JUP / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
JUP’s bullish structure meets an 8.73% daily drop and RSI 62
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-29 01:52 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bullish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — +3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +16.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — +6.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -3.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Neutral — -8.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Neutral — -5.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -6.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -8.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -8.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Neutral — -8.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Neutral — -8.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Neutral — -5.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +5.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +4.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +6.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — +4.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — +6.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — +0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Neutral — -8.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -7.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A close below $0.2208 with taker buy/sell below 0.87 overturns the neutral ruling toward bearish; a reclaim of $0.2534 overturns it toward bullish.. Cautious read: a break below $0.2208 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that “one red candle” is a theatrical dodge when the candle is down 8.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Mixed, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that “one red candle” is a theatrical dodge when the candle is down 8. Key support to defend sits near $0.2208. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number: JUP dropped 8.73% in 24 hours. But the tape is still built on higher ground—price is 19.4% above SMA200, RSI is 62, and the 7-day and 30-day returns are +8.7% and +13.4%; one red candle doesn’t erase that scaffold. The prior August 21 underweight call lost by 16.0% versus BTC, so the market has already punished stale pessimism.
Leo, that “one red candle” is a theatrical dodge when the candle is down 8.73% and taker buy/sell is only 0.87. The bullish scaffold sits beneath a price still 12.9% below $0.2534, while greed at 68 and 59.9% long accounts create a clean air pocket if crowded optimism unwinds. The August 21 underweight call was a LOSS at +16.0% versus BTC, but that fact does not make today’s crowded structure safe.
· crowded longs at 59.9% and 1.49 ratio
· contracting MACD histogram at +0.00479
· Sanctum leading Solana TVL at $1.66B
Invalidation: A close below $0.2208 with taker buy/sell below 0.87 overturns the neutral ruling toward bearish; a reclaim of $0.2534 overturns it toward bullish.
Mara, the 60-day high is still $0.2534, but JUP remains 14.4% above both SMA20 and SMA50. A contracting MACD histogram at +0.00479 is cooling momentum, not proof the trend has broken.
Leo, cooling momentum after a 14.4% extension is exactly where failed breakouts hide. Your RSI 62 is not oversold protection, and the 0.87 taker ratio shows the current flow is already leaning against your trend story.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day high is still $0.2534, but JUP remains 14.4% above both SMA20 and SMA50. A contracting MACD histogram at +0.00479 is cooling momentum, not proof the trend has broken.
Leo, cooling momentum after a 14.4% extension is exactly where failed breakouts hide. Your RSI 62 is not oversold protection, and the 0.87 taker ratio shows the current flow is already leaning against your trend story.
I’m with Mara on the flow read: 59.9% of long accounts and a 1.49 long/short ratio show bullish crowding, while takers favor selling at 0.87. Funding is absent, so nobody gets to claim carry pressure is confirmed—or cleared.
Both sides are overfitting a coin-level chart while the macro headline says Solana’s disinflation vote passed by a hair. That is not a liquidity regime change; it is a narrow policy outcome, leaving JUP’s 8.73% daily loss as the cleaner near-term signal.
I rule neutral, with the decisive exhibit being the clash between the bullish MA structure and the 0.87 taker buy/sell ratio after an 8.73% daily fall. This differs from the August 21 underweight LOSS because today’s pack shows sustained trend support—+13.4% over 30 days and price 19.4% above SMA200—alongside genuine crowding risk. The ruling turns bearish if JUP closes below $0.2208 while taker buy/sell remains below 0.87; it turns bullish if price reclaims $0.2534.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a bullish moving-average stack: price is 14.4% above SMA20 and SMA50, 19.4% above SMA200, with SMA50 4.4% above SMA200. But MACD histogram at +0.00479 is contracting, while price sits 12.9% below the 60-day high of $0.2534.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
The crowd is greedy at Fear&Greed 68, with 59.9% long accounts and a 1.49 long/short ratio. Taker buy/sell at 0.87 says immediate aggression favors sellers, though the single StockTwits message was bullish and is weak evidence.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Jupiter’s headlines are split: Sanctum overtook it as Solana’s top protocol at $1.66B TVL, while separate reports cite JUP gains of 5% to 14% as Solana traders returned to DeFi aggregators. The Solana disinflation vote passed narrowly, adding a broader token-supply variable without a direct JUP catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The pack offers no JUP-specific revenue, valuation, unlock, or token-supply figures. Sanctum’s $1.66B TVL leadership is a competitive signal, but it does not establish Jupiter’s intrinsic value.
522354a9d0c22785c4eb7a06318b70b48be3e580ca645ea0f5d83ea2548d36e2adde2046047c35b2be3d774c5e58080e229d71d404353d96fdaed9f2e1bcf4e2Committed 2026-08-30T00:20:00+00:00 · 91 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23