SUI / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SUI’s 14.06% surge meets 74 RSI and a crowded 74.2% long-account skew
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-22 00:45 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -13.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — -11.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Neutral — -2.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -7.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +4.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -8.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Neutral — -3.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — +0.4% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned by a sustained break above $0.863 with RSI(14) below 70.. Cautious read: a break below $0.634 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your “engine” is running into the $0.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your “engine” is running into the $0. Key support to defend sits near $0.634. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: 74 RSI with 74.2% of long accounts leaning the same way. But the tape has already cleared 7-day gains of 24.1% and MACD is expanding at +0.01923; that’s a live breakout engine, not stale hope. My prior underweight calls on August 8 and 7 lost as SUI beat BTC by 4.7% and 3.8%, so fading strength has recently been expensive.
Leo, your “engine” is running into the $0.863 60-day high just 2.6% above price, with the crowd packed long at an L/S ratio of 2.87. The same 24.1% seven-day sprint is precisely why RSI 74 is actionable, not decorative: upside is near resistance while the structural SMA50-to-SMA200 spread is still -17.3%.
The bullish case has more room than the ruling admits: SUI is only 2.6% below the $0.863 60-day high, and MACD histogram expansion at +0.01923 could drive a clean breakout. The August 7 and 8 underweight calls lost by 3.8% and 4.7% versus BTC, showing that momentum can stay irrational longer than this verdict expects.
The fastest failure is a crowded unwind: 74.2% of long accounts and an L/S ratio of 2.87 meet RSI 74.0 after a 24.1% seven-day rise. The fragile exhibit is the breakout premise, because taker buy/sell is 0.95 and the structural SMA50-versus-SMA200 reading remains -17.3%.
Leo overreached on momentum persistence; Mara overreached only if she treats the bearish moving averages as an immediate timing signal. The deciding condition is whether SUI breaks and holds above $0.863 or instead rejects that level while RSI remains above 70.
· momentum breakout above $0.863
· ETF staking-reward demand
· broader crypto rally
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned by a sustained break above $0.863 with RSI(14) below 70.
Mara, the 60-day high at $0.863 is a launchpad if momentum clears it; MACD is expanding, and SUI is up 12.9% over 30 days despite the old bearish moving-average gap.
Leo, “if it clears” is doing all the work. Price is already 19.8% above SMA20, and the failed breakout risk is immediate when taker buy/sell is only 0.95.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day high at $0.863 is a launchpad if momentum clears it; MACD is expanding, and SUI is up 12.9% over 30 days despite the old bearish moving-average gap.
Leo, “if it clears” is doing all the work. Price is already 19.8% above SMA20, and the failed breakout risk is immediate when taker buy/sell is only 0.95.
I’m with Mara on crowd geometry: 74.2% long accounts and an L/S ratio of 2.87 leave little evidence of fresh, balanced demand. Funding is not provided, so nobody gets to invent a carry signal.
The macro tape may lift SUI with the broader crypto bounce, but that is beta, not protection. A move back toward the $0.634 60-day low would erase 32.5% from here, while the long-term average structure still points down.
I rule for the bear side: SUI is underweight. The decisive exhibit is the combination of RSI 74.0 with 74.2% long accounts and price only 2.6% below the $0.863 60-day high, while SMA50 remains 17.3% below SMA200. This differs from the August 7 and 8 losing underweight calls because today’s pack shows a sharper 24.1% seven-day run, explicit crowding, and near-term resistance; the ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above $0.863 with RSI holding below 70.
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Verify this settlement
Same yardstick for everyone — Wilson 95% CI, settled facts only. KOL outcomes are transcribed from VeraMind's ledger, not re-graded. · Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: Direction bearish near term. RSI(14) is 74.0, price sits 19.8% above SMA20 and 17.2% above SMA50, while the 60-day high at $0.863 is only 2.6% away. MACD histogram is expanding at +0.01923, but SMA50 remains 17.3% below SMA200, preserving the larger bearish structure.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Direction bearish contrarian. Fear & Greed is 71, long accounts are 74.2% with an L/S ratio of 2.87, and StockTwits shows 8 bullish versus 0 bearish messages. Taker buy/sell at 0.95 conflicts with the bullish crowding; evidence sufficiency is adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: News direction bullish but fragile. SUI ETFs debuted on Nasdaq and NYSE Arca with staking rewards, while MarketWatch reported SUI rising alongside major cryptocurrencies. The counterweight is a reported Binance delisting involving SUI pairs and a forecast calling for $0.607606 by August 26, 2026.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: Fundamentals direction bullish on access and yield narrative, based on ETF listings with staking rewards. The data pack provides no token-supply, revenue, valuation, or network-usage metrics, so fundamental support is narrow.
5a0a31f2745d28863a2538d3de21913f521b5bf8cde69f6b46d50eeb6e2764084dce84591bab17edc3dcb06a2ee866c2e70ff75132d5ba0582c8c8ce8beda186Committed 2026-08-23T00:20:00+00:00 · 94 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23