SUI / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SUI’s 23.1% seven-day surge meets a 72.3% long-account crowd
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-23 00:41 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -13.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — -11.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Neutral — -2.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -7.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +4.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -8.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Neutral — -3.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — +0.4% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A daily close below 0.8080 overturns the bullish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.808 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo’s +23.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bullish, horizon Days (momentum).
Bold case: I’ll concede the ugliest number: SMA50 sits 17. Resistance to clear sits near $0.9555. Horizon: Days (momentum).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: SMA50 sits 17.0% below SMA200. But that is stale wreckage, not today’s engine—the price is 16.9% above SMA20, MACD is expanding at +0.01935, and the ETF debut gives this move a fresh spark. My earlier underweight call on August 8 lost as SUI gained 4.7% versus BTC, and August 7 lost with a 3.8% gain; this tape is now showing momentum the old stance failed to respect.
Leo’s +23.1% seven-day number is exactly the bait: RSI 69.1, Fear&Greed 66, and 72.3% long accounts show a crowded chase, not a clean breakout. Price is still 4.5% below SMA200, the 0.9555 60-day high is 13.6% away, and takers are net defensive at 0.87. Calling the bearish moving-average structure stale while the market remains beneath SMA200 is hopium with arithmetic.
I’m more bullish than the ruling: a 23.1% seven-day gain still leaves SUI 13.6% below the 0.9555 60-day high, so the chart has room if the ETF-with-staking narrative attracts follow-through. The +0.01935 expanding MACD histogram is the underpriced exhibit.
I see the fastest failure in the crowd: 72.3% long accounts, a 2.61 ratio, and Fear&Greed at 66 can unwind before the headline reaches price. The fragile exhibit is momentum itself—RSI 69.1 while price remains 4.5% below SMA200.
I think Mara overreaches by treating the bearish moving-average structure as decisive when the August 7 and August 8 underweight calls lost on +3.8% and +4.7% versus BTC. The deciding condition is whether SUI holds the latest candle’s 0.8080 low; above it, momentum wins, below it, the crowd thesis fractures.
· crowded longs at 72.3%
· price 4.5% below SMA200
· Binance delisting headline
Invalidation: A daily close below 0.8080 overturns the bullish ruling.
Mara, the market doesn’t need to reclaim SMA200 to keep running; +16.2% over 30 days and an expanding MACD already show the turn has traction.
Leo, traction without confirmation is a skid: the 0.8255 price is still 13.6% below 0.9555, while RSI 69.1 leaves little room for forgiving a failed push.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the market doesn’t need to reclaim SMA200 to keep running; +16.2% over 30 days and an expanding MACD already show the turn has traction.
Leo, traction without confirmation is a skid: the 0.8255 price is still 13.6% below 0.9555, while RSI 69.1 leaves little room for forgiving a failed push.
I’ll interrupt both of you: 72.3% long accounts and a 2.61 ratio make upside vulnerable to crowd unwinding, but funding is absent, so nobody can honestly claim perpetuals are definitively overheated.
And the macro backdrop is not a gift—BitMart’s shutdown fallout and the Sandbox bridge exploit reinforce liquidity stress, while SUI’s own ETF headline is the lone clean counterweight.
I rule for the bullish side, but only narrowly. The decisive exhibit is the expanding +0.01935 MACD histogram alongside a 23.1% seven-day advance, which outweighs the stale SMA50/SMA200 damage for a momentum horizon. This ruling is different from the August 8 and August 7 losing underweight calls because the present pack shows synchronized short-term momentum and a fresh ETF catalyst; it is invalidated by a daily move below the 0.8080 latest-candle low.
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Same yardstick for everyone — Wilson 95% CI, settled facts only. KOL outcomes are transcribed from VeraMind's ledger, not re-graded. · Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: I see acceleration: RSI is 69.1, MACD histogram is +0.01935 and expanding, while price sits 16.9% above SMA20. But the chart still carries a structural bruise: SMA50 is 17.0% below SMA200, and price remains 4.5% under SMA200.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: I see greed at 66, with long accounts at 72.3% and a 2.61 long/short ratio—crowd optimism is plainly extended. Taker buy/sell at 0.87 is the awkward counterweight: enthusiasm is loud, but immediate aggression is not confirming it.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The SUI ETF debut with staking rewards is the cleanest constructive headline in the pack. Binance’s planned delisting of seven spot pairs, including SUI, supplies a sharper negative headline, while the wider crypto news flow adds exchange and bridge-exploit stress without a direct SUI catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: The ETF debut with staking rewards could broaden SUI access and improve the asset’s yield narrative. The pack provides no token-supply, valuation, revenue, or network-usage figures, so fundamental conviction is limited.
eae840b2a5d65d31f47ca854a9f1f6ee2ca7aec7cdef52e370cf6a8ad442a2688dcc587613f29d0d57db9e6584607b513023911e8f47308581cffaaf7659dcc3Committed 2026-08-24T00:20:00+00:00 · 98 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24