SUI / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SUI at $0.6781 sits 22.9% below its 200-day average as bearish structure persists
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-16 00:45 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
Bullish
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -13.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — -11.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Neutral — -2.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -7.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +4.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -8.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Neutral — -3.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — +0.4% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim of $0.7826 would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.6503 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo is dressing proximity to support as proof of support.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo is dressing proximity to support as proof of support. Key support to defend sits near $0.6503. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I concede the ugly number, Mara: SUI is 22.9% under SMA200 and 13.4% below the 60-day high. But RSI at 42.4 isn’t capitulation, MACD histogram is still positive at +0.001332, and price is only 4.3% above $0.6503 support; that makes the stale bearish structure vulnerable to a rebound. The recent August 7 and August 8 underweight calls lost as SUI outperformed BTC by 3.8% and 4.7%, so fading relative strength has already been a costly habit.
Leo is dressing proximity to support as proof of support. The core exhibit is not RSI; it’s price 5.0% below SMA50, 22.9% below SMA200, with SMA50 itself 18.8% beneath SMA200. A contracting positive MACD histogram is momentum decaying, not a rescue flare, and the 70.5% long-account share leaves plenty of eager dip-buyers to become supply.
· Support bounce from $0.6503
· Recent relative-strength losses in August 7-8 calls
· Funding data unavailable
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim of $0.7826 would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, your moving averages are rear-view mirrors. SUI is at $0.6781 against a $0.6503 low, and RSI 42.4 leaves room for mean reversion before true exhaustion.
Leo, mean reversion needs demand. Taker flow is 0.97, 30-day performance is -8.3%, and your $0.6503 cushion is only 4.3% away from breaking.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(6)
Mara, your moving averages are rear-view mirrors. SUI is at $0.6781 against a $0.6503 low, and RSI 42.4 leaves room for mean reversion before true exhaustion.
Leo, mean reversion needs demand. Taker flow is 0.97, 30-day performance is -8.3%, and your $0.6503 cushion is only 4.3% away from breaking.
Leo has one useful point: the crowd is fearful at 34, yet long accounts are 70.5%. That is not clean capitulation; it is bullish exposure sitting inside a fearful tape, while funding is unavailable and cannot validate either side.
Theo’s distinction matters, but the macro tape offers no liquidity rescue in this pack. Bitcoin strength from ETF inflows coexists with a MarketWatch report of Sui declines; $0.7826 is still 13.4% overhead.
And the record matters, Mara: underweight was a loss on August 7 at +3.8% versus BTC and again on August 8 at +4.7%. Repeating that call while the token holds above $0.6503 is complacency wearing a chartist’s coat.
Those losses do not erase today’s structure. The current pack differs only because the prior call was wrong; it does not show a bullish breakout, and six bullish tags versus zero bearish tags hardly proves hidden demand.
I rule for the bearish side: SUI’s 5.0% discount to SMA50 and 22.9% discount to SMA200, reinforced by SMA50 sitting 18.8% below SMA200, is the decisive exhibit. The recent August 7 and August 8 underweight losses came against BTC, but the current call is supported by a broader bearish moving-average structure and crowded long accounts at 70.5%. My ruling is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of $0.7826, the 60-day high.
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Same yardstick for everyone — Wilson 95% CI, settled facts only. KOL outcomes are transcribed from VeraMind's ledger, not re-graded. · Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Bearish: SUI trades 1.0% below SMA20, 5.0% below SMA50, and 22.9% below SMA200; SMA50 is 18.8% below SMA200. RSI is 42.4 and the MACD histogram is positive but contracting, so the evidence is adequate, with short-term momentum slightly less weak than the broader trend.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Bearish: Fear & Greed is 34, taker buy/sell is 0.97, and 70.5% of long accounts are long with an L/S ratio of 2.39. Six bullish StockTwits tags versus zero bearish tags add a fragile optimism conflict; evidence is adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The headline tape is conflicted: Bitcoin ETF inflows and a reported SUI surge appear in one item, while MarketWatch reports declines in large cryptocurrencies including Sui. The quantum-safe hardware-wallet work is a constructive product signal, but it has no demonstrated near-term price impact.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The co-founder’s quantum-safe hardware-wallet card project could strengthen Sui’s ecosystem narrative, but the data pack provides no adoption, revenue, unlock, or valuation figures. Fundamental conviction is therefore limited for a near-term verdict.
590bd9edfa947fae07789952aba58bb2b135e49ba62cb894b95917e58eeb6b8deaff5f24ed3adac83e409d856a55f50f8d212bab4f7befa37a3192bd7340acc9Committed 2026-08-17T00:20:00+00:00 · 89 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23