IMX / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
IMX at $0.1095 sits 28.0% below its SMA200 as bearish structure overwhelms the bounce case
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-13 01:10 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +3.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -4.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -10.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -11.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -12.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -12.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -7.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -3.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -6.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a decisive reclaim of the SMA50 or a break above the $0.1571 60-day high.. Cautious read: a break below $0.1046 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that August 5 LOSS is precisely why the bounce story needs evidence, not theater.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that August 5 LOSS is precisely why the bounce story needs evidence, not theater. Key support to defend sits near $0.1046. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number: IMX is 28.0% beneath SMA200 and the 50/200-day spread is -19.5%. But RSI is only 38.9, MACD histogram remains positive at +0.0006389, and price is just 4.6% above the 60-day low at $0.1046; the damage may be stale and a reflexive recovery can start before the moving averages turn. My recent underweight record also took a LOSS on August 5, with IMX outperforming BTC by 3.1%, so simply replaying that call is not enough.
Leo, that August 5 LOSS is precisely why the bounce story needs evidence, not theater. A positive MACD histogram of +0.0006389 that is contracting cannot overpower price sitting 10.5% below SMA50 and 28.0% below SMA200; the 4.6% cushion above $0.1046 is proximity to danger, not proof of support. The 30-day decline of 17.6% says the supposed stale damage is still being printed.
I think the downside has more room than the ruling admits: IMX is still 30.4% below the $0.1571 60-day high, while 61.7% long accounts and a 1.61 L/S ratio leave optimism exposed. The August 5 underweight LOSS of +3.1% versus BTC proves this call can get squeezed, but it does not erase the 17.6% 30-day decline.
The fastest failure is a defense of $0.1046 followed by a momentum snapback. RSI at 38.9 and positive MACD histogram at +0.0006389 are the fragile exhibits; one sharp recovery from the 4.6% distance to the 60-day low would make the bearish continuation look late.
I think Leo overreached on the positive MACD, while Mara overreached if she treats $0.1046 as already broken. The deciding condition is whether IMX holds $0.1046 or loses it decisively; the recent record’s August 5 underweight LOSS at +3.1% versus BTC keeps squeeze risk real.
· Support defense near $0.1046
· RSI 38.9 rebound
· Positive but contracting MACD histogram
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a decisive reclaim of the SMA50 or a break above the $0.1571 60-day high.
Mara, you’re treating the 60-day low at $0.1046 as a magnet when it can become a springboard; RSI 38.9 is not deep enough to dismiss a snapback.
Leo, a springboard needs demand. Taker flow is 0.95 while 61.7% of long accounts are already leaning the other way; that is weak sponsorship, not a clean reversal.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(5)
Mara, you’re treating the 60-day low at $0.1046 as a magnet when it can become a springboard; RSI 38.9 is not deep enough to dismiss a snapback.
Leo, a springboard needs demand. Taker flow is 0.95 while 61.7% of long accounts are already leaning the other way; that is weak sponsorship, not a clean reversal.
I’ll referee the crowd: the 1.61 L/S ratio and 0.95 taker buy/sell ratio show long-side optimism meeting inferior execution. Without funding data, I can’t call it funding-crowded, but the observable flow still favors the bear.
Both of you are ignoring the regime signal in the structure: IMX is down 17.6% over 30 days and 30.4% below the 60-day high of $0.1571. A contracting momentum histogram is a thin umbrella in a liquidity storm.
Dmitri, the immediate tape is stabilizing around $0.1095, and the latest candle closed at $0.1094 after trading as low as $0.1088. If $0.1046 holds, the downside thesis loses its clean continuation.
I rule for the bear: underweight is the winning side, and the decisive exhibit is IMX’s price at $0.1095, 28.0% below SMA200 while the 50/200-day spread is -19.5%. This call differs from the August 5 underweight LOSS because the current pack shows a fuller bearish alignment—30-day performance at -17.6%, long accounts at 61.7%, and taker buy/sell at 0.95—rather than relying on stale direction alone. I overturn this ruling on a sustained break above the SMA50 implied by the data, or if price decisively reclaims the $0.1571 60-day high.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a damaged chart: IMX is 2.4% below SMA20, 10.5% below SMA50, and 28.0% below SMA200. RSI at 38.9 and a positive but contracting MACD histogram of +0.0006389 offer a bounce setup, not a trend reversal.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I read fear, not capitulation: Fear&Greed is 29, taker buy/sell is 0.95, and long accounts still lead at 61.7% with an L/S ratio of 1.61. That crowded optimism against weak price action is the dangerous part; StockTwits provides no usable sample with 0 messages.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m cutting through the promotional prediction headlines. The substantive tape includes Immutable X deprecation beginning February 11 and Forbes Australia’s report that Immutable scrapped crypto gaming teams, while broader tokenization headlines add no direct IMX catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I find no fresh operating or token-economic data here that can offset the chart damage. The available company headlines point to restructuring and platform transition, not a quantified growth impulse.
a7ca7bb87d6500bb61fee5a47c925701755e8acd057d42592e3e4948d13b002fNot yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-12 · 2026-08-11 · 2026-08-10 · 2026-08-09 · 2026-08-08 · 2026-08-07 · 2026-08-06 · 2026-08-05