CHZ / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
CHZ at $0.01367 faces a bearish 200-day structure despite 30-day gains of 6.5%
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-29 02:10 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -5.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -6.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -7.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -8.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — -9.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -9.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -11.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -9.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -11.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -14.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -12.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -11.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above $0.01895.. Cautious read: a break below $0.01163 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that 30-day +6.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that 30-day +6. Key support to defend sits near $0.01163. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: CHZ is 54.2% below its SMA200. But the market has already dragged it 28.0% below the 60-day high, while the 30-day return is still +6.5% and price holds 2.8% above SMA20; that’s a battered spring, not fresh damage. RSI at 49.1 says the rebound isn’t euphoric.
Leo, that 30-day +6.5% is exactly the bait: zoom out and the 7-day return is -4.8%, with CHZ still 2.0% below SMA50 and 54.2% below SMA200. A coin can bounce inside a downtrend without changing the trend. The contracting MACD histogram at +0.0001666 makes your spring look more like a loose floorboard.
· Broad-market selloff reverses
· Reclaim of SMA50
· Long crowd unwinds after a rebound
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above $0.01895.
Mara, the 60-day low at $0.01163 is still 17.4% below spot, so sellers haven’t broken the nearby base. A neutral RSI of 49.1 leaves room for recovery before the chart becomes overheated.
Leo, nearby room isn’t evidence of demand. Fear & Greed is already 68, and 56.6% of accounts are long; the crowd is leaning into a chart that remains beneath both SMA50 and SMA200.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day low at $0.01163 is still 17.4% below spot, so sellers haven’t broken the nearby base. A neutral RSI of 49.1 leaves room for recovery before the chart becomes overheated.
Leo, nearby room isn’t evidence of demand. Fear & Greed is already 68, and 56.6% of accounts are long; the crowd is leaning into a chart that remains beneath both SMA50 and SMA200.
I’ll puncture both narratives: taker buy/sell is 1.01, effectively balanced, and funding is unavailable. There’s no flow exhibit here strong enough to validate a squeeze or prove crowded longs are about to unwind.
The broad crypto selloff is the macro tell, not background noise. CHZ’s -4.339% 24-hour move and -4.8% seven-day move say liquidity pressure is winning the short clock.
I rule for the bears: CHZ’s bearish moving-average structure is the decisive exhibit, with spot 54.2% below SMA200 and SMA50 itself 53.3% below SMA200. This ruling is overturned by a sustained break above the 60-day high at $0.01895, or by a clear shift in the moving-average structure.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a fragile rebound: CHZ sits 2.8% above SMA20 but 2.0% below SMA50 and 54.2% below SMA200. RSI 49.1 is neutral, while the contracting MACD histogram at +0.0001666 offers little thrust.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m reading greed without conviction: Fear & Greed is 68, long accounts are 56.6%, and the L/S ratio is 1.31. Taker buy/sell at 1.01 is nearly flat, so the crowd leans long without showing aggressive demand.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m cutting through the headlines: the 7.04% CHZ drop was tied to a broad crypto selloff, while expansion to Base and Solana is constructive but has not repaired the chart. The fan-token burn story is a narrative spark, not evidence of immediate price support.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I see ecosystem expansion through Base and Solana, plus a reported Spain fan-token burn, but the data pack provides no token-supply, adoption, revenue, or valuation metrics. The fundamental case is therefore headline-supported rather than numerically demonstrated.
f6b6fa76056de986e89cfde8070c126c1ad0ed201585969ba992c210342889adadde2046047c35b2be3d774c5e58080e229d71d404353d96fdaed9f2e1bcf4e2Committed 2026-08-30T00:20:00+00:00 · 91 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23