SUI / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SUI’s 22.9% seven-day surge meets 74 Greed and a bearish moving-average structure
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-25 00:42 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
Bullish
B
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -13.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — -11.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Neutral — -2.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -7.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +4.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -8.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Neutral — -3.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — +0.4% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A close above $0.9555 overturns the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.634 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: I’m Mara Frost.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I’m Mara Frost. Key support to defend sits near $0.634. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’m Leo Vance, and I’ll concede Mara’s strongest number: SUI sits 7.3% below the SMA200 with the SMA50 16.6% under it, a genuinely ugly long-term chart. But that wreckage is stale overhead while price has ripped 22.9% in seven days, sits 11.4% over the SMA20, and RSI at 61.1 still isn’t exhaustion; the tape is already rebuilding above $0.80.
I’m Mara Frost. Leo is dressing a rebound in a tuxedo: the 22.9% seven-day move has produced a 4.178% daily loss, and the broader moving-average structure still says the trend is damaged. His $0.80 base is fragile when 71.0% of accounts are long, takers lean sell at 0.91, and price remains 16.2% below $0.9555.
I’m the aggressive desk. The bearish call leaves room for a momentum extension because SUI is 11.4% above SMA20, 22.9% higher over seven days, and only 16.2% below $0.9555; a break of that high would expose how underpriced the ETF-and-staking catalyst is.
I’m the conservative desk. The fastest failure is a squeeze against the crowded bearish read: 71.0% long accounts and an L/S ratio of 2.45 can fuel another vertical move, while RSI at 61.1 is not yet extreme. The fragile exhibit is the 0.91 taker buy/sell ratio, which can reverse quickly.
I’m the neutral desk. The aggressive thesis overreaches on recent momentum, while the conservative thesis overreaches if it ignores the bearish 16.6% SMA50/SMA200 structure; the deciding condition is whether $0.8004 holds or gives way toward $0.634. The August 14 underweight win of 7.5% versus BTC supports today’s call more than the August 8 and 7 losses of 4.7% and 3.8% undermine it.
· crowded long accounts at 71.0%
· ETF staking-reward adoption
· Bitcoin-driven beta rebound
Invalidation: A close above $0.9555 overturns the bearish ruling.
Mara, you’re treating the SMA200 like a courtroom verdict, but price is already 11.2% above the SMA50 and RSI is only 61.1. A contracting MACD histogram at +0.01619 is a cooling engine, not a dead one.
Leo, that cooling engine is precisely the problem: momentum is fading while the crowd is 71.0% long. If $0.8004 cannot hold after a 22.9% sprint, the distance to the $0.634 low becomes the honest map.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(5)
Mara, you’re treating the SMA200 like a courtroom verdict, but price is already 11.2% above the SMA50 and RSI is only 61.1. A contracting MACD histogram at +0.01619 is a cooling engine, not a dead one.
Leo, that cooling engine is precisely the problem: momentum is fading while the crowd is 71.0% long. If $0.8004 cannot hold after a 22.9% sprint, the distance to the $0.634 low becomes the honest map.
I’m Theo Okafor. The 2.45 L/S ratio is not subtle, and the 0.91 taker buy/sell ratio refuses to confirm the bullish social count of 13 versus 2. Funding is absent, so nobody gets to invent a squeeze narrative.
Theo, fair—but crowded optimism can stay solvent when the chart is above both SMA20 and SMA50. A clean recovery toward $0.9555 would force the skeptics to explain why their bearish structure kept failing.
I’m Dmitri Volkov. Bitcoin nearing $80,000 may lift beta temporarily, but the headline itself flags the next pullback as decisive. SUI’s 16.6% bearish SMA50-versus-SMA200 spread leaves it exposed when liquidity turns.
I’m Judge Aldrich. The bearish side wins on the decisive exhibit: 71.0% long accounts against a 0.91 taker buy/sell ratio, layered onto a bearish SMA50/SMA200 spread of 16.6%. The recent August 14 underweight call won by 7.5% versus BTC, while August 8 and 7 underweight calls lost by 4.7% and 3.8%; this call differs because today’s crowding and sell-taking are now directly visible. I overturn the ruling if SUI closes above $0.9555.
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Same yardstick for everyone — Wilson 95% CI, settled facts only. KOL outcomes are transcribed from VeraMind's ledger, not re-graded. · Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I’m Kai Nakamura. SUI trades at $0.8004, 11.4% above its SMA20 and 11.2% above its SMA50, but remains 7.3% below its SMA200. RSI is 61.1 and MACD histogram is positive at 0.01619 yet contracting; the $0.9555 60-day high is the key upside test.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m Sofia Reyes. Crowd enthusiasm is stretched: Fear&Greed is 74, long accounts are 71.0% with an L/S ratio of 2.45, and StockTwits shows 13 bullish versus 2 bearish messages. The taker buy/sell ratio at 0.91 cuts against the cheerleading, while funding is unavailable.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m Ed Walsh. Phantom’s scheduled Sui-support exit on September 24 is a concrete ecosystem-distribution headline, despite SUI ETF launches on Nasdaq and NYSE Arca offering staking rewards. The news flow is therefore a tug-of-war between a wallet-access shock and a newer institutional-access narrative.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I’m Priya Anand. The ETF launches with staking rewards provide a constructive access and yield catalyst, but the data pack offers no token-supply, revenue, usage, or valuation figures. Phantom’s planned support withdrawal is the clearest coin-specific fundamental risk in the available evidence.
e5f3c90e0f81954eb2ca110c5f71f2fb275476ed05e492c1780769db7fe4ed2014faabecdb7719003b4bda7de235e76e71170edaad505076d223f4a3b6d33cbeCommitted 2026-08-26T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23