CHZ / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
CHZ’s 27.1 RSI is oversold, but price sits 26.8% below SMA50 and 58.7% below SMA200
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-21 00:48 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -6.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -7.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -5.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -6.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -7.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -8.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — -9.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -9.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -11.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -9.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -11.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -14.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -12.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -11.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: A sustained move above 0.01686, the approximate SMA20 implied by the stated 10.0% discount, would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.0143 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that “spring” is sitting beneath every major trend marker, and the market hasn’t even shown capitulation.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that “spring” is sitting beneath every major trend marker, and the market hasn’t even shown capitulation. Key support to defend sits near $0.0143. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number, colleagues: CHZ is 58.7% under SMA200 and down 26.5% over 30 days. But Leo sees a spring, not a corpse—RSI at 27.1, Fear&Greed at 25, and price only 6.1% above the 60-day low at 0.0143 mean the washout is already heavily advertised.
Leo, that “spring” is sitting beneath every major trend marker, and the market hasn’t even shown capitulation. CHZ is still 10.0% below SMA20, 26.8% below SMA50, and long accounts remain 50.8% with taker flow at 1.00; oversold is a condition, not a reversal.
· Oversold RSI rebound
· World Cup fan-token engagement
· Unreported funding or squeeze dynamics
Invalidation: A sustained move above 0.01686, the approximate SMA20 implied by the stated 10.0% discount, would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, the 0.0143 low is the obvious trap—if sellers had real control, CHZ wouldn’t be printing a positive MACD histogram of +0.0001656. You’re treating a contracting downside impulse like fresh acceleration.
Leo, contraction is not ignition; the histogram is merely less negative while the 7-day tape is still down 9.4%. A bounce from 0.0143 can be tradable without becoming a trend change.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 0.0143 low is the obvious trap—if sellers had real control, CHZ wouldn’t be printing a positive MACD histogram of +0.0001656. You’re treating a contracting downside impulse like fresh acceleration.
Leo, contraction is not ignition; the histogram is merely less negative while the 7-day tape is still down 9.4%. A bounce from 0.0143 can be tradable without becoming a trend change.
I’ll put the positioning on the table: 50.8% of long accounts and an L/S ratio of 1.03 are near-balanced, while taker buy/sell is 1.00. That’s no bullish flow confirmation, and funding is unavailable, so nobody gets to invent a squeeze.
The macro tape gives CHZ no liquidity tailwind in this pack. Fan-token headlines may decorate the narrative, but the chart’s 43.6% bearish SMA50-versus-SMA200 spread is the harder fact.
I rule for the bears, and the single decisive exhibit is CHZ trading 26.8% below SMA50 while SMA50 sits 43.6% below SMA200. The oversold RSI at 27.1 can produce a sharp countertrend pop, but my ruling is overturned by a sustained break above SMA20, specifically above 0.01686 if that level is inferred from the stated 10.0% discount to 0.01517.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Bearish. Evidence families: trend structure, moving-average alignment, momentum, support/resistance. CHZ at 0.01517 is below SMA20 by 10.0%, SMA50 by 26.8%, and SMA200 by 58.7%, while SMA50 trails SMA200 by 43.6%; RSI(14) at 27.1 and a contracting positive MACD histogram offer only a rebound setup. Conflicts: oversold RSI and MACD histogram +0.0001656 versus the dominant downtrend. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Bearish. Evidence families: fear gauge, account positioning, taker flow. Fear&Greed is 25, long accounts are 50.8% with an L/S ratio of 1.03, and taker buy/sell is exactly 1.00—fear is obvious, but positioning shows no decisive capitulation. Conflict: extreme fear can fuel a snapback. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The headlines offer activity, not a verified earnings-style catalyst: Spain’s World Cup win and Chiliz’s national-team fan-token burn program may support fan-token engagement. The reported 5% decline amid Base and Solana expansion cuts the other way, while the broader Cardano and Exodus headlines do not materially change CHZ’s case.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Chiliz is still building utility around fan tokens, with a World Cup burn program and expansion to Base and Solana in the pack. But the data provides no token-supply totals, adoption figures, revenue, or valuation anchor, so those initiatives cannot outweigh CHZ’s damaged price structure.
27bd8ff32fab227e16fa0b87f38d70158d4611253b19f8bae918db19f6c54f408493ea2a32b8f699d8d9f64cbb801351e81386c424ce90ba6ee879a91604b285Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 67 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25