MANA / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
MANA sits 11.2% below its SMA200 while short-term averages offer only a fragile rebound
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-31 02:21 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -2.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — +1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -9.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -1.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained move above 0.08171 would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.062 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo’s “turn” is a candle-level mirage.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo’s “turn” is a candle-level mirage. Key support to defend sits near $0.062. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: MANA is 11.2% under SMA200 and SMA50 sits 15.0% below SMA200. But price is already 2.6% above SMA20, 4.5% above SMA50, and up 8.4% over 30 days—this is a battered chart trying to turn, not fresh damage. The 0.062 floor is 16.0% below spot, while the 0.08171 ceiling is only 12.0% away; the payoff map has room for a squeeze.
Leo’s “turn” is a candle-level mirage. MANA is still down 3.9% over seven days, the MACD histogram at 8.904e-05 is contracting, and the 60-day high remains 12.0% above spot. A price sitting below SMA200 with SMA50 15.0% beneath it has not repaired the trend; it has merely bounced inside the wreckage.
I see more upside than the ruling admits: spot is 0.072, already 4.5% above SMA50, and the 0.062 low sits 16.0% below while the 0.08171 high is only 12.0% above. The prior record supports the downside thesis, but four WINs and zero LOSSes can also make bearish expectations crowded and stale.
The fastest failure is the contracting MACD histogram at 8.904e-05 combining with a 3.9% seven-day decline. The fragile exhibit is the short-term average recovery: if MANA loses 0.07153, today’s low, the move above SMA20 and SMA50 looks like a failed bounce.
I think the aggressive desk overreaches on a squeeze without funding data, while the bear thesis has stronger structure. The deciding condition is whether MANA holds 0.07153 and then clears 0.08171; failure at the former favors the ruling, while a break of the latter defeats it.
· countertrend continuation toward 0.08171
· short-term average recovery
· crowded long accounts at 63.6%
Invalidation: A sustained move above 0.08171 would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, a 30-day gain of 8.4% isn’t a mirage when spot is above both SMA20 and SMA50. You’re treating the rear-view mirror as the road.
Leo, the road still slopes down: SMA50 versus SMA200 is -15.0%, and the seven-day return is -3.9%. Your rebound has no clearance above 0.08171.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, a 30-day gain of 8.4% isn’t a mirage when spot is above both SMA20 and SMA50. You’re treating the rear-view mirror as the road.
Leo, the road still slopes down: SMA50 versus SMA200 is -15.0%, and the seven-day return is -3.9%. Your rebound has no clearance above 0.08171.
Leo, the crowd isn’t providing the squeeze fuel you imply: taker buy/sell is 1.00, while 63.6% of accounts are already long. That’s directional optimism without aggressive flow confirmation.
Mara has the regime point. With no MANA catalyst and no funding data to prove a flush or reset, a 62 Fear&Greed reading makes the bounce vulnerable to liquidity turning.
I rule for the bear thesis: the decisive exhibit is MANA’s 11.2% discount to SMA200 alongside the -15.0% SMA50/SMA200 structure. The recent 8.4% 30-day rise is a countertrend rally until price reclaims 0.08171; a sustained move above that level overturns my ruling.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: MANA trades 2.6% above SMA20 and 4.5% above SMA50, but remains 11.2% below SMA200. RSI is 53.6 and MACD histogram is positive at 8.904e-05 yet contracting; the 0.08171 60-day high is the obvious overhead test.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Fear&Greed at 62 and 63.6% long accounts show a greed-tilted crowd leaning the same way. Taker buy/sell is exactly 1.00, while the single StockTwits message was bearish, so enthusiasm lacks decisive follow-through.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The headline slate offers no MANA-specific catalyst—mostly quote pages and generic explainers. Broader market items mention Michael Saylor and money-transfer history, neither supplying a direct fundamental impulse for Decentraland.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: The data pack provides no fresh adoption, treasury, token-supply, revenue, or ecosystem metrics for Decentraland. With no MANA-specific fundamental catalyst disclosed, the verdict rests on price structure and crowding rather than a fundamental rerating.
Paste this into your site. The card shows our latest verdict and settled record, and updates itself.
Media and creators may cite CoinVerdict data with attribution and a link back.
3a273064b683f35aa45a5e4247b977d783579d7982fce61ce6d335bb86e15434Not yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23