JUP / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
JUP holds a bullish structure 17.2% above its SMA200 despite a 1.5% daily dip
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-30 01:37 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bullish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — +3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +16.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — +6.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -3.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Neutral — -8.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Neutral — -5.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -6.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -8.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -8.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Neutral — -8.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Neutral — -8.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Neutral — -5.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +5.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +4.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +6.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — +4.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — +6.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — +0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Neutral — -8.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -7.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A close below 0.2163, confirmed by RSI(14) falling below 50, invalidates the bullish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.2163 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your staircase is built on a contracting MACD histogram of only +0.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bullish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I concede the cleanest bearish number: taker buy/sell is 0. Resistance to clear sits near $0.2534. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I concede the cleanest bearish number: taker buy/sell is 0.91 while Fear&Greed sits at 69, so the crowd is not exactly hiding its optimism. But the chart has already absorbed that froth and still sits 11.5% above SMA20, 12.3% above SMA50, and 17.2% above SMA200; that is a rising staircase, not a hopium candle. The recent August 21 underweight call lost as JUP delivered +16.0% versus BTC, and today’s MA structure is materially stronger than a fading tape.
Leo, your staircase is built on a contracting MACD histogram of only +0.003634 and a miserable +0.1% over seven days. The 30-day +12.4% gain is precisely why the 14.4% gap to the 60-day high at 0.2534 is vulnerable to profit-taking, especially with 54.1% of accounts long and takers net selling. The August 21 underweight LOSS proves nothing about today’s catalyst; it only proves that hindsight can decorate a broken thesis.
I see more upside than the ruling admits: JUP is still 14.4% below the 60-day high of 0.2534, while the 30-day move is +12.4% and RSI is only 59.6, not an overbought reading. The August 21 underweight call resolved as a LOSS at +16.0% versus BTC, so the market has already shown it can punish bearish framing.
The fastest failure is a demand rollover: taker buy/sell is 0.91 against 54.1% long accounts and Fear&Greed at 69. That makes 0.2163 the fragile exhibit; a break would challenge the bullish interpretation before any 0.2534 retest.
The conservative desk overreaches if it treats absent funding data as proof of excessive crowding, while the aggressive desk overreaches if it treats the August 21 LOSS as predictive. The deciding condition is whether JUP holds 0.2163; holding it preserves the bullish structure, breaking it damages the call.
· taker buy/sell at 0.91
· Greed reading of 69 with 54.1% long accounts
· Sanctum leading Jupiter at $1.66B TVL
Invalidation: A close below 0.2163, confirmed by RSI(14) falling below 50, invalidates the bullish ruling.
Mara, the tape is not broken: JUP is 32.9% above the 60-day low at 0.1632, and SMA50 remains 4.3% above SMA200. Your profit-taking story needs an actual breakdown, not a sinister adjective.
Leo, the actual warning is the 0.91 taker ratio. Price can float above every average while aggressive demand quietly evaporates; 0.2163 is the latest candle low, and a breach would expose how thin your staircase is.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the tape is not broken: JUP is 32.9% above the 60-day low at 0.1632, and SMA50 remains 4.3% above SMA200. Your profit-taking story needs an actual breakdown, not a sinister adjective.
Leo, the actual warning is the 0.91 taker ratio. Price can float above every average while aggressive demand quietly evaporates; 0.2163 is the latest candle low, and a breach would expose how thin your staircase is.
I’m with Mara on the flow asymmetry: 54.1% long accounts and a 1.18 L/S ratio leave more optimism than buying pressure. Still, no funding rate is provided, so nobody gets to call this extreme crowding.
The macro tape offers no fresh liquidity exhibit in this pack, only a market headline about a $1.1 million crypto-card hack crashing another token 49%. That is contagion risk, not proof that JUP’s own 17.2% SMA200 premium must unwind.
I rule for the bullish side. The decisive exhibit is the aligned moving-average structure: price is 17.2% above SMA200 and SMA50 is 4.3% above SMA200, outweighing the softer taker flow and contracting MACD. This ruling is invalidated by a close below the latest candle low at 0.2163, especially if RSI(14) also falls below 50. The recent calls differ because the current pack contains explicit bullish MA alignment, RSI at 59.6, and a +12.4% 30-day trend; the August 21 underweight LOSS at +16.0% versus BTC did not have these current exhibits available.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bullish. Evidence families: moving-average structure, RSI, price momentum, key levels, MACD. Conflicts: MACD histogram is contracting at +0.003634 and 7-day performance is only +0.1%. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear&Greed 69, long accounts 54.1%, long/short ratio 1.18, taker buy/sell 0.91. Conflicts: crowding is moderate rather than extreme, and 30-day performance is +12.4%. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Jupiter has ceded Solana’s top-protocol TVL ranking to Sanctum at $1.66B, but recent coverage also reports JUP gains of 14% and 5% as traders return to Solana DeFi aggregators. The headline flow is constructive on ecosystem activity, though Jupiter’s relative TVL standing is a visible reputational drag.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The pack provides no direct token-economics, revenue, supply, or valuation metrics. Sanctum’s $1.66B TVL lead is a competitive warning, while renewed Solana DeFi activity supports Jupiter’s usage narrative; fundamental evidence is therefore limited.
0b65694960ec193539b92a59d666976c1659b2d8d09afd8244454a25546f13d10071e3de26d06e3c755183e93ee239d43345bcb211c72f3e329230375244b41bCommitted 2026-08-31T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23