POL / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
POL at $0.07392 sits 17.3% below its 200-day average as the downtrend keeps its grip
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-14 00:23 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -9.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +22.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +3.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +4.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — +4.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — +2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +4.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +3.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -6.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -7.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -8.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of $0.08532, the 60-day high.. Cautious read: a break below $0.06734 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your “near support” is doing heroic work: POL is still down 10.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your “near support” is doing heroic work: POL is still down 10. Key support to defend sits near $0.06734. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number, colleagues: POL sits 17.3% under SMA200, and that is a heavy anvil. But RSI at 43.8 is not capitulation, MACD histogram is still positive at +9.757e-05, and the price is only 0.3% below SMA20—this looks like a tired engine sputtering near support, not a fresh collapse. The underweight calls from August 3 and 4 both lost as POL outperformed BTC by 4.1% and 4.0%; the stale bearish call has already been punished.
Leo, your “near support” is doing heroic work: POL is still down 10.9% over 30 days and 13.4% below 0.08532, while SMA50 sits 15.1% beneath SMA200. A positive MACD histogram of +9.757e-05 that is contracting cannot rescue a trend this damaged. The August 3 and 4 losses prove relative strength can ambush a bearish call, not that the structural damage has healed.
The bearish case has more room than the ruling admits: a fall from $0.07392 to the $0.06734 60-day low is still 9.8%, and a break there would make the 17.3% SMA200 gap look conservative. The four recent underweight losses—especially +4.3% versus BTC on July 31—show that relative-strength bursts remain underpriced.
The fastest failure is a squeeze through $0.08532, because the recent record shows underweight calls lost on July 30, July 31, August 3, and August 4 by 3.8%, 4.3%, 4.1%, and 4.0% versus BTC. The fragile exhibit is the long-horizon moving-average damage if short-term relative strength repeats.
Leo overreached on the tiny positive MACD histogram; Mara overreached only if she treats the moving averages as an immediate timing signal. The deciding condition is whether POL holds $0.06734 or reclaims $0.08532.
· relative-strength burst versus BTC
· support break at $0.06734
· unconfirmed funding-driven squeeze
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of $0.08532, the 60-day high.
Mara, the 60-day low is 0.06734, just 9.8% below spot at 0.07392; the downside runway is narrower than the headline trend suggests.
Leo, a 9.8% cushion is not a floor. A break of 0.06734 would expose exactly how little your RSI argument is worth.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(5)
Mara, the 60-day low is 0.06734, just 9.8% below spot at 0.07392; the downside runway is narrower than the headline trend suggests.
Leo, a 9.8% cushion is not a floor. A break of 0.06734 would expose exactly how little your RSI argument is worth.
I’ll add the crowd’s dry joke: 58.2% of long accounts and an L/S ratio of 1.39 mean fear has not cleared the room. Taker buy/sell at 1.10 is supportive, but it is not enough evidence to call the flow regime clean.
The SEC delays remove a potential liquidity narrative rather than add one. With no funding data supplied, nobody gets to invent a squeeze catalyst.
Fair, Dmitri—but the price holding 0.07361 intraday while MACD stays above zero gives the rebound case a live fuse.
I rule for the bearish side: POL’s decisive exhibit is the bearish moving-average structure, with price 17.3% below SMA200 and SMA50 15.1% below it. This call differs from the August 3 and 4 losing underweight calls because today’s evidence combines that deep structural gap with a 30-day decline of 10.9%, whereas the current pack offers no confirmed funding catalyst to invalidate the trend. My ruling flips if POL reclaims 0.08532, the 60-day high, or if RSI rises decisively above its current 43.8 while price holds above SMA50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
The chart is bearish: POL is 2.5% below SMA50 and 17.3% below SMA200, while SMA50 trails SMA200 by 15.1%. RSI 43.8 and a contracting positive MACD histogram offer only a weak stabilization attempt. Direction: bearish; evidence families: moving averages, momentum, support/resistance; conflicts: RSI is above oversold territory and MACD remains positive; sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Fear&Greed is 29, while long accounts still lead at 58.2% with an L/S ratio of 1.39. Taker buy/sell at 1.10 shows some demand, but the crowd remains exposed to a price structure sitting 13.4% below the 60-day high. Direction: bearish; evidence families: fear gauge, account positioning, taker flow; conflicts: taker buy/sell is 1.10; sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The POL upgrade is framed around ecosystem growth, but the supplied headlines do not show a fresh catalyst translating into price strength. Regulatory headlines are also defensive: the SEC again delayed an innovation exemption and postponed its Reg Crypto meeting without a new date.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
POL’s migration from MATIC is intended to support ecosystem growth, yet the data pack provides no revenue, usage, supply, or valuation metrics to prove that thesis is winning today. With 30-day performance at -10.9%, the fundamental narrative is not yet overpowering the chart.
2686f6ed6f9ffa07e11b9efc77387ba05b593de13057bd16ba57e8b54671219953f40f609f1c3a40d35f95df8482a1a109627902af10da6eeb4433219b8978bcCommitted 2026-08-15T00:20:00+00:00 · 95 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23