CoinVerdict

POL / The Verdict

generated 2026-07-28 00:24 UTC
$0.07
-5.64% · 24h
price as of 2026-07-28 00:24 UTC
Price source
📜 Archived verdict of 2026-07-28 — latest verdict → POL
The Verdict
Underweight

POL’s -7.7% gap below SMA20 and RSI 36.3 keep the downside in charge

⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-28 00:24 UTC

Technicalsignal strength Bearish C
Measures how strong the directional signal from price structure is. An analyst lists independent evidence families (trend, momentum, structure) from the data pack; code converts the count to a letter — 3+ families with no conflict = A+, 2 = B, 1 = D; conflicting evidence caps the grade at C; insufficient information gets no grade at all. The letter is signal strength — direction is shown separately. (evidence_rule_v1) full scales →
Sentimentsignal strength Bearish C
Same scale as Technical, applied to crowd evidence — fear/greed, positioning, and flow. 3+ independent evidence families with no conflict = A+, 2 = B, 1 = D; conflicts cap at C; not enough information, no grade. The letter says how loud the crowd signal is, not which way price will go. (evidence_rule_v1) full scales →
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction Shorts pay A
Measures perpetual funding-rate pressure — risk, not direction. The smaller the 8-hour normalized rate, the calmer the market: under 0.5 bp = A+, then A, B, C, D as pressure grows, F beyond 10 bp (extreme crowding). Who pays (longs or shorts) is shown separately. Read A+ as “calm”, never as “bullish”. (funding_rule_v1) full scales →
KOL Consensussettled-record quality Archive building
Measures the quality and strength of on-record KOL consensus. Only authors with 20+ settled calls count. The majority share sets the base letter (85%+ = A+ down to 55%+ = D), but few qualified authors cap it — under 5 authors we show the direction and withhold the grade while the record builds. (kol_rule_v1) full scales →

Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.

Track record
4W–0L–0P · 1 neutral · since 2026-07-15
95% CI 51.0–100.0% · n=4 · early sample
2026-07-28 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-04
2026-07-27 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-03
2026-07-26 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-02
2026-07-25 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-01
2026-07-24 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-07-31
2026-07-23 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-07-30
2026-07-22 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-07-29
2026-07-21 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-07-28
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-20 · POL price $0.08059 · BTC $63745.4
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-27 · POL price $0.07763 · BTC $65216
vs BTC
-5.8% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-19 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-19 · POL price $0.08118 · BTC $64708.7
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-26 · POL price $0.07682 · BTC $64416
vs BTC
-4.9% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-17 — Underweight — -7.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-17 · POL price $0.08145 · BTC $63739.1
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-24 · POL price $0.0766 · BTC $64928
vs BTC
-7.7% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-16 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-16 · POL price $0.08295 · BTC $64777.8
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-23 · POL price $0.07927 · BTC $66209
vs BTC
-6.5% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

stance change · Neutral → Underweight
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -8.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-15 · POL price $0.08495 · BTC $65000.1
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-22 · POL price $0.08004 · BTC $66588
vs BTC
-8.0% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →

The evidence
Bear evidence ✓ aligns with this verdict
Market state

coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read

Price
Price at verdict$0.07327 -5.6% 24h
60d high0.09577 -23.6%
60d low0.06734 +8.7%
RSI(14)36.3
vs 200d SMA -23.0%
30d change +3.1%
Funding (net) -1.04 bp/8h
Fear & Greed29 · Fear
Long accounts54.9% long

snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges

Read this ruling three ways

Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.

The Deliberation
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
VS
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
⚔ Key clashes
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
TO
Positioning Desk (Theo Okafor)
DV
Macro Desk (Dmitri Volkov)
JA
Risk Committee · Final Ruling
Chief Adjudicator (Aldrich)
DirectionBearish
ConfidenceHigh
HorizonWeeks (swing)
Key support$0.06734
Key resistance$0.09577
InvalidationA sustained move above 0.07365 accompanied by a positive MACD histogram would overturn the bearish ruling.
Main risksOversold rebound from 0.06734POL upgrade-driven catalystLong liquidation volatility
KOL Settlement Seat
Calls on record: 0 up · 0 down

Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind

Analyst notes
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)

I’m Kai Nakamura, and my chart says bearish: POL sits 7.7% below SMA20, 4.5% below SMA50, and 23.0% below SMA200, while the bearish SMA50/SMA200 structure is -19.4%. RSI(14) at 36.3 is weak, and the MACD histogram at -0.0008639 is expanding; the 0.06734 60-day low is the obvious downside magnet.

Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)

I’m Sofia Reyes, and crowd psychology is bearish: Fear&Greed is 29, taker buy/sell is only 0.77, and POL has fallen 8.4% in seven days. The conflict is that long accounts still hold 54.9% with an L/S ratio of 1.22, creating fuel for another flush; sentiment evidence is adequate across fear, positioning, and flow metrics.

Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)

I’m Ed Walsh, and the headline tape is mostly defensive: coverage explicitly frames POL’s continuing decline and its drivers, while the U.S. Senate has postponed the crypto Clarity Act. The token upgrade to POL supports the ecosystem narrative, but no item in this pack supplies a near-term catalyst strong enough to reverse the tape.

Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)

I’m Priya Anand, and the native-token upgrade to POL is the clearest structural positive because it targets ecosystem growth. Still, the data pack provides no valuation, supply, revenue, or adoption figures, so fundamentals cannot outweigh a price sitting 23.0% below SMA200.

Provenance
Report fingerprint
c93b099d1da4b2cbfb853fabec8b3613f1fa137cad3571a9d8af7f7f8c4324cb
UTC date
2026-07-28

Not yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain

SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.

Recent verdicts
Related verdicts