JUP / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
JUP sits at $0.16673 with RSI 31.2, but the downtrend still has the knife
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-19 01:51 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — +3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +16.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — +6.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -3.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Neutral — -8.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Neutral — -5.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -6.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Overweight — -8.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -8.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Neutral — -8.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Neutral — -8.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Neutral — -5.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +5.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +4.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +6.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — +4.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — +6.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — +0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Neutral — -8.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -7.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A close above $0.1770 would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.1632 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, the $0.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, the $0. Key support to defend sits near $0.1632. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I concede the ugly number: JUP is down 15.1% over 30 days and trades just 2.0% above the 60-day low at $0.1632. But RSI at 31.2 and a contracting MACD histogram say the selling engine is losing torque, while the SMA50 still sits 7.4% above SMA200; that’s a bruised spring, not a crater. My prior overweight call on 2026-08-03 lost 8.4% versus BTC, so I’m not pretending the tape owes me redemption—the current price is already pressing the floor.
Leo, the $0.1632 floor is only 2.0% below $0.16673; calling that a spring before it actually holds is hopium with a ruler. Your “losing torque” argument is contradicted by price sitting 6.9% below SMA20, 15.0% below SMA50, and 8.7% below SMA200, with taker flow still net selling at 0.93. The 2026-08-03 overweight call lost 8.4% versus BTC, and today’s chart has not earned a different verdict.
I think the bearish case has more room than the ruling admits: JUP is still 34.3% below the 60-day high of $0.2534, while 52.8% of accounts remain long and taker buy/sell is 0.93. The failed 2026-08-03 overweight call lost 8.4% versus BTC; that history argues the downside regime can keep punishing optimism.
The fastest failure is a sharp defense of $0.1632, only 2.0% below current price, followed by RSI(14) rebounding from 31.2. The fragile exhibit is the bearish moving-average stack: SMA50 is still 7.4% above SMA200, and the MACD histogram is contracting.
I think Leo overreaches by treating RSI 31.2 as a reversal, while Mara overreaches if she assumes the $0.1632 low must break. The deciding condition is whether JUP holds $0.1632 or closes above $0.1770.
· RSI rebound from 31.2
· defense of $0.1632 support
· contracting MACD histogram
Invalidation: A close above $0.1770 would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, the 60-day low at $0.1632 is a defined battlefield, and RSI 31.2 makes fresh downside increasingly expensive for late shorts.
Leo, “expensive” is not the same as impossible; the asset is still 34.3% below its 60-day high of $0.2534, and every major average above price is overhead supply.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day low at $0.1632 is a defined battlefield, and RSI 31.2 makes fresh downside increasingly expensive for late shorts.
Leo, “expensive” is not the same as impossible; the asset is still 34.3% below its 60-day high of $0.2534, and every major average above price is overhead supply.
I’m with Mara on the flow: 52.8% of accounts are long, L/S is 1.12, and taker buy/sell is 0.93. That is mild long-side crowding without funding data to prove a squeeze is forming.
The macro tape offers no liquidity rescue in this pack. Regulation headlines may help the sector eventually, but they do nothing to reclaim JUP’s SMA20 while the coin is down 2.3% in seven days.
I rule for the bear: underweight is the winning side. The decisive exhibit is the alignment of price below SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200—6.9%, 15.0%, and 8.7% respectively—backed by a 0.93 taker buy/sell ratio. This differs from the 2026-08-03 overweight loss of 8.4% versus BTC because today’s thesis follows persistent trend damage and near-term flow weakness rather than betting against the exhibited structure; a close above $0.1770 would invalidate my ruling.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a bearish setup: JUP is 6.9% below SMA20, 15.0% below SMA50, and 8.7% below SMA200, while RSI(14) is 31.2. Direction: bearish. Evidence families: moving-average displacement, RSI, MACD, multi-horizon returns, support/resistance. Conflict: SMA50 remains 7.4% above SMA200 and MACD histogram is contracting. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I see bearish crowd structure with Fear&Greed at 46, taker buy/sell at 0.93, and only 52.8% long accounts. Direction: bearish. Evidence families: fear gauge, account-side ratio, taker flow, social messages. Conflict: the L/S ratio is still mildly long at 1.12 and StockTwits shows 2 bullish versus 0 bearish messages, though that sample is tiny. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The headlines offer utility narratives—Polymarket launched on Solana through Jupiter integration, and several outlets frame Jupiter as a leading Solana aggregator. But the broader tape is still dominated by crypto-regulation and tokenized-stock policy headlines, not a fresh JUP-specific catalyst capable of reversing a 30-day loss of 15.1%.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Jupiter’s aggregator role and the Polymarket integration support ecosystem relevance on Solana. The data pack gives no token-supply, valuation, revenue, or unlock figures, so fundamentals cannot presently outweigh the price deterioration.
c607fd5074af0a53cdecd6e7ac06bed017558c7d8b3c9f8d8f976fe6e7af18c80f1b74c5d5aa8bd9fe0e079b811d2482b9bd27566afea1ff19e554ca5230c439Committed 2026-08-20T00:20:00+00:00 · 73 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23