POL / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
POL sits at $0.07927 with MACD deterioration and a bearish moving-average structure
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-23 00:14 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — -16.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — -13.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -15.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -21.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -9.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +22.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +3.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +4.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — +4.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — +2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +4.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +3.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -6.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -7.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -8.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained POL move above $0.09577, preferably with RSI(14) above 60, overturns the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.06734 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that 17.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that 17. Key support to defend sits near $0.06734. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: POL is 18.0% under its SMA200, and the MACD histogram is expanding at -0.0001091. But RSI at 50.3 isn’t a washout, and price remains 17.6% above the 60-day low; that makes this look more like stale downtrend pricing than a fresh cliff edge.
Leo, that 17.6% cushion is exactly the hopium you’re trying to sell: POL has still fallen 2.8% in seven days while the MACD damage expands. A coin sitting below the SMA200 with the SMA50 20.1% beneath it has no trend reversal—just a temporary ledge.
· oversold rebound from $0.06734
· unpriced Polygon adoption catalyst
· regulatory headline reversal
Invalidation: A sustained POL move above $0.09577, preferably with RSI(14) above 60, overturns the bearish ruling.
Mara, the market isn’t required to revisit $0.06734 just because your chart looks grim. At $0.07927, a neutral RSI and distance from the 60-day low leave room for a snapback.
Leo, snapbacks don’t repair a broken structure. POL is below SMA200, down 1.012% in 24 hours, and sellers are confirmed by the 0.92 taker buy/sell ratio.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the market isn’t required to revisit $0.06734 just because your chart looks grim. At $0.07927, a neutral RSI and distance from the 60-day low leave room for a snapback.
Leo, snapbacks don’t repair a broken structure. POL is below SMA200, down 1.012% in 24 hours, and sellers are confirmed by the 0.92 taker buy/sell ratio.
Leo’s rebound case lacks positioning fuel: longs are only 50.4%, L/S is 1.02, and there’s no funding-rate data to prove shorts are overcrowded. That removes the squeeze narrative rather neatly.
Theo is right about the missing squeeze. With no macro-liquidity catalyst in the pack and regulatory headlines adding friction, I’d treat rallies toward $0.09577 as exits, not salvation.
I pick the bear side, and the single decisive exhibit is POL trading 18.0% below its SMA200 while the SMA50 is 20.1% below it. I invalidate this ruling on a sustained move above $0.09577 or if RSI(14) clears 60 alongside improving momentum.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
RSI(14) is neutral at 50.3, but POL trades 18.0% below its SMA200 and the SMA50 sits 20.1% below the SMA200. Direction: bearish; evidence families: moving averages, MACD, RSI, support/resistance; conflicts: price is 2.7% above SMA50 and 17.6% above the 60-day low; sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Fear & Greed is 31, while long accounts are 50.4% and the L/S ratio is 1.02; taker buy/sell at 0.92 shows sellers still have the initiative. Direction: bearish; evidence families: fear gauge, account positioning, taker flow; conflicts: positioning is nearly balanced rather than heavily long; sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The news slate is dominated by investigations into why POL keeps falling and whether Polygon remains relevant in 2026. Crypto Clarity Act headlines add regulatory noise, but the pack provides no direct POL catalyst or fresh fundamental shock.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The pack offers no token-supply, revenue, adoption, or valuation figures to support a fundamental re-rating. Polygon relevance is discussed in the headlines, but that is narrative evidence—not proof of improving token economics.
753cbd412c927beb40e54ff0d2aebf2266c708fe8cce8e306d451a583bd20cd18624d818ee7811d0e765aa63f60423eb1e28fec5823b0c3f5024085df84084a2Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 100 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25