JUP / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
JUP’s 30-day slide is still -21.2% despite a bullish SMA structure and +0.0005104 MACD histogram
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-01 00:54 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-09-05 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-09-01 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-31 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-30 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-29 — Neutral — -4.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Overweight — -11.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Overweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Overweight — +0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — +3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +16.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — +6.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -3.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Neutral — -8.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Neutral — -5.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -6.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -8.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -8.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Neutral — -8.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Neutral — -8.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Neutral — -5.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +5.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +4.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +6.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — +4.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — +6.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — +0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim of 0.1931 followed by a move back above SMA50 invalidates the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.1919 voids this research. Confidence Low — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Mara: Leo is polishing a cracked mirror.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Mara: Leo is polishing a cracked mirror. Key support to defend sits near $0.1919. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
Leo: I’ll concede the ugly number, Mara: JUP is down 21.2% over 30 days and sits 6.7% under SMA50. But the tape has already absorbed that damage; price is still 3.9% above SMA200, the SMA50 remains 11.3% above SMA200, and MACD is expanding positive at 0.0005104. The recent underweight calls on July 23 and July 24 lost as JUP beat BTC by 6.6% and 4.3%; that’s a warning that the short thesis keeps stepping on rakes.
Mara: Leo is polishing a cracked mirror. Being 3.9% above SMA200 does not rescue a coin that is below both SMA20 and SMA50, with RSI only 45.4 and a 60-day high still 24.3% away. The July 23 and July 24 underweight losses are facts, but they do not invalidate the current 30-day wreckage or prove this bounce has durable demand.
I’m more bullish than the ruling: JUP is only 1.44% lower over 24 hours, up 3.0% over 7 days, and still 3.9% above SMA200. Fear&Greed at 27 plus the July 23 and July 24 underweight losses suggests downside may be more crowded than the chart admits.
I’m focused on the fastest failure: the bullish MA structure is fragile because price remains 6.7% below SMA50 and 1.5% below SMA20. If 0.1919 gives way toward the 0.1441 60-day low, the positive MACD reading becomes the most fragile exhibit.
I think Leo overreached on MACD, while Mara overreached by treating the 21.2% decline as a complete forecast. The deciding condition is whether JUP can reclaim 0.1931 and then hold above SMA50; until that happens, the bearish edge survives.
· positive MACD expansion
· JUPUSD adoption narrative
· fear-driven rebound
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim of 0.1931 followed by a move back above SMA50 invalidates the bearish ruling.
Mara, you’re treating the 21.2% drawdown as fresh information when the market has already traveled through it. The 0.1441 60-day low and positive MACD say exhaustion is possible.
Leo, exhaustion needs buyers, and taker buy/sell is only 0.98. With 60.3% of long accounts already leaning long, your supposed reversal has a crowd waiting to be disappointed.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating the 21.2% drawdown as fresh information when the market has already traveled through it. The 0.1441 60-day low and positive MACD say exhaustion is possible.
Leo, exhaustion needs buyers, and taker buy/sell is only 0.98. With 60.3% of long accounts already leaning long, your supposed reversal has a crowd waiting to be disappointed.
Leo, the 1.52 long/short ratio supports Mara’s crowding point, but Fear&Greed at 27 says sentiment is fearful rather than euphoric. That combination can fuel a squeeze, yet funding is unavailable, so I won’t invent confirmation.
Theo, fear is not liquidity. Bitcoin’s August tape is described as choppy after forced-selling exhaustion, and JUP remains 24.3% below its 60-day high. Macro can turn this fragile rebound into another lower high.
I rule for the bearish side, but only narrowly: the decisive exhibit is JUP’s 6.7% discount to SMA50 alongside a 21.2% 30-day loss. This ruling is different from the July 23 and July 24 underweight losses because today’s pack shows price still below SMA20/SMA50 and taker flow at 0.98 despite those prior relative-strength reversals. I overturn it if JUP reclaims 0.1931 and sustains above SMA50, or if RSI rises above 50 while MACD remains expanding.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: I see a split chart. JUP sits 1.5% below SMA20 and 6.7% below SMA50, but remains 3.9% above SMA200; RSI is 45.4 and MACD histogram is expanding at +0.0005104.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Fear&Greed is 27, while long accounts still lead at 60.3% with a 1.52 long/short ratio. Taker flow is slightly soft at 0.98, so fear hasn't yet flushed the bullish crowd.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The headline tape is constructive but not decisive: JupUSD is reportedly backed by BlackRock’s tokenized Treasury fund, while broader crypto news says forced selling is exhausted but August may stay choppy. The 12.8% JUP surge headline is not enough to erase the current 24h loss of 1.44%.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: JupUSD’s reported Treasury backing could strengthen Jupiter’s product narrative and liquidity relevance. The data pack provides no token-supply, revenue, valuation, or adoption figures, so fundamentals cannot carry a months-long verdict.
bbbe3f79505c6695b812dd23c64a7138531b57b7421e01451f37f5451550a6ae17a05f840206e04eacebcefa609c9830d9d348d2983cb8ad8c7220012e6658ecCommitted 2026-08-02T00:20:00+00:00 · 94 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25