GRT / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
GRT’s 0.01403 rebound runs into a 37.5% SMA200 deficit
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-20 01:07 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Neutral — -5.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +8.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — +9.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -7.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — -9.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -7.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -4.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -3.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -5.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -5.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -6.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -10.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -6.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -9.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -8.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -7.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling fails if GRT decisively reclaims 0.01500 while RSI rises above 50.. Cautious read: a break below $0.01297 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your “spring” is still trapped beneath every major trend marker: price is 11.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your “spring” is still trapped beneath every major trend marker: price is 11. Key support to defend sits near $0.01297. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: GRT is 37.5% under its SMA200 and 30.5% below the 60-day high. But the tape has stopped bleeding—7-day performance is +3.2%, MACD histogram is expanding at +0.0001142, and price is only 7.9% above the 60-day low; that’s a compressed spring, not fresh collapse.
Leo, your “spring” is still trapped beneath every major trend marker: price is 11.2% below SMA50, 0.3% below SMA20, and the month is down 16.5%. A +3.2% week from 0.01297 support is merely a bounce inside damage, while 66.3% long accounts show the crowd is already leaning into the story.
I think the downside has more room than the ruling admits: a break of 0.01297 would expose a market already 16.5% lower over 30 days, with no visible support below that level in the pack. The 0.01403 price and +3.2% seven-day move can still be a fragile relief rally.
The fastest failure is a squeeze higher through the 0.01406 intraday high, because MACD is expanding at +0.0001142 and RSI 42.6 has room before overbought territory. My fragile exhibit is the bearish moving-average gap, which can lag a sharp reversal.
The aggressive desk overreaches if it treats 0.01297 as a guaranteed floor; the conservative desk overreaches if it treats positive MACD as a reversal. The deciding condition is whether price reclaims 0.01500 with RSI above 50, especially after the record’s five WIN and zero LOSS underweight calls shown here.
· Positive MACD reversal
· Bitcoin-led liquidity surge
· Long-crowd squeeze
Invalidation: The bearish ruling fails if GRT decisively reclaims 0.01500 while RSI rises above 50.
Mara, the 60-day low at 0.01297 held, and RSI 42.6 isn’t exhaustion. If sellers had control, an expanding positive MACD histogram wouldn’t be flashing at 0.01403.
Leo, MACD is momentum at the margin, not a trend reversal. The market still prices GRT 30.5% below 0.02014, and the 29.6% SMA50-versus-SMA200 gap is the wreckage you keep painting over.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day low at 0.01297 held, and RSI 42.6 isn’t exhaustion. If sellers had control, an expanding positive MACD histogram wouldn’t be flashing at 0.01403.
Leo, MACD is momentum at the margin, not a trend reversal. The market still prices GRT 30.5% below 0.02014, and the 29.6% SMA50-versus-SMA200 gap is the wreckage you keep painting over.
I’m siding with the crowd-risk objection: 66.3% of accounts are long and the L/S ratio is 1.97, but taker buy/sell is only 1.01. That is bullish exposure without aggressive demand, a thin foundation for a breakout.
The macro tape is helping risk assets—Bitcoin touched $70,000—but HYPE’s 11% jump shows liquidity is chasing the loudest catalyst, not necessarily GRT. In that regime, laggards can remain laggards even while the index sparkles.
I rule for the bear side: GRT’s dominant exhibit is the bearish moving-average structure, with price 37.5% below SMA200 and SMA50 29.6% below SMA200. The ruling is overturned by a decisive recovery above 0.01500 accompanied by RSI reclaiming 50; otherwise, a break below 0.01297 confirms renewed downside.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
The chart is still structurally bearish: price sits 11.2% below SMA50 and 37.5% below SMA200, while SMA50 trails SMA200 by 29.6%. MACD histogram is positive and expanding at +0.0001142, but RSI 42.6 and the 30-day loss of 16.5% leave this as a countertrend bounce.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Crowd enthusiasm is ahead of confirmation: Fear & Greed is 62, long accounts are 66.3% with a 1.97 L/S ratio, yet taker buy/sell is only 1.01. The tiny StockTwits sample shows 2 bullish versus 0 bearish messages, while GRT remains 30.5% below its 60-day high.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Headlines lean promotional, with forecasts, “5 Reasons to Buy,” and a Robinhood Crypto listing story in the local-news feed. The broader tape is supportive but not uniquely bullish for GRT: Bitcoin briefly reached $70,000, while HYPE gained 11% on a policy headline.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The pack supplies no revenue, usage, emissions, unlock, or valuation figures, so the fundamental case cannot outrun the chart. A listing headline may improve access, but the data does not establish durable demand for GRT tokens.
47a41a1598a6d7b1de473815920aa7bc2ba40d0f10805ae76d94fe9e202b45e43c48fe76cfdb380303016b74f46003f8e487fa46e3f85434b095720b4f300a33Committed 2026-08-21T00:20:00+00:00 · 88 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23