MANA / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
MANA’s 0.06465 price sits beneath a bearish moving-average stack, with RSI at 39.9 and the 60d low only 6.1% below
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-15 01:40 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -2.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — +1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -9.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -1.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned if MANA reclaims the SMA50 and sustains above it.. Cautious read: a break below $0.0608 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that 39.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that 39. Key support to defend sits near $0.0608. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number, Mara: MANA is 23.2% below its SMA200 and down 9.8% over 30 days. But RSI is only 39.9, MACD is contracting, and price is just 6.1% above the 60d low—much of the panic is already in the candle, not waiting ahead of us.
Leo, that 39.9 RSI is your entire lifeboat, and it is barely floating. The actual structure says the opposite: MANA sits below SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200, with SMA50 19.4% under SMA200; a contracting negative MACD does not erase a downtrend.
I think the ruling leaves room for a sharper rebound: RSI is 39.9, MACD is contracting, and taker buy/sell is 1.07. The 0.0608 low is only 6.1% below 0.06465, so a modest demand burst could make the 0.0818 high look less remote.
I see the fastest failure in the support exhibit: 0.0608 is close beneath a 9.8% 30-day decline, and 53.2% long accounts with an L/S ratio of 1.13 can add fuel to a downside break. The fragile assumption is that contracting MACD means reversal rather than merely slower deterioration.
I think Leo overreached by calling the damage priced in; RSI 39.9 is not oversold, while Mara overreaches only if she treats the 0.0608 floor as already broken. The deciding condition is whether price holds 0.0608 or reclaims the bearish moving-average structure.
· RSI 39.9 and contracting MACD could fuel a relief rebound
· sector-wide crypto headline momentum
· 0.0608 support could hold
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned if MANA reclaims the SMA50 and sustains above it.
Mara, you’re treating the 19.4% moving-average spread like a fresh shock, but it is historical baggage. At 0.06465, the nearby 0.0608 floor matters more for the next swing than a distant 0.0818 ceiling.
Leo, the floor is only 6.1% away because sellers have already dragged price there. A support level that close beneath a 9.8% monthly loss is a test, not a victory lap.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating the 19.4% moving-average spread like a fresh shock, but it is historical baggage. At 0.06465, the nearby 0.0608 floor matters more for the next swing than a distant 0.0818 ceiling.
Leo, the floor is only 6.1% away because sellers have already dragged price there. A support level that close beneath a 9.8% monthly loss is a test, not a victory lap.
Leo, I’ll grant the taker buy/sell ratio at 1.07 shows some immediate demand. But Mara has the cleaner crowding read: 53.2% of long accounts and an L/S ratio of 1.13 leave optimism exposed, while funding is not provided and cannot rescue the thesis.
Theo, the macro headlines are vapor unless they transmit into MANA demand. Trump’s crypto-CEO meeting and the conditional bank charter headline may buoy the tape, but this pack shows no liquidity impulse specific to MANA.
I rule for the bear side: underweight wins on the decisive exhibit, the 19.4% bearish SMA50-versus-SMA200 structure reinforced by price sitting 23.2% below SMA200. The nearest support is 0.0608; a sustained break below 0.0608, or RSI falling through 30, confirms the bearish call, while a reclaim of SMA50 would weaken it.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a bearish structure: price is 2.5% below SMA20, 4.7% below SMA50, and 23.2% below SMA200, while SMA50 trails SMA200 by 19.4%. RSI at 39.9 and a contracting but still negative MACD histogram of -0.0001446 offer stabilization potential, not a reversal. Direction: bearish; evidence families: moving averages, RSI, MACD, multi-horizon returns, support/resistance; conflicts: contracting MACD; sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I see fear at 34, but the crowd isn't washed out: long accounts still lead at 53.2% with an L/S ratio of 1.13, and taker buy/sell is 1.07. That is timid optimism sitting inside a nine-point-eight percent 30-day slide, while StockTwits has zero messages to provide a counter-signal. Direction: bearish; evidence families: Fear&Greed, account skew, taker flow, social activity, price trend; conflicts: taker buy/sell at 1.07; sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I find no MANA-specific catalyst in the supplied headlines; the local news is merely Bybit conversion pages. The broader crypto headlines about Trump meeting crypto CEOs and World Liberty’s conditional bank charter may lift sector mood, but they do not repair MANA’s chart. Direction: neutral-to-bearish for MANA.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I have no supplied MANA token-economics, adoption, treasury, or protocol-performance figures to support a fundamental re-rating. The evidence pack therefore gives fundamentals no actionable bullish edge. Direction: neutral; evidence families: none materially available; conflicts: absent coin-specific fundamental data; sufficiency: limited.
7f4f3759dc3bff03c3f4ac652714ebdbc42b380487e1a61ea955091048c359e7b9992f9aaddcb66d097da88829da3966f8938204256939eecd449461ccbccfffCommitted 2026-08-16T00:20:00+00:00 · 96 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23