SUI / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
Greed hits 73 while price sits 10.3% below the 200-day SMA, a classic divergence before the rug gets pulled.
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-09-05 01:07 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
Bullish
B
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — -1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -8.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -13.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — -11.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Neutral — -2.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -7.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +4.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -8.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Neutral — -3.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — +0.4% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A daily close above 0.9555 invalidates the bearish structural view.. Cautious read: a break below $0.634 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: You're celebrating a +13.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: You're celebrating a +13. Key support to defend sits near $0.634. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I know the 200-day SMA is dragging 10.3% overhead, Mara, but that gap is exactly why this is a coiled spring. The 30-day return is +13.7% despite the gloom, and with price holding 1.4% above the 20-day SMA, the dip buyers are clearly defending this level aggressively.
You're celebrating a +13.7% monthly gain while the long/short ratio sits at 2.20? That isn't strength, Leo, that's a crowded trade waiting for a pin to prick it. The 60-day high at 0.9555 is miles away, and with Greed at 73, there is no marginal buyer left to push us there.
The bears are underestimating the 30-day +13.7% momentum; if we reclaim the 0.7675 daily high, the short squeeze from that 2.20 L/S ratio could drive this to 0.80 faster than the SMA200 matters.
The fastest way this blows up is if the 60-day low at 0.634 breaks; with the 50-day SMA 15.1% below the 200-day, a failure here triggers a structural trend continuation that ignores the short-term optimism.
Mara overreached by dismissing the 20-day SMA support, but Leo is ignoring the risk of the 0.634 level. The condition is simple: hold above 0.754 to keep the bulls alive, or the bears take control.
· Crowded longs at 2.20 ratio
· Price 10.3% below major SMA resistance
· Extreme Greed at 73
Invalidation: A daily close above 0.9555 invalidates the bearish structural view.
You ignore the taker buy/sell ratio of 0.91, Mara—that shows sellers are aggressive, not buyers trapped. If the longs were truly crowded, we'd see buying pressure, not this grind.
A 0.91 taker ratio with a 2.20 long ratio means they are selling into the bid, Leo. They aren't shorting; they are longs looking for the exit door before the 60-day low at 0.634 gets tested.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
You ignore the taker buy/sell ratio of 0.91, Mara—that shows sellers are aggressive, not buyers trapped. If the longs were truly crowded, we'd see buying pressure, not this grind.
A 0.91 taker ratio with a 2.20 long ratio means they are selling into the bid, Leo. They aren't shorting; they are longs looking for the exit door before the 60-day low at 0.634 gets tested.
I'd usually back the crowd, but without funding rates, I can't confirm if these longs are paying a premium. However, a 68.7% long account share at these levels is historically a fragility signal, not a strength one.
Funding or not, price is up 2.6% over 7 days. The market is absorbing the supply, and you're all staring at the lagging SMA200 instead of the momentum building under the 20-day SMA.
I'm siding with the bears here. The structural weight of the 200-day SMA combined with a Greed reading of 73 creates a setup where the downside is simply more probable than the breakout. We are underweight until the crowd clears out.
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
1 of 6 settled KOL calls disagreed with our same-day verdict.
Same yardstick for everyone — Wilson 95% CI, settled facts only. KOL outcomes are transcribed from VeraMind's ledger, not re-graded. · Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Price action hovers 5.7% above the 50-day SMA but remains trapped 10.3% under the 200-day SMA, keeping the broader structure bearish despite short-term strength. RSI at 53.9 is neutral, but the 15.1% gap between the 50 and 200 SMAs suggests any rally hits a concrete ceiling fast.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Fear & Greed at 73 signals extreme complacency, matching a long/short ratio of 2.20 that is heavily skewed to the bullish side. This kind of crowding usually precedes a flush, especially with taker buy/sell at 0.91 showing selling pressure into the bids.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Headlines are recycling the same 'routine pullback' narrative while outlets pump $2 price targets, which is often contrarian signal fuel for distribution. Market context shows large caps dropping, implying Sui's current stability is fragile relative to the broader sector bleed.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Tokenomics data is absent from the pack, preventing a full on-chain valuation assessment. Without unlock schedules or staking yield data, we rely strictly on price structure and derivatives behavior.
5110dd624c5047434c0230a5cfae06e5f25463587339eed52549af0d9c586d104910750d35ef228ada15e5324d077ec5e03b15a767441cb6079eaf80baffe165Committed 2026-09-06T00:20:00+00:00 · 76 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25