SUI / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SUI rebounds 3.747% to $0.7365, but the bearish long-term structure still dominates
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-21 00:43 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
Bullish
B
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -13.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — -11.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Neutral — -2.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -7.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +4.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -8.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Neutral — -3.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — +0.4% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained close above $0.7826 with RSI above 61.0 overturns the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.634 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your 7.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your 7. Key support to defend sits near $0.634. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: SUI is still 15.1% below its SMA200, and the SMA50 trails that average by 17.7%. But the tape has already clawed 7.9% higher in seven days, RSI is a healthy 61.0, and MACD momentum is expanding; that bearish structure may be stale overhead rather than a fresh verdict. The August 7 and August 8 underweight calls lost as SUI outperformed BTC by 3.8% and 4.7%, so the market has already punished the reflexive bear case.
Leo, your 7.9% sprint runs straight into a 60-day high at $0.7826, only 5.9% away, while greed is 72 and 72.7% of accounts are long. That RSI 61.0 is not exhaustion, but it also does not neutralize a 2.66 long/short ratio, a 0.99 taker buy/sell ratio, or the Binance delisting headline. The August 7 and August 8 losses prove timing hurt the underweight calls; they do not repair the broken SMA200 structure.
I think the bearish ruling leaves too much upside unpriced: SUI is already 7.9% higher over seven days, MACD histogram is +0.007642 and expanding, and only 5.9% separates $0.7365 from the 60-day high of $0.7826. A clean break there could expose how quickly the two recent underweight losses repeat.
The fastest failure is a crowded unwind: Fear&Greed is 72, 72.7% of accounts are long, and the L/S ratio is 2.66 while taker buy/sell is only 0.99. The fragile exhibit is the short-term momentum, because the price remains 15.1% below SMA200 and Binance delisting news adds a direct liquidity shock.
Leo overreached on the expanding MACD; Mara overreached if she treats the recent underweight losses as irrelevant. The deciding condition is whether SUI breaks and holds above $0.7826; failure there keeps the 15.1% SMA200 gap in control.
· short-term momentum breakout
· crowded long accounts at 72.7%
· Binance delisting and liquidity risk
Invalidation: A sustained close above $0.7826 with RSI above 61.0 overturns the bearish ruling.
Mara, the $0.7826 ceiling is close, but price is above the SMA20 by 7.0% and above the SMA50 by 3.3%; that’s actual reclamation, not hopium.
Leo, reclamation without a break of $0.7826 is just a rally pressing against supply. Your strongest exhibit still sits 15.1% below the SMA200.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the $0.7826 ceiling is close, but price is above the SMA20 by 7.0% and above the SMA50 by 3.3%; that’s actual reclamation, not hopium.
Leo, reclamation without a break of $0.7826 is just a rally pressing against supply. Your strongest exhibit still sits 15.1% below the SMA200.
I’m with Mara on the crowd: 72.7% long and a 2.66 L/S ratio leave little emotional fuel if the 0.99 taker ratio stays below one. Funding is absent, so nobody gets to invent a confirmation premium.
The macro tape offers no clean liquidity tailwind here. Crypto regulation headlines may help the sector, but SUI’s own bearish moving-average stack and the Binance delisting risk are more immediate than a strategist’s distant Bitcoin target.
I rule bearish, with the decisive exhibit being SUI’s 15.1% discount to the SMA200 alongside a 17.7% SMA50-to-SMA200 bearish spread. The recent 3.747% daily rise and the two losing underweight calls on August 7 (+3.8% versus BTC) and August 8 (+4.7%) make this a lower-confidence bearish call, but the ruling flips if SUI closes above the 60-day high of $0.7826 while RSI remains above 61.0.
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Same yardstick for everyone — Wilson 95% CI, settled facts only. KOL outcomes are transcribed from VeraMind's ledger, not re-graded. · Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: Direction: mixed. Evidence families: RSI(14) 61.0, MACD histogram +0.007642 and expanding, price +7.0% vs SMA20, but price remains 15.1% below SMA200 and SMA50 sits 17.7% below SMA200. Conflicts: short-term momentum versus bearish long-term moving-average structure. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear&Greed 72, long accounts 72.7% with an L/S ratio of 2.66, taker buy/sell at 0.99, and StockTwits at 10 bullish versus 1 bearish. Conflicts: price has gained 7.9% over seven days despite balanced taker flow. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: Headlines are split: SUI is cited in a Binance spot-pair delisting story, while other reports highlight reclaimed $0.75 pricing, tokenized credit, and 6M+ TPS atomic-transaction claims. The news flow supports attention and narrative momentum, but the delisting headline is a direct liquidity and access risk.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: The 6M+ TPS atomic-transaction claim and tokenized-credit expansion provide a credible usage narrative. However, the data pack supplies no valuation, revenue, unlock, supply, or adoption figures, so fundamentals cannot override the chart and crowd evidence.
8fa638822601349e8299c06aa58629e6886adecf7b38b23dee9db0f14b19c6c75c21c070ba128f2a35607134962360a82f87d1bc3398b693184c1393829130b0Committed 2026-08-22T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23