SUI / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SUI’s 73.0 greed reading and 71.0% long accounts make the 0.8316 rebound look crowded
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-24 00:48 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
Bullish
B
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -13.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — -11.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Neutral — -2.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -7.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +4.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -8.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Neutral — -3.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — +0.4% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained close above 0.9555 would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.634 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: I’m Mara Frost: Leo’s 23.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I’m Mara Frost: Leo’s 23. Key support to defend sits near $0.634. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’m Leo Vance, and I’ll concede the sharpest bear number: 71.0% of accounts are long while the taker buy/sell ratio is only 0.92. But SUI has still gained 23.3% in seven days and trades 16.4% above its SMA20; that crowding can be stale fuel after a breakout, while ETF staking rewards add a fresh ignition source. My prior underweight calls on August 8 and August 7 lost as SUI beat BTC by 4.7% and 3.8%, so the tape has already punished premature pessimism.
I’m Mara Frost: Leo’s 23.3% seven-day surge is precisely the exhibit I attack—it is extended price, not proof of durable demand. RSI is already 67.2, MACD histogram has contracted to +0.02066, takers lean bearish at 0.92, and the coin remains 3.8% below SMA200 with SMA50 16.8% beneath it. The August 8 and August 7 underweight calls lost, yes, but that does not convert today’s crowded rally into a repaired trend.
I’m more bullish than the ruling: SUI is only 12.9% below 0.9555 after a 23.3% seven-day gain, and ETF staking rewards could make that resistance underpriced. The August 8 and August 7 underweight calls lost by 4.7% and 3.8% versus BTC, showing how much upside can remain when momentum accelerates.
I’m more defensive: the fastest failure is a reversal from 0.8316 while RSI is 67.2 and 71.0% of accounts are long. The fragile exhibit is the ETF headline, because Binance’s planned delisting of seven spot pairs including SUI and the 0.92 taker buy/sell ratio point toward thinner demand than the narrative implies.
I’m the neutral desk: Leo overreaches by treating a 23.3% seven-day move as fresh fuel, while Mara overreaches if she dismisses the ETF catalyst outright. The deciding condition is whether price can sustain a move above 0.9555; until then, the 3.8% discount to SMA200 and crowded longs favor the ruling.
· ETF staking-reward demand accelerates
· short-term momentum extends from +23.3% over seven days
· crowding metrics reverse without price damage
Invalidation: A sustained close above 0.9555 would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, the market is not trading at the 60-day low of 0.634; it is at 0.8316 and only 12.9% below 0.9555. A move toward that high needs less imagination than your structural-break story.
Leo, being 12.9% below resistance is not a catalyst; it is overhead supply. With 71.0% longs and a 2.45 ratio, a failed push can unwind faster than ETF headlines can circulate.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the market is not trading at the 60-day low of 0.634; it is at 0.8316 and only 12.9% below 0.9555. A move toward that high needs less imagination than your structural-break story.
Leo, being 12.9% below resistance is not a catalyst; it is overhead supply. With 71.0% longs and a 2.45 ratio, a failed push can unwind faster than ETF headlines can circulate.
I’m Theo Okafor: the 0.92 taker buy/sell ratio is the cleaner flow clue, and it cuts against the bullish account skew. Without funding data, nobody gets to call the crowd’s carry cheap or expensive.
I’m Dmitri Volkov: the macro tape is offering no SUI-specific liquidity proof. A 0.8316 price above short averages can still be a countertrend rally while SMA50 remains 16.8% below SMA200.
I’m Judge Aldrich: the bearish side wins. The decisive exhibit is the combination of 71.0% long accounts, a 2.45 ratio, and a 0.92 taker buy/sell reading against a still-bearish long-term moving-average structure. This ruling is different from the August 8 and August 7 losses because today’s pack shows explicit crowding, contracting MACD, and a price still below SMA200; a sustained close above 0.9555 invalidates my call.
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Same yardstick for everyone — Wilson 95% CI, settled facts only. KOL outcomes are transcribed from VeraMind's ledger, not re-graded. · Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I’m Kai Nakamura: Direction: mixed. Evidence families: RSI 67.2, price +16.4% versus SMA20, +15.6% versus SMA50, MACD histogram +0.02066, and 60-day range levels. Conflicts: price remains 3.8% below SMA200, SMA50 sits 16.8% below SMA200, and MACD momentum is contracting. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m Sofia Reyes: Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear&Greed 73, 71.0% long accounts with a 2.45 long/short ratio, taker buy/sell at 0.92, and StockTwits at 9 bullish versus 2 bearish. Conflicts: the 24-hour move is only +0.7% despite strongly bullish crowd labeling. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m Ed Walsh: SUI ETF launches with staking rewards are constructive, but the headline tape is not clean: Binance plans to delist seven spot pairs including SUI, while one forecast flags a likely 15% drop despite the Tether partnership. The ETF catalyst is real; it doesn’t erase the exchange-access and downside headlines.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I’m Priya Anand: The data pack offers one meaningful adoption catalyst—ETF products with staking rewards—but no token-supply, valuation, revenue, or unlock metrics. That leaves the fundamental case catalyst-led rather than fully evidenced.
759694eb8d3c8c4cb232b58f2e8da9403b2d102e68b3f684b2c910deeb5833b200f6f5bb5b065969cc8e7a7da551e81002c3c601fccb1b62d647adc3d619d114Committed 2026-08-25T00:20:00+00:00 · 87 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23