CHZ / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
CHZ trades at $0.01332 with a 54.8% discount to its 200-day SMA
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-09-01 02:10 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -5.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -6.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -7.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -8.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — -9.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -9.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -11.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -9.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -11.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -14.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -12.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -11.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish call is invalidated by a sustained close above $0.01895, the 60-day high.. Cautious read: a break below $0.01163 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, the 54.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, the 54. Key support to defend sits near $0.01163. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: CHZ sits 54.8% below its SMA200, and that is a brutal chart. But at $0.01332, the damage is already visible in the price, while the 60-day low at $0.01163 is only 14.3% below; the positive MACD histogram and 30-day gain of 3.3% hint that the wreckage may be priced in.
Leo, the 54.8% SMA200 gap isn’t stale baggage—it is the trend, and the SMA50 sits 53.4% below the SMA200. Your 3.3% monthly bounce is a small green flare inside a chart that is still 29.9% beneath its 60-day high, with RSI at only 45.8 and MACD momentum contracting.
· fan-token catalyst revival
· broad crypto risk-on reversal
· short-covering despite unavailable funding data
Invalidation: The bearish call is invalidated by a sustained close above $0.01895, the 60-day high.
Mara, you’re treating the long-term average like a verdict carved in stone. CHZ held $0.01323 intraday and remains above $0.01163, so the downside is narrower than the headline trend implies.
Leo, a 14.3% cushion to the low is not support—it’s a ledge. The market is still 29.9% below $0.01895, and your ‘narrower downside’ ignores the 7-day loss of 4.9%.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating the long-term average like a verdict carved in stone. CHZ held $0.01323 intraday and remains above $0.01163, so the downside is narrower than the headline trend implies.
Leo, a 14.3% cushion to the low is not support—it’s a ledge. The market is still 29.9% below $0.01895, and your ‘narrower downside’ ignores the 7-day loss of 4.9%.
Leo, the crowd isn’t providing the squeeze fuel you want: 54.4% of long accounts and an L/S ratio of 1.19 show mild long skew, while taker buy/sell at 1.02 is barely constructive. Without funding data, I can’t claim shorts are crowded or that a squeeze is underpriced.
Mara’s case fits the liquidity tape better. Broad crypto selling already drove a reported 7.04% CHZ decline, and macro headlines about North Korean flows and platform regulation add risk appetite friction rather than a clean catalyst.
I rule for the bears: underweight is the winning thesis, driven by the 53.4% bearish SMA50-versus-SMA200 structure. This ruling is overturned by a sustained move above $0.01895, the data pack’s 60-day high, especially if RSI recaptures bullish momentum.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
RSI sits at 45.8 while CHZ is 3.1% below its SMA50 and 54.8% below its SMA200. The bearish SMA50/SMA200 spread of -53.4% outweighs the contracting positive MACD histogram of +0.00001619.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Greed is elevated at 69, with long accounts at 54.4% and an L/S ratio of 1.19. Taker buy/sell is only 1.02, so the crowd leans long without strong aggressive demand; StockTwits supplied no usable sample.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Fan-token headlines around Spain’s World Cup burn and the 2026 group stage are supportive, but they have not stopped CHZ from falling 4.9% over seven days. The more consequential tape is the broad crypto selloff, which coincided with a reported 7.04% CHZ drop.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack gives CHZ narrative catalysts through fan-token burns and expansion to Base and Solana. It provides no quantified adoption, revenue, token-supply, or valuation evidence strong enough to offset the damaged long-term price structure.
ef071d526740da422ae4977a9e84b23cac13ab6728a36790f88b0dcc984bd637Not yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24