MANA / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
MANA sits at $0.07004 with RSI 49.8, while its long-term trend stays decisively bearish
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-23 00:40 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -3.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -2.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — +1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -9.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -1.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned if MANA sustains a break above $0.0884, the 60-day high.. Cautious read: a break below $0.0608 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that 1.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that 1. Key support to defend sits near $0.0608. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede Mara’s strongest number: MANA is 25.2% below its SMA200, and that’s an ugly headline. But RSI at 49.8 is nowhere near capitulation, price is still 1.8% above SMA50, and the Epic Games and Google Play launch gives this beaten-down token a live adoption hook rather than a dead chart.
Leo, that 1.8% above SMA50 is a foothold on a sinking ship, not a trend reversal. The SMA50 sits 26.6% below the SMA200, MACD momentum is contracting, and MANA is still down 2.3% over seven days; the launch headline hasn’t stopped the market from marking it down.
· Epic Games and Google Play adoption accelerates
· MANA reclaims $0.0884 on strong spot demand
· Broad crypto liquidity surge
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned if MANA sustains a break above $0.0884, the 60-day high.
Mara, you’re treating the SMA200 gap as destiny. At $0.07004, MANA is only 15.0% above the 60-day low, so the risk-reward can turn quickly if buyers defend $0.0608.
Leo, being close to support doesn’t make support strong. Fear at 31 hasn’t produced capitulation, because 53.5% of accounts remain long; that crowded dip-buying can break the floor.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating the SMA200 gap as destiny. At $0.07004, MANA is only 15.0% above the 60-day low, so the risk-reward can turn quickly if buyers defend $0.0608.
Leo, being close to support doesn’t make support strong. Fear at 31 hasn’t produced capitulation, because 53.5% of accounts remain long; that crowded dip-buying can break the floor.
Leo, I see no funding-rate data to rescue the long thesis. Taker buy/sell at 1.06 is mildly constructive, but a 1.15 long/short ratio says positioning is already leaning the wrong way for a clean squeeze.
Theo’s arithmetic is the point: without a liquidity impulse, a token 20.9% below its 60-day high is not automatically cheap. Macro headlines around the Clarity Act are unresolved and provide no MANA-specific bid.
I rule for the bears, and the decisive exhibit is the 26.6% bearish SMA50-versus-SMA200 spread. MANA’s $0.0608 60-day low is the invalidation trigger: a decisive break below it would confirm further downside, while a sustained reclaim of $0.0884 would overturn my ruling.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: MANA is below SMA20 by 0.7% and SMA200 by 25.2%. The SMA50 trails the SMA200 by 26.6%, while contracting MACD histogram and a 60-day range of $0.0608-$0.0884 leave the chart structurally weak.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Fear & Greed is 31, so the crowd is fearful rather than euphoric. But 53.5% of long accounts and a 1.15 long/short ratio show traders are still leaning long, creating fuel for downside if $0.0608 fails.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: Headlines are dominated by speculative $1-$100 prediction pieces, not verified catalysts. The Epic Games and Google Play launch is the one concrete adoption headline, but the broader crypto policy debate offers no MANA-specific lift.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: The data pack provides no token-supply, revenue, usage, or valuation metrics to support a fundamental rerating. Platform distribution through Epic Games and Google Play is constructive, but it does not outweigh the 25.2% discount to SMA200.
07036235ef7baa8ab3bcf54542e8e46c3b3fd70a34f86cef253677e746b287348624d818ee7811d0e765aa63f60423eb1e28fec5823b0c3f5024085df84084a2Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 100 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25