IMX / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
IMX at $0.0981 faces a bearish structure as RSI hits 25.2 and MACD deterioration expands
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-19 01:26 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +9.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -12.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -12.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +3.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -4.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -10.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -11.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -12.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -12.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -7.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -3.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -6.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.1001 with RSI above 50 invalidates the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.0964 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, the $0.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, the $0. Key support to defend sits near $0.0964. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I concede the ugly number: IMX is down 7.554% in 24 hours and sits 34.1% below its SMA200. But RSI at 25.2 and price only 1.6% above the 60d low of $0.0964 say the washout is already visible; that can make the bearish story stale rather than fresh. The recent underweight record had one LOSS on August 5 at +3.1% versus BTC, so this is no victory lap—but today’s oversold tape gives the rebound case more bite than those earlier calls had.
Leo, the $0.0964 low is not a floor; it is the nearest exhibit in a continuing breakdown. Your RSI 25.2 argument ignores that price remains below every major average—9.7% under SMA20, 18.6% under SMA50, and 34.1% under SMA200—while the MACD histogram is expanding negatively. The August 5 underweight LOSS at +3.1% versus BTC proves the call can be early, not that this structure has repaired.
I see more downside than the ruling admits: IMX is 37.7% below the 60d high of $0.1571, yet 58.3% of long accounts remain exposed with an L/S ratio of 1.40. If $0.0964 fails, that crowding and the 0.90 taker buy/sell ratio could accelerate the unwind.
The fastest failure is an oversold rebound: RSI is already 25.2 and price is only 1.6% above the 60d low of $0.0964. The August 5 underweight LOSS of +3.1% versus BTC is the fragile precedent—the tape can punish a bearish call before the larger trend changes.
Leo overreaches by treating RSI 25.2 as a reversal signal, while Mara overreaches if she treats the SMA200 gap as an immediate price target. The deciding condition is whether IMX holds $0.0964 or breaks it while the MACD histogram remains below -0.0004367.
· Oversold rebound from $0.0964
· Long-account crowding unwind already priced
· Unverified ecosystem catalyst
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.1001 with RSI above 50 invalidates the bearish ruling.
Mara, you’re treating distance below the SMA200 as destiny when the 60d low is just 1.6% away. A flush this extended can snap back before your averages even turn.
Leo, a snapback is not a reversal. The 30d loss is 21.3%, and the expanding -0.0004367 MACD histogram says sellers still have the steering wheel.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(5)
Mara, you’re treating distance below the SMA200 as destiny when the 60d low is just 1.6% away. A flush this extended can snap back before your averages even turn.
Leo, a snapback is not a reversal. The 30d loss is 21.3%, and the expanding -0.0004367 MACD histogram says sellers still have the steering wheel.
Mara, the crowd isn’t cleanly euphoric: Fear&Greed is 46 and taker buy/sell is 0.90. But 58.3% long accounts and a 1.40 L/S ratio create fragile downside if that crowd is wrong.
Theo, exactly—and there’s no funding-rate evidence to rescue the bounce thesis. With macro headlines focused on tokenized stocks and stablecoin accounting, nothing here supplies a direct IMX liquidity catalyst.
Dmitri, the absence of a catalyst cuts both ways. If sentiment is already fearful and price is pinned near $0.0964, even a modest ecosystem headline could expose how crowded the downside narrative has become.
I rule for the bearish side: IMX’s expanding negative MACD histogram, reinforced by price sitting below all three major moving averages, is the decisive exhibit. The recent underweight calls mostly pushed, with one August 5 LOSS at +3.1% versus BTC; this call differs because the current pack shows a fresh 24-hour -7.554% break, a 30-day -21.3% slide, and negative momentum expansion. My ruling is overturned by a sustained move above $0.1001 with RSI reclaiming 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: RSI(14) 25.2; price is 9.7% below SMA20, 18.6% below SMA50, and 34.1% below SMA200; bearish SMA50/SMA200 spread of -19.0%; expanding MACD histogram at -0.0004367. Conflicts: RSI is oversold near the 60d low of $0.0964. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear&Greed 46; taker buy/sell 0.90; long accounts 58.3% with an L/S ratio of 1.40. Conflicts: long-account skew could fuel a reflexive bounce; StockTwits has only 1 message, tagged neither bullish nor bearish. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Immutable-specific coverage is dominated by price-prediction pieces, while Forbes Australia reports Immutable scrapping crypto-gaming teams amid a “radical reshaping.” The Elowyn Marketplace launch is a constructive product headline, but the pack offers no adoption, revenue, or token-demand figures to offset the market damage.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack supplies no valuation, revenue, token unlock, or circulating-supply metrics. Immutable’s marketplace launch is a potential ecosystem positive, but the reported restructuring and absence of measurable fundamentals leave the fundamental case unproven.
ec1459831d87f22dcae661b99eced6fecb8362de16bed86b4f6a3a1086e6041b0f1b74c5d5aa8bd9fe0e079b811d2482b9bd27566afea1ff19e554ca5230c439Committed 2026-08-20T00:20:00+00:00 · 73 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22 · 2026-08-21