SUI / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SUI’s 0.7417 price sits 13.7% below its SMA200 as crowded optimism meets a weakening tape
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-29 00:52 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A+
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
Bullish
B
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -13.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — -11.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Neutral — -2.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -7.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +4.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -8.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Neutral — -3.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — +0.4% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above the 0.9555 60-day high.. Cautious read: a break below $0.634 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that “defined floor” is 16.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that “defined floor” is 16. Key support to defend sits near $0.634. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: SUI is 13.7% below its SMA200, and the 5.081% daily drop looks like a brick through the windshield. But RSI is 50.6, price still sits 1.3% above SMA20 and 2.7% above SMA50, and the 30-day gain is 7.1%—that says correction inside a battered structure, not a fresh collapse. The TSUI ETF debut is a real catalyst, while the 60-day low at 0.634 leaves a defined floor.
Leo, that “defined floor” is 16.9% below spot, hardly proof of support; it’s simply the next place hope may go to die. The decisive exhibit is the bearish moving-average structure: SMA50 is 16.0% below SMA200, while the MACD histogram is contracting. A neutral RSI does not rescue a trend that is already down 9.0% over seven days.
I think the bearish ruling leaves upside underpriced: SUI is already 22.4% below the 0.9555 60-day high, while the TSUI ETF debut and a 7.1% 30-day gain show that recovery fuel exists. The 0.634 low is 16.9% below spot, so the reward space toward prior highs is larger than the ruling admits.
The fastest failure point is the crowding exhibit: 69.6% long accounts and a 2.29 L/S ratio sit beside a 0.89 taker buy/sell ratio. If the 0.741 level gives way, that optimism can unwind into a direct test of 0.634; the latest record’s two WIN underweight calls also shows this bearish framework has recently resolved cleanly.
Leo overreached by treating the 7.1% monthly gain as trend evidence; Mara overreached only if she treats 0.634 as inevitable. The deciding condition is whether SUI reclaims 0.9555 or instead breaks below the current 0.741 area toward the 0.634 low.
· TSUI ETF access catalyst
· RSI 50.6 leaves room for rebound
· 30-day gain of 7.1%
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above the 0.9555 60-day high.
Mara, you’re treating the SMA200 like a courtroom verdict, but price is still above SMA20 and SMA50. A 7.1% monthly gain means the tape has shown it can recover.
Leo, recovery without long-term trend repair is just a bounce wearing a tie. The 0.9555 high is still 22.4% away, and momentum has already slipped 9.0% in seven days.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating the SMA200 like a courtroom verdict, but price is still above SMA20 and SMA50. A 7.1% monthly gain means the tape has shown it can recover.
Leo, recovery without long-term trend repair is just a bounce wearing a tie. The 0.9555 high is still 22.4% away, and momentum has already slipped 9.0% in seven days.
I’m siding against the crowd, and the arithmetic is ugly: 69.6% of long accounts, L/S at 2.29, yet taker buy/sell is 0.89. That is optimism with weaker immediate demand behind it.
The ETF headline is a liquidity story only if flows follow; the pack shows no flow confirmation. Meanwhile, the price is 13.7% below SMA200, which is the macro tape’s way of saying enthusiasm arrived early.
I rule for the bear case: SUI is underweight. The decisive exhibit is the 16.0% bearish SMA50-versus-SMA200 spread, reinforced by 69.6% long accounts and a 0.89 taker buy/sell ratio. This ruling is overturned by a sustained recovery above the 0.9555 60-day high or a clear reversal of the bearish moving-average structure.
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Same yardstick for everyone — Wilson 95% CI, settled facts only. KOL outcomes are transcribed from VeraMind's ledger, not re-graded. · Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
The chart is trapped beneath the long-term trend: price is 13.7% under SMA200, while SMA50 trails SMA200 by 16.0%. RSI at 50.6 is neutral, and the contracting positive MACD histogram of +0.0007583 offers little thrust.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
The crowd is leaning hard into optimism: Fear & Greed is 68, long accounts are 69.6%, and the L/S ratio is 2.29. Yet taker buy/sell is only 0.89, so the bullish chorus is louder than the aggressive flow.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The headline mix cuts both ways, but the damaging items are specific: Phantom is reportedly dropping Sui as a second-chain exit, while FXEmpire flags ecosystem-growth concerns and a 12% downside risk. The SUI ETF debut on Nasdaq via TSUI is a constructive counterweight, but it has not prevented a 5.081% 24-hour decline.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The ETF listing broadens access, but the data pack gives no hard adoption, revenue, supply, or valuation figures to offset the ecosystem-growth concern. The market is therefore being asked to price an access catalyst against a weakening growth narrative.
4941ee4328c78ae407f88bc831f9805f62efb346f1a55d1416f5939c7ea839b2adde2046047c35b2be3d774c5e58080e229d71d404353d96fdaed9f2e1bcf4e2Committed 2026-08-30T00:20:00+00:00 · 91 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23