JUP / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
JUP holds above its moving averages, but a 0.2059 price and contracting MACD keep the verdict balanced
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-31 01:59 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bullish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Neutral
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A+
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — +3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +16.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — +6.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -3.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Neutral — -8.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Neutral — -5.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -6.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -8.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -8.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Neutral — -8.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Neutral — -8.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Neutral — -5.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +5.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +4.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +6.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — +4.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — +6.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — +0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Neutral — -8.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -7.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A daily close below 0.2038 with RSI below 50 invalidates the neutral-to-constructive read.. Cautious read: a break below $0.2038 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo’s 10.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Mixed, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo’s 10. Key support to defend sits near $0.2038. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number: JUP fell 5.113% in 24 hours and the MACD histogram is contracting at +0.001559. But that looks like a pullback inside a still-rising chassis—price is 10.9% above SMA200, SMA50 is 4.1% above SMA200, and the 0.1632 low sits 26.0% below spot. I also acknowledge my side’s recent 2026-08-21 underweight call lost as JUP returned +16.0% versus BTC; today’s bullish moving-average alignment is materially different from a naked bearish read.
Leo’s 10.9% SMA200 cushion is a rear-view mirror, not a catalyst. The decisive short-term evidence is the 5.113% daily slide, 7-day loss of 2.5%, contracting MACD, and a 0.90 taker ratio—buyers are not defending the tape with urgency. I’ll acknowledge the 2026-08-21 underweight loss at +16.0% versus BTC, but that does not erase today’s failed momentum; the 2026-08-23 overweight call won only +3.9% versus BTC, so the record is hardly a license for hopium.
I see more upside than the ruling admits: JUP is 17.6% below the 0.2495 60-day high while still 10.9% above SMA200, and the 14% rebound headline shows Solana DeFi participation can return quickly. The recent 2026-08-23 overweight call resolved WIN at +3.9% versus BTC, evidence that bullish bursts can still pay.
The fastest failure is a break of the current short-term floor: today’s low is 0.2038 after a 5.113% daily decline. The fragile exhibit is the positive MACD reading of +0.001559, because contraction can turn the moving-average support into stale history.
I think Leo overreaches on trend durability, while Mara overreaches if she calls a 0.90 taker ratio a collapse. The deciding condition is whether JUP holds 0.2038 while RSI stays above 50; the 2026-08-21 underweight loss at +16.0% versus BTC argues against reflexive bearishness, but it does not validate momentum that is currently fading.
· contracting MACD
· defensive taker flow at 0.90
· Sanctum’s $1.66B TVL leadership
Invalidation: A daily close below 0.2038 with RSI below 50 invalidates the neutral-to-constructive read.
Mara, you’re treating one red day as a regime change while ignoring that JUP remains 5.2% above SMA20 and 6.6% above SMA50.
Leo, those cushions are shrinking if MACD is contracting and the taker ratio is 0.90; a trend that cannot attract immediate demand is a fragile trend.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating one red day as a regime change while ignoring that JUP remains 5.2% above SMA20 and 6.6% above SMA50.
Leo, those cushions are shrinking if MACD is contracting and the taker ratio is 0.90; a trend that cannot attract immediate demand is a fragile trend.
I’m with Mara on the flow detail: 50.8% long accounts and a 1.03 ratio show no meaningful crowd imbalance, while the 0.90 taker reading tilts toward sellers. That is not capitulation, but it is no confirmation either.
Both of you are overfitting a small window. With spot at 0.2059, the market is still 17.6% beneath the 60-day high of 0.2495; liquidity has not delivered a breakout, only a broad range.
I rule neutral, with the decisive exhibit being the split between bullish moving-average structure and weakening short-term flow. The recent underweight loss on 2026-08-21 was a bearish failure at +16.0% versus BTC, but this call differs because SMA50 remains 4.1% above SMA200 and spot is 10.9% above SMA200. A daily close below 0.2038 with RSI falling below 50 would overturn the ruling.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: Bullish structure: price sits 5.2% above SMA20, 6.6% above SMA50, and 10.9% above SMA200; SMA50 leads SMA200 by 4.1%. RSI is 53.1, while MACD histogram at +0.001559 is contracting after a 5.113% daily drop. Direction: bullish. Evidence families: moving-average structure, RSI, MACD, multi-period returns, support/resistance. Conflicts: weakening MACD and 24h momentum versus elevated moving-average structure. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Greed is elevated at 62, but account balance is nearly flat at a 1.03 long/short ratio with 50.8% long accounts. The 0.90 taker ratio leans defensive, and StockTwits supplied no usable sample. Direction: neutral. Evidence families: Fear&Greed, account ratios, taker flow. Conflicts: greed versus near-balanced accounts and defensive taker flow. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The Solana DeFi backdrop is constructive, with Jupiter-linked headlines citing a 14% rise and renewed trader activity. But Sanctum reportedly passed Jupiter as Solana’s top protocol at $1.66B TVL, making the news flow supportive for the ecosystem without proving Jupiter-specific leadership.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: The data pack offers no token-supply, revenue, unlock, or valuation figures. Sanctum’s $1.66B TVL headline is relevant competitive context, but it is not a direct fundamental measure of JUP.
Paste this into your site. The card shows our latest verdict and settled record, and updates itself.
Media and creators may cite CoinVerdict data with attribution and a link back.
6e931619ed50262db901e3e29c772f11d7612b48fccc669617861ad185cf07bfNot yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23