CHZ / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
CHZ sits at $0.01246 with RSI 32.0, but the chart is still structurally bearish
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-16 02:07 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -5.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -6.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -7.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -8.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — -9.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -9.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -11.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -9.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -11.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -14.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -12.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -11.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A close above approximately $0.01285, reversing the reported -3.0% discount to SMA20, would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.01206 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that +0.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that +0. Key support to defend sits near $0.01206. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number, Mara: CHZ is 60.9% below its SMA200 and only 3.1% above the 60-day low. But RSI at 32.0 is already bruised territory, and the positive MACD histogram at +0.0001618 says the selling engine is sputtering; that rebound setup is more actionable than stale moving-average damage. Theo, the 1.06 taker buy/sell ratio gives the tape a small spark.
Leo, that +0.0001618 MACD histogram is contracting, not expanding—it’s a dying ember dressed as a reversal. Your RSI 32.0 argument also ignores the price sitting below SMA20 by 3.0%, SMA50 by 17.2%, and SMA200 by 60.9%; oversold can stay oversold while CHZ tests $0.01206.
I think the bearish call leaves a rebound underpriced: RSI is 32.0, spot is just 3.1% above $0.01206, and taker buy/sell is 1.06. The positive MACD histogram at +0.0001618 could turn a thin base into a sharp snapback.
The fastest failure is a break of $0.01206. The fragile exhibit is the contracting +0.0001618 MACD histogram, while 62.1% long accounts and an L/S ratio of 1.64 show optimism already leaning the wrong way; funding is not provided to validate any squeeze theory.
Leo overreaches by treating RSI 32.0 and positive MACD as a reversal, while Mara overreaches if she assumes a breakdown before $0.01206 gives way. The deciding condition is whether price holds $0.01206 or reclaims roughly $0.01285; the settled record shows eight recent underweight calls, all PUSH and 0 WIN/0 LOSS, so the historical edge has been defensive but not decisive.
· RSI 32.0 rebound
· support failure below $0.01206
· unconfirmed squeeze with 62.1% long accounts
Invalidation: A close above approximately $0.01285, reversing the reported -3.0% discount to SMA20, would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, the 60-day low at $0.01206 is only 3.1% below spot, so the downside runway is narrow relative to the damage already absorbed.
Leo, narrow runway is not a floor. A close beneath $0.01206 would turn your supposed base into fresh price discovery, and the 30-day loss is already -22.2%.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day low at $0.01206 is only 3.1% below spot, so the downside runway is narrow relative to the damage already absorbed.
Leo, narrow runway is not a floor. A close beneath $0.01206 would turn your supposed base into fresh price discovery, and the 30-day loss is already -22.2%.
Leo, I’ll grant the taker ratio at 1.06 is mildly constructive, but long accounts are already 62.1% with an L/S ratio of 1.64. That is hopeful crowding, not clean demand; funding is unavailable, so I won’t pretend the squeeze math is confirmed.
Mara’s structure wins the macro read: CHZ is 49.3% below the 60-day high at $0.0245, and the broader headlines are about Bitcoin exposure and an IPO—not liquidity flowing into CHZ.
I rule for the bears: the decisive exhibit is CHZ’s price at $0.01246, 17.2% below SMA50 and 60.9% below SMA200, with the bearish MA structure intact. The ruling flips if CHZ closes above the SMA20-equivalent threshold implied by the pack’s -3.0% gap, approximately $0.01285, while RSI recovers above 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: price below SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200; RSI(14) 32.0; 7d -4.9% and 30d -22.2%; bearish moving-average structure. Conflicts: MACD histogram is positive at +0.0001618 but contracting, while price is only 3.1% above the 60d low. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear & Greed 34, long accounts 62.1% with L/S ratio 1.64, taker buy/sell 1.06. Conflicts: modest taker-buying pressure and no StockTwits sample; funding is unavailable. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The local headlines are mostly conversion pages, with one Yahoo headline about World Cup 2026 Fan Tokens surging as the group stage ends. The broader headlines concern Unitree’s IPO and UBS Bitcoin ETF call options, offering no concrete CHZ catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The pack provides no fresh token-economics, supply, staking, adoption, or Chiliz-specific business data. The available fundamental/news evidence is therefore thin, and the World Cup fan-token headline has not translated into CHZ price strength.
571074e8582ac846602f490b283eb24c35ef21983ac38bd0860520f8e77a5571eaff5f24ed3adac83e409d856a55f50f8d212bab4f7befa37a3192bd7340acc9Committed 2026-08-17T00:20:00+00:00 · 89 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23