SUI / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SUI’s 43.7 RSI offers no rescue from a 22.7% gap below its 200-day average
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-15 00:43 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A+
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
Bullish
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -13.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — -11.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Neutral — -2.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -7.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +4.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -8.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Neutral — -3.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — +0.4% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a decisive close above 0.819, the 60-day high.. Cautious read: a break below $0.6503 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: I’m Mara Frost, and Leo’s “spring-loaded” story rests on a positive MACD sliver that is explicitly contracting.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I’m Mara Frost, and Leo’s “spring-loaded” story rests on a positive MACD sliver that is explicitly contracting. Key support to defend sits near $0.6503. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’m Leo Vance, and I’ll concede the bear’s cleanest number: SUI is 22.7% below SMA200, with the 60-day low only 5.0% beneath at 0.6503. But RSI at 43.7 isn’t capitulation, MACD histogram is still positive at +0.001831, and fear at 34 can mean the bad news is already stale; this looks like a spring-loaded rebound zone, not a guaranteed collapse. I also acknowledge my side’s recent record: the 2026-08-07 underweight call lost with SUI at +3.8% versus BTC, so the tape has already punished premature pessimism.
I’m Mara Frost, and Leo’s “spring-loaded” story rests on a positive MACD sliver that is explicitly contracting. The decisive structure is still a 19.2% bearish SMA50-versus-SMA200 spread, a 7.6% 30-day decline, and taker buy/sell at 0.86; RSI 43.7 is nowhere near the exhaustion Leo needs. The 2026-08-07 underweight loss at +3.8% versus BTC proves a bearish call can miss, not that today’s broken trend has healed.
I’m more bearish than the ruling: SUI is 16.7% below 0.819, down 7.6% over 30 days, and 69.3% of accounts are long, leaving more downside room if the 0.6503 floor fails. The 2.26 long/short ratio suggests crowded optimism is still underpriced as a reversal risk.
I’m focused on the fragile exhibit: the 60-day low at 0.6503 is only 5.0% below price, so a modest floor defense could invalidate the near-term bearish extension. The positive MACD histogram at +0.001831 and RSI 43.7 also leave room for a sharp countertrend move.
I’m arbitrating that the aggressive desk overreaches on immediate downside, while the conservative desk overreaches on treating a positive MACD reading as repair. The deciding condition is whether SUI holds 0.6503; a break makes the bearish ruling stronger, while a decisive recovery toward 0.819 defeats it.
· 0.6503 support defense
· contracting positive MACD histogram
· crypto-wide headline rebound
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a decisive close above 0.819, the 60-day high.
Mara, the 60-day low is 0.6503 and price is still 5.0% above it; that’s a defined floor, not open air. A contracting MACD histogram can turn before the moving averages do.
Leo, a floor is only a floor after buyers defend it. With taker buy/sell at 0.86 and 69.3% of accounts long, the crowd is leaning into that supposed floor while sellers control execution.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day low is 0.6503 and price is still 5.0% above it; that’s a defined floor, not open air. A contracting MACD histogram can turn before the moving averages do.
Leo, a floor is only a floor after buyers defend it. With taker buy/sell at 0.86 and 69.3% of accounts long, the crowd is leaning into that supposed floor while sellers control execution.
I’m Theo Okafor: the 2.26 long/short ratio is the awkward exhibit here. Funding is unavailable, so I won’t invent a squeeze metric, but account skew plus 0.86 taker flow says bullish exposure is not being confirmed by aggressive demand.
I’m Dmitri Volkov: the broader crypto headlines may lift the tide, but SUI is down 7.6% over 30 days and remains 16.7% below its 60-day high of 0.819. Liquidity optimism has not translated into relative strength.
I’m Judge Aldrich, and the bearish side wins. The decisive exhibit is the 19.2% bearish SMA50-versus-SMA200 spread, reinforced by SUI trading 22.7% below SMA200 and facing weak taker flow at 0.86. This ruling differs from the recent underweight losses on 2026-08-07 (+3.8% versus BTC) and 2026-08-01 (-4.7% versus BTC) because today’s data combines entrenched long-term trend damage with still-crowded long accounts and a contracting rebound signal. I overturn it if SUI closes above 0.819, the 60-day high, or if the data shows a sustained reversal that restores price above its major moving averages.
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Same yardstick for everyone — Wilson 95% CI, settled facts only. KOL outcomes are transcribed from VeraMind's ledger, not re-graded. · Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I’m Kai Nakamura, and the chart is structurally bearish: SUI sits 22.7% below SMA200, 4.4% below SMA50, and the SMA50 trails SMA200 by 19.2%. RSI at 43.7 is not oversold, while MACD histogram at +0.001831 is contracting; direction bearish, evidence families moving averages, RSI, MACD, multi-horizon returns, conflicts short-term MACD remains positive, sufficiency adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m Sofia Reyes: fear is real at 34, but the crowd is still leaning long, with 69.3% long accounts and a 2.26 long/short ratio. Taker buy/sell at 0.86 confirms sellers have the immediate edge; direction bearish, evidence families Fear & Greed, account skew, taker flow, social posts, conflicts only 3 bullish and 0 bearish StockTwits messages, sufficiency adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m Ed Walsh. The tape carries contradictory headlines: one report says SUI surged 25%, while MarketWatch reports large cryptocurrencies including Sui declining; the quantum-safe wallet work is a constructive development, but it has not repaired the chart. Macro crypto headlines are supportive, yet SUI-specific news flow is noisy rather than decisively bullish.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I’m Priya Anand. The quantum-safe hardware-wallet initiative is a credible product-development signal, but the data pack provides no token-supply, revenue, adoption, or valuation figures to offset the technical deterioration. A network outage headline paired with reported price stability is not enough to establish a fundamental rerating.
ecfe180dc1c57b71836015f0c240fb2662c48df2286671831b6cb0c4f11d65cdb9992f9aaddcb66d097da88829da3966f8938204256939eecd449461ccbccfffCommitted 2026-08-16T00:20:00+00:00 · 96 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23