance at $70.86 is reclaimed.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I’m Kai Nakamura: bullish momentum has price 12.5% above SMA20 and MACD histogram expanding to +1.191. But $66.89 remains 5.6% below the $70.86 60-day high, while the bearish SMA50/SMA200 structure at -8.7% argues this is a rally inside a damaged medium-term trend.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m Sofia Reyes: bullish crowd evidence includes Fear&Greed at 71, a 1.18 long/short ratio, 54.0% long accounts, and a 1.07 taker buy/sell ratio. That enthusiasm is also the trap: three bullish StockTwits messages versus zero bearish, with no funding-rate data to confirm whether crowded longs are being paid to persist.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m Ed Walsh: the most substantive QNT-specific headline is Fusion Rollup going live across 74 blockchains for institutions. The broader crypto headlines—Illinois digital-asset-tax litigation and the Clarity Act—are sector-level catalysts, not direct proof of QNT demand.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I’m Priya Anand: the 74-blockchain institutional interoperability narrative supports QNT’s utility case. The pack provides no fresh revenue, adoption, supply, or valuation figures, so fundamentals support the story but cannot independently establish fair value.
e6db73e9c001ba884994cdfd6807565501d610cc89eabec5b67b7624edba946f4dce84591bab17edc3dcb06a2ee866c2e70ff75132d5ba0582c8c8ce8beda186Committed 2026-08-23T00:20:00+00:00 · 94 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23