POL / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
POL’s 7-day slide reaches 16.8% as bearish moving-average structure outweighs a 53.8 RSI
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-31 00:27 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A+
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -9.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +22.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +3.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +4.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — +4.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — +2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +4.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +3.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -6.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -7.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -8.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained close above 0.1284 or RSI(14) above 70 invalidates the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.07008 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo’s 15.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo’s 15. Key support to defend sits near $0.07008. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I concede the ugly numbers: POL is down 16.8% in seven days and SMA50 sits 5.9% under SMA200. But RSI at 53.8 is nowhere near capitulation, price still stands 15.8% above SMA50, and the MACD histogram is contracting; that makes the recent damage look partly spent rather than a fresh cliff. I also acknowledge my side’s 2026-08-21 underweight call lost as POL returned +22.9% versus BTC, so this rebound risk is real—but today’s structure has not rebuilt the 0.1284 high.
Leo’s 15.8% premium to SMA50 is exactly the number hopium clings to: it coexists with a 7-day loss of 16.8% and a 30-day gain of 35.2%, meaning the chart is digesting an overextended surge. The contracting MACD histogram is still negative at -0.0003919, while SMA50 remains below SMA200; “not capitulation” is not a bullish signal. The 2026-08-21 underweight loss proves POL can rip higher, but it does not repair this broken medium-term average structure.
· short-covering rebound after the 16.8% weekly drop
· price remains above SMA200 by 9.0%
· prior 2026-08-21 underweight loss of +22.9% versus BTC
Invalidation: A sustained close above 0.1284 or RSI(14) above 70 invalidates the bearish ruling.
Mara, you’re treating SMA50 below SMA200 as a death sentence even while price is 9.0% above SMA200 and RSI is 53.8. A trend can be bruised without being buried.
Leo, the bruise is a 16.8% weekly drawdown, and your 9.0% SMA200 cushion is shrinking if momentum stays negative. The 0.1284 high is still 24.6% away, so the market has not reclaimed the level that would validate your recovery story.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating SMA50 below SMA200 as a death sentence even while price is 9.0% above SMA200 and RSI is 53.8. A trend can be bruised without being buried.
Leo, the bruise is a 16.8% weekly drawdown, and your 9.0% SMA200 cushion is shrinking if momentum stays negative. The 0.1284 high is still 24.6% away, so the market has not reclaimed the level that would validate your recovery story.
I’m not rescuing the bulls: Fear & Greed at 62 with only 44.1% long accounts, a 0.79 L/S ratio, and 0.95 taker buy/sell shows greed without aggressive long dominance. Funding is absent, so nobody gets to invent a crowded-funding narrative.
The macro tape gives POL no shelter in this pack. A 30-day gain of 35.2% followed by a 7-day loss of 16.8% is the sort of liquidity-sensitive reversal that punishes stories built on yesterday’s price.
I rule for the bears: underweight is the winning side. The decisive exhibit is the combination of a 16.8% seven-day loss with SMA50 5.9% below SMA200, showing failed momentum beneath a damaged trend structure. This ruling is different from the 2026-08-21 underweight loss of +22.9% versus BTC because current price is already down 16.8% over seven days, MACD remains negative, and taker buy/sell is 0.95; a sustained close above 0.1284 or RSI above 70 would overturn it.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: 7-day return (-16.8%), MACD histogram (-0.0003919), and bearish SMA structure with SMA50 5.9% below SMA200; RSI(14) at 53.8 and price above SMA20/SMA50/SMA200 conflict. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear & Greed at 62 (Greed), only 44.1% long accounts, L/S ratio 0.79, and taker buy/sell at 0.95; zero self-tagged bullish or bearish messages among 14 StockTwits posts limits crowd confirmation. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Direction: bearish. Polygon-specific headlines emphasize a continuing downtrend and a forecast toward $0.067515, while the broader headlines offer no direct POL catalyst. News support is negative but not decisive against the chart evidence.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Direction: neutral. The pack provides no token-supply, usage, revenue, upgrade, or ecosystem-growth figures, so fundamental conviction is unavailable. The case therefore rests on price structure and sentiment rather than fabricated fundamentals.
Paste this into your site. The card shows our latest verdict and settled record, and updates itself.
Media and creators may cite CoinVerdict data with attribution and a link back.
72648b49f997f057e27de4bc5682961e187732ec8138718b272c3ed128dfaa54Not yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23