MANA / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
MANA’s 0.0733 price sits 9.8% below its SMA200 while greed reaches 69
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-30 01:51 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -2.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — +1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -9.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -1.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above 0.08171 with RSI remaining above 57.2.. Cautious read: a break below $0.062 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that 30-day +11.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that 30-day +11. Key support to defend sits near $0.062. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: MANA is 9.8% under its SMA200 and the 50/200 structure is bearish by 15.2%. But the tape is already dragging that anchor—price is 4.8% over SMA20, 6.4% over SMA50, RSI is a healthy 57.2, and 30-day performance is +11.1%; the bear case is staring at the rear-view mirror.
Leo, that 30-day +11.1% is precisely why the 69 greed reading matters: the crowd has already leaned into the rebound, with 63.9% long and a 1.77 ratio. Your SMA20/SMA50 bounce has not reclaimed the SMA200, and a contracting +0.0003836 MACD histogram says the rebound’s engine is losing cylinders.
I see more downside room than the ruling admits: 69 greed and 63.9% long leave the rebound vulnerable, while MANA is still 9.8% below SMA200. A break of 0.07299, the latest candle’s low, would expose the 0.062 60-day low.
The fragile exhibit is the long-term moving-average thesis: price is already 4.8% above SMA20 and 6.4% above SMA50, RSI is 57.2, and 30-day performance is +11.1%. The shown record supports the bearish instinct—3 WIN and 0 LOSS, with the latest underweight call a PUSH—but a sustained break above 0.08171 would punish extrapolation.
The aggressive desk overreaches if it treats 0.062 as inevitable; the conservative desk overreaches if it treats +11.1% as a trend reversal. The deciding condition is whether price reclaims 0.08171 or instead breaks the 0.07299 low while the MACD histogram continues contracting.
· short-term rebound above SMA50
· taker buy/sell at 1.11
· unconfirmed funding regime
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above 0.08171 with RSI remaining above 57.2.
Mara, the 60-day low is 0.062—18.1% below spot—while the 60-day high at 0.08171 is only 10.4% away. That asymmetry says the market has built a floor, not a cliff.
A floor is not proven by distance, Leo; your own 7-day return is -4.5%. Until 0.08171 is reclaimed, the failed rebound remains closer to resistance than confirmation.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day low is 0.062—18.1% below spot—while the 60-day high at 0.08171 is only 10.4% away. That asymmetry says the market has built a floor, not a cliff.
A floor is not proven by distance, Leo; your own 7-day return is -4.5%. Until 0.08171 is reclaimed, the failed rebound remains closer to resistance than confirmation.
I’m siding with the forensic read on crowding: 63.9% long and 1.77 long/short is directional exposure, while funding is absent, so no funding-based squeeze thesis can be certified. Taker buy/sell at 1.11 is supportive, but hardly a knockout.
The macro tape gets no rescue from this pack. With MANA still 9.8% beneath SMA200 and no fresh project catalyst, liquidity optimism is doing more work than fundamentals.
I rule for the bear side: underweight is the winning thesis, decided by the 15.2% bearish SMA50-versus-SMA200 structure reinforced by a 9.8% gap below SMA200. The call is overturned by a decisive move above 0.08171 with momentum holding rather than fading.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
RSI(14) is 57.2 and price is 4.8% above SMA20 plus 6.4% above SMA50, giving near-term traction. But the SMA50 sits 15.2% below SMA200, MACD histogram is contracting at +0.0003836, and the 7-day return is -4.5%; direction: bearish; evidence families: moving averages, momentum, trend; conflicts: short-term price strength versus long-term bearish structure; sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Greed is elevated at 69, with 63.9% of accounts long and a 1.77 long/short ratio; taker buy/sell at 1.11 adds mild demand. That is a crowded bullish lean without funding-rate confirmation, while StockTwits supplied 0 messages; direction: bearish; evidence families: Fear&Greed, account skew, taker flow; conflicts: taker buy/sell demand versus concentrated long exposure; sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The local headline set is mostly price pages and generic explainers from Bit2Me, Bybit, Binance, and The Block, offering no fresh MANA-specific catalyst. Broader headlines about a $1.1 million crypto card hack and consumer preference for control and micro-investing do not establish a Decentraland thesis; direction: neutral; evidence families: local headlines, market headlines; conflicts: none material; sufficiency: adequate.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The pack provides no fresh adoption, revenue, treasury, token-supply, or development metrics for Decentraland. Fundamental conviction is therefore unavailable from the exhibits, leaving the chart and crowding data to carry the verdict.
8d0ca2e7c254d25b6bdcc4c427c96150bf22f25f6d578814da49fe62f12376fa0071e3de26d06e3c755183e93ee239d43345bcb211c72f3e329230375244b41bCommitted 2026-08-31T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23