IMX / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
IMX at $0.1242 is caught below its 200-day average while momentum fades
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-31 01:29 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +9.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -12.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -12.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +3.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -4.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -10.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -11.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -12.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -12.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -7.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -3.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -6.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish call is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of $0.1571 with expanding MACD momentum.. Cautious read: a break below $0.0943 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, you’re polishing a 30-day rebound while ignoring the structural cliff: price remains 15.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, you’re polishing a 30-day rebound while ignoring the structural cliff: price remains 15. Key support to defend sits near $0.0943. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number, colleagues: IMX is 15.1% below SMA200 and the 50/200 structure is bearish. But the tape has already clawed 14.2% higher over 30 days, trades 5.0% above SMA20, and RSI at 54.3 is hardly a capitulation print; the long-term damage may be stale rather than fresh information. Yes, my side’s 2026-08-21 underweight call lost with IMX up 9.5% versus BTC, but today’s positive short-term averages and +0.0008828 MACD histogram make that setup less one-way.
Leo, you’re polishing a 30-day rebound while ignoring the structural cliff: price remains 15.1% under SMA200 and SMA50 is 19.0% below it. The +14.2% recovery has not reclaimed the 60-day high at $0.1571, and MACD is contracting; that is a weakening bounce, not proof the damage is stale. The 2026-08-21 underweight loss at +9.5% versus BTC proves this coin can punish bears, but it does not repair the current trend architecture.
I see more downside than the ruling admits: IMX is still 21.0% below $0.1571, and 59.1% long accounts leave optimism vulnerable if the $0.122 short-term area fails. The 31.6% distance to the $0.0943 low shows a wide downside vacuum.
The fastest failure is another squeeze like the 2026-08-21 underweight call, which lost as IMX rose 9.5% versus BTC. The fragile exhibit is the bearish moving-average structure: RSI 54.3 and price 5.0% above SMA20 could fuel a sharp rebound before the long-term trend matters.
The aggressive desk overreaches on the $0.0943 vacuum, while the conservative desk overweights one historical loss. The deciding condition is whether price breaks $0.122 and extends lower, or instead reclaims $0.1571 with expanding MACD.
· short-term squeeze above SMA20/SMA50
· long-heavy crowding reversal
· strategic Immutable X deprecation effects
Invalidation: The bearish call is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of $0.1571 with expanding MACD momentum.
Mara, the current price is 5.0% above SMA20 and 4.8% above SMA50; sellers haven’t even broken the short-term floor. A 54.3 RSI leaves room for a push toward $0.1571.
Leo, $0.1571 is still 21.0% away, and the coin fell 5.1% in seven days. A target that distant is hopium when the MACD histogram is contracting.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the current price is 5.0% above SMA20 and 4.8% above SMA50; sellers haven’t even broken the short-term floor. A 54.3 RSI leaves room for a push toward $0.1571.
Leo, $0.1571 is still 21.0% away, and the coin fell 5.1% in seven days. A target that distant is hopium when the MACD histogram is contracting.
I’m with Mara on the crowding wrinkle: 59.1% of accounts are long and the L/S ratio is 1.44, yet taker buy/sell is only 1.02. That’s optimistic exposure without aggressive flow confirmation.
Theo’s read matters, but the macro headline pack gives me no liquidity impulse to rescue a token sitting below SMA200. Until that regime changes, the 19.0% SMA50/SMA200 gap is the loudest signal.
I rule for the bears: the decisive exhibit is the 19.0% bearish SMA50-versus-SMA200 gap, reinforced by price 15.1% below SMA200. This differs from the 2026-08-21 underweight loss, when IMX gained 9.5% versus BTC, because the current pack shows a contracting MACD, 5.1% seven-day decline, and long-heavy sentiment at 59.1%. My ruling is overturned by a sustained reclaim above $0.1571 or a decisive RSI reading above 70 accompanied by expanding momentum.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Bearish. The price sits 15.1% below SMA200, while SMA50 trails SMA200 by 19.0%; the short-term bounce above SMA20 and SMA50 is weaker evidence. RSI at 54.3 is neutral, and MACD histogram remains positive at +0.0008828 but is contracting. Direction: bearish; evidence families: moving-average structure, momentum, RSI; conflicts: short-term averages and 30-day performance are positive; sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Bearish. Fear & Greed at 62 and 59.1% long accounts with an L/S ratio of 1.44 show optimism leaning ahead of a coin down 4.241% in 24 hours and 5.1% over seven days. Taker buy/sell at 1.02 offers no meaningful demand imbalance, while the single StockTwits message provides no usable crowd read. Direction: bearish; evidence families: fear/greed, account skew, taker flow; conflicts: sentiment is not extreme and 30-day performance is +14.2%; sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The headline tape is not a clean catalyst. Immutable X deprecation coverage and Forbes Australia’s report on Immutable reshaping its crypto-gaming teams create execution and narrative risk, while the price-prediction articles add hype without verifiable operating evidence. Broader headlines about Michael Saylor and hawala-to-Swift do not materially alter IMX’s setup.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The supplied news points to strategic change rather than a demonstrated improvement in token economics. Deprecation and gaming-team restructuring can weaken the ecosystem narrative, but the pack supplies no revenue, token unlock, usage, or valuation figures to establish a fundamental turnaround. I treat fundamentals as a bearish narrative overlay, not a quantified thesis.
Paste this into your site. The card shows our latest verdict and settled record, and updates itself.
Media and creators may cite CoinVerdict data with attribution and a link back.
433a5c0b508896447ed12b85980bb94b61db4bcc8711baa79da835a6ce855949Not yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22 · 2026-08-21