CHZ / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
CHZ at $0.01424 is climbing, but the 52.7% discount to SMA200 keeps the verdict bearish
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-27 01:58 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -5.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -6.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -7.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -8.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — -9.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -9.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -11.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -9.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -11.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -14.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -12.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -11.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish call is invalidated by a sustained break above $0.01948.. Cautious read: a break below $0.01163 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, the 8.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, the 8. Key support to defend sits near $0.01163. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
The bear side’s strongest number is the 52.7% gap below SMA200, but that is a stale rear-view mirror when CHZ is up 8.1% over seven days and 7.6% above SMA20. RSI at 55.6 isn’t euphoric, and the contracting MACD histogram can simply mark consolidation before the move toward the 0.01948 high.
Leo, the 8.1% seven-day bounce is precisely the number that needs attacking: it has lifted price only to $0.01424, still far beneath the long-term trend. SMA50 remains 53.3% below SMA200, while Greed at 71 and 56.6% long accounts show optimism is already leaning into a weak structure.
I see more downside than the ruling admits: Greed is 71 and 56.6% of accounts are long while CHZ remains 27.0% below $0.01948. If the $0.01415 daily low gives way, the $0.01163 60-day low becomes an obvious downside magnet.
The fastest failure is a squeeze through $0.01948, because the recent trend is positive: seven-day performance is +8.1% and price is 7.6% above SMA20. The fragile exhibit is the contracting MACD histogram, not proof that momentum has already died.
The aggressive desk overreaches by treating crowding as a guaranteed unwind, while the conservative desk overreaches by promoting a short bounce into a trend reversal. The deciding condition is whether CHZ breaks $0.01948 or loses $0.01415.
· short-term momentum above SMA20
· crowded long accounts triggering a squeeze
· macro risk-appetite rebound
Invalidation: The bearish call is invalidated by a sustained break above $0.01948.
Mara, you’re treating the moving-average wreckage as destiny; price is above both SMA20 and SMA50, and the 60-day low at $0.01163 is 22.4% below today.
Leo, that $0.01163 cushion is not evidence of strength—it is the nearest historical escape hatch. CHZ remains 27.0% below $0.01948, and your momentum case has no expanding MACD behind it.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating the moving-average wreckage as destiny; price is above both SMA20 and SMA50, and the 60-day low at $0.01163 is 22.4% below today.
Leo, that $0.01163 cushion is not evidence of strength—it is the nearest historical escape hatch. CHZ remains 27.0% below $0.01948, and your momentum case has no expanding MACD behind it.
I’ll back Mara on crowding: 56.6% of accounts are long and the long/short ratio is 1.30, yet taker buy/sell is only 1.02. That’s a modest demand edge, not aggressive confirmation, and funding is unavailable rather than supportive.
The macro tape offers little shelter for a laggard: the pack cites a broad crypto selloff and an SEC custody-rule revival. Nvidia’s guidance may lift risk appetite, but it does not repair CHZ’s 53.3% SMA50-versus-SMA200 deficit.
I rule for the bears: the decisive exhibit is CHZ’s bearish moving-average structure, with SMA50 53.3% below SMA200. The prior record reinforces the call—six shown directional underweight calls were wins and none were losses. My ruling is overturned by a sustained move above the 60-day high at $0.01948 or a clear reversal of the moving-average structure.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
RSI 55.6 and price 7.6% above SMA20 support short-term momentum, while MACD histogram is positive at 0.0002944 but contracting. The bearish structure is intact: price sits 52.7% below SMA200 and SMA50 is 53.3% below SMA200.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Greed is elevated at 71, with 56.6% of long accounts and a 1.30 long/short ratio. Taker flow is nearly flat at 1.02, while StockTwits provides no usable sample.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
CHZ-specific headlines emphasize declines amid broad crypto selling and expansion to Base and Solana. The SEC custody-rule revival and Nvidia’s upbeat guidance are macro-risk inputs, not direct CHZ catalysts.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack offers no revenue, adoption, supply, or valuation metrics for Chiliz. Expansion references Base and Solana, but the evidence is too thin to offset the entrenched long-term chart damage.
473368275f057395d688b4f6a3fae0e8667c4c73a9d023c5d23cc3ea66925df664bb1ee510b85abc06eb9d0328d74bef4839ac43e76e5a63e96f0ad2d0a0301eCommitted 2026-08-28T00:20:00+00:00 · 93 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23