GRT / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
GRT’s 7.9% daily surge meets a bearish long-term structure and crowded optimism
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-21 01:16 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Neutral — -5.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +8.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — +9.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -7.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — -9.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -7.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -4.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -3.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -5.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -5.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -6.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -10.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -6.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -9.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -8.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -7.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above 0.01948, the 60-day high.. Cautious read: a break below $0.01297 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo is treating a 7-day bounce as a regime change while his own numbers show price still 4.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo is treating a 7-day bounce as a regime change while his own numbers show price still 4. Key support to defend sits near $0.01297. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I concede the ugly exhibit: GRT sits 32.6% below its SMA200 and the SMA50 trails that long average by 29.6%. But the tape is starting to turn—MACD histogram is expanding at +0.0002438, RSI is a healthy 55.8, and the coin has gained 11.2% in seven days; the old downtrend may be stale baggage rather than fresh information.
Leo is treating a 7-day bounce as a regime change while his own numbers show price still 4.3% below SMA50 and 22.8% beneath the 60-day high of 0.01948. The rally is occurring with Fear&Greed at 72 and 67.4% long accounts, so +11.2% looks less like hidden strength and more like optimism already crowded into a damaged chart.
I’m more bearish than the ruling: the 30-day loss is still -8.9%, and the 60-day low at 0.01297 sits only 16.0% below spot. If crowded optimism unwinds, the chart has room to revisit that low before any durable repair.
The fragile exhibit is the bearish moving-average structure. MACD is expanding at +0.0002438, RSI is 55.8, and the 7-day gain is 11.2%; a momentum continuation could force the bearish call to fail quickly.
I think Leo overreached by treating one week as a regime change, while Mara overreached by dismissing the improving momentum. The deciding condition is whether GRT breaks 0.01948 or rolls back toward 0.01297; the settled record favors the defensive side, with 6 WIN and 0 LOSS among shown directional calls.
· short-term MACD expansion
· RSI 55.8 leaves momentum room
· broad crypto liquidity surge
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above 0.01948, the 60-day high.
Leo, your +11.2% is the headline number, but why ignore the -8.9% 30-day return? That bounce has not repaired the broader path.
Mara, because reversals begin while the rear-view mirror still looks bad. A 55.8 RSI and expanding +0.0002438 MACD histogram say the immediate tape has fuel.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(5)
Leo, your +11.2% is the headline number, but why ignore the -8.9% 30-day return? That bounce has not repaired the broader path.
Mara, because reversals begin while the rear-view mirror still looks bad. A 55.8 RSI and expanding +0.0002438 MACD histogram say the immediate tape has fuel.
Leo, the tape’s fuel is not clean: 67.4% of accounts are long and the L/S ratio is 2.07. Taker buy/sell at 1.11 is constructive, but hardly enough to erase that crowding.
Both of you are arguing inside an altcoin tide controlled by macro liquidity. The supplied headlines discuss CFTC regulation and a possible Bitcoin move toward $180,000; neither gives GRT a standalone liquidity engine.
Exactly, Dmitri. Until GRT clears 0.01948, the market is paying for a recovery it has not delivered.
I rule for the bears: GRT is underweight because the decisive exhibit is the 32.6% discount to SMA200, reinforced by 67.4% long accounts and Fear&Greed at 72. My ruling is overturned by a sustained move above the 60-day high at 0.01948.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: RSI 55.8, price vs SMA20 +6.5% but vs SMA50 -4.3% and SMA200 -32.6%, MACD histogram +0.0002438 expanding, 60d range. Conflicts: short-term momentum is positive while SMA50/SMA200 structure remains bearish. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear&Greed 72, 67.4% long accounts, L/S ratio 2.07, taker buy/sell 1.11, StockTwits 1 bullish vs 0 bearish. Conflicts: buying flow is mildly positive, but crowd optimism is already stretched. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The headlines lean promotional around GRT’s 2030 outlook, autonomous web3 infrastructure, and 2026 buying cases, but they provide no concrete catalyst or fundamental surprise. Broader crypto regulation and Treasury-buyback headlines are Bitcoin-centered, not GRT-specific.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack points to The Graph’s relevance to autonomous web3 infrastructure, but supplies no revenue, usage, emissions, unlock, or valuation figures. Fundamental support is therefore thematic rather than measurable.
dab6cebcc42731f9ed7b01c5a2dfb60acd854d638a872294d6f9f5e7d6eeec2f5c21c070ba128f2a35607134962360a82f87d1bc3398b693184c1393829130b0Committed 2026-08-22T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23