POL / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
POL sits at $0.08037, with the 50/200-day moving-average spread still flashing bearish
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-21 00:16 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A+
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — -16.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — -13.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -15.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -21.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -9.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +22.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +3.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +4.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — +4.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — +2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +4.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +3.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -6.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -7.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -8.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained break above $0.09577, especially if RSI rises above 60 and the MACD histogram expands.. Cautious read: a break below $0.06734 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo is polishing a bounce into a broken frame.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo is polishing a bounce into a broken frame. Key support to defend sits near $0.06734. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number, Mara: POL is 17.1% under SMA200 and the 50/200-day structure is bearish. But RSI at 53.8, price above SMA20 by 2.0% and SMA50 by 3.5%, plus a positive MACD histogram of 0.0002367, say the immediate tape has already stopped bleeding; the old downtrend is a stale headline, not a fresh short trigger.
Leo is polishing a bounce into a broken frame. The decisive number is not RSI 53.8; it’s the 19.9% discount of SMA50 to SMA200, reinforced by POL’s 7-day loss of 5.1% and a contracting MACD histogram. A price sitting 16.1% below the 60-day high at $0.09577 has not repaired anything—it has merely paused lower.
· Extreme Fear at 25 could fuel a sharp contrarian rebound
· Price remains above SMA20 and SMA50
· No funding-rate data to assess leverage stress
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained break above $0.09577, especially if RSI rises above 60 and the MACD histogram expands.
Mara, if the tape were accelerating down, why is POL above both SMA20 and SMA50, with RSI above 50? The market is staging, not collapsing.
Leo, because a two-day-looking shelf does not erase a 19.9% bearish SMA50/SMA200 spread. You’re calling a countertrend bounce a reversal while the 7-day chart is still down 5.1%.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, if the tape were accelerating down, why is POL above both SMA20 and SMA50, with RSI above 50? The market is staging, not collapsing.
Leo, because a two-day-looking shelf does not erase a 19.9% bearish SMA50/SMA200 spread. You’re calling a countertrend bounce a reversal while the 7-day chart is still down 5.1%.
Leo, the fear reading of 25 is real, but I can’t give you a positioning washout: 53.3% of accounts are long, the L/S ratio is 1.14, and taker buy/sell is 0.93. That is fearful sentiment with a slight long bias—not the clean contrarian fuel bulls want.
Mara has the regime point. With POL still 17.1% below SMA200 and no macro-liquidity catalyst in the pack, a positive short-term MACD print is a candle in a draught, not a liquidity cycle.
I rule for the bears, and the single decisive exhibit is the 19.9% bearish SMA50-versus-SMA200 structure, backed by POL’s 17.1% gap below SMA200. I would overturn this ruling only on a sustained break above the 60-day high resistance at $0.09577, or if RSI pushes above 60 while MACD histogram expands rather than contracts.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: POL is above SMA20 by 2.0% and SMA50 by 3.5%, while sitting 17.1% below SMA200. RSI is 53.8 and MACD histogram is positive at 0.0002367 but contracting; the trend repair is incomplete beneath $0.09577 resistance.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Fear & Greed is 25, or Extreme Fear, while 53.3% of accounts are long with a 1.14 long/short ratio. Taker buy/sell is only 0.93, so fear has not produced clean buying pressure; positioning is modestly long rather than capit capitulation.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The POL-specific headline set is dominated by downtrend and relevance questions, including Bitcoin Foundation’s “Why POL Keeps Falling” framing and Coin Bureau’s 2026 relevance review. The broader headlines concern Cardano’s hard fork and Exodus workforce cuts, offering no direct POL catalyst in this data pack.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: The data pack provides no token-supply, revenue, adoption, or valuation figures for POL. That leaves the verdict anchored to price structure and positioning rather than a fundamental rerating case.
a934a3336dd608aa40ebc64449517ce5285eb6e2e09cde852ea5e553c381612c8493ea2a32b8f699d8d9f64cbb801351e81386c424ce90ba6ee879a91604b285Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 67 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25