ALGO / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
ALGO’s 20.1% 7-day surge meets a 0.1049 resistance ceiling and crowded optimism
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-23 00:50 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Neutral — -8.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — -8.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Neutral — -5.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Overweight — -7.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Overweight — -9.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Neutral — -8.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Neutral — -8.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -9.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +7.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — +9.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +7.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +13.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +11.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +14.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +5.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — +1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The neutral ruling turns bullish on a decisive break above 0.1049 and bearish on a break below 0.0922.. Cautious read: a break below $0.0922 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo’s favorite number, +20.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Neutral, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo’s favorite number, +20. Key support to defend sits near $0.0922. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number: SMA50 sits 12.4% below SMA200, and ALGO is still 2.0% under that long-term average. But the tape has already climbed 20.1% in seven days, RSI is a firm 63.7 rather than an exhaustion print, and the expanding +0.001727 MACD histogram says momentum is doing the heavy lifting. The 0.1049 high is only 10.4% away, so the bearish moving-average relic may be stale. I know the 8 August and 7 August overweight calls lost 7.9% and 9.1% versus BTC; today’s positive MACD and mainnet-live catalyst make this a different exhibit set, though not a clean victory.
Leo’s favorite number, +20.1% in seven days, is precisely the trap: price is already 11.1% above SMA20 while taker buy/sell is 0.83. That is not healthy sponsorship; it is a rally with sellers pressing into crowded optimism. Fear&Greed at 66 and 61.8% long accounts leave little room for disappointment before 0.0941 rolls back toward the 0.07559 sixty-day low. The 8 and 7 August overweight calls both lost 7.9% and 9.1% versus BTC, and this pack still shows the same temptation to chase a bounce.
I see more upside than this ruling admits: a 20.1% seven-day move, RSI 63.7, and MACD histogram +0.001727 expanding can carry ALGO toward the 0.1049 high. The v5 Mainnet launch is a fresh catalyst, not merely recycled chart noise.
The fastest failure is a rejection below the current 0.0941 area after price has stretched 11.1% above SMA20. The fragile exhibit is crowd optimism—Fear&Greed 66, 61.8% long accounts, and a 0.83 taker buy/sell ratio—while the long-term average remains 2.0% overhead.
Leo overreaches by treating a 20.1% burst as durable trend repair; Mara overreaches if she ignores RSI 63.7 and the expanding MACD histogram. The deciding condition is whether price clears 0.1049 or breaks 0.0922 first. The settled record favors restraint: the 7 and 8 August overweight calls lost 9.1% and 7.9% versus BTC, while the 13 August underweight call won 5.0%.
· Crowded long accounts and Greed sentiment
· Failure below SMA200
· Broad-rally reversal
Invalidation: The neutral ruling turns bullish on a decisive break above 0.1049 and bearish on a break below 0.0922.
Mara, the sell-flow ratio is a warning, not a verdict: RSI 63.7 and an expanding +0.001727 MACD histogram show buyers still control the short swing.
Leo, buyers control the recent candles but not the map. ALGO remains 2.0% below SMA200, and the 0.1049 ceiling is close enough to turn your momentum story into a failed breakout.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(5)
Mara, the sell-flow ratio is a warning, not a verdict: RSI 63.7 and an expanding +0.001727 MACD histogram show buyers still control the short swing.
Leo, buyers control the recent candles but not the map. ALGO remains 2.0% below SMA200, and the 0.1049 ceiling is close enough to turn your momentum story into a failed breakout.
I’m with Mara on crowd fragility: 61.8% of long accounts face a 0.83 taker buy/sell ratio. Funding is absent, so nobody gets to invent a squeeze narrative.
And the broad crypto rally is borrowed weather. With SMA50 12.4% below SMA200, liquidity has not repaired ALGO’s macro trend; the v5 headline is a spark, not a regime change.
Still, the 20.1% seven-day advance and 9.4% thirty-day gain are concrete relative strength. A close through 0.1049 would force the bears to explain why a fresh mainnet catalyst cannot extend the move.
I rule neutral, with the bear case holding a narrow edge on structure and crowding. The decisive exhibit is ALGO’s failure to reclaim SMA200 while 61.8% of accounts are long and taker buy/sell is 0.83. This differs from the 7 and 8 August overweight losses because momentum is now positive and expanding, but the call is overturned by a sustained break below 0.0922.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
RSI is 63.7, MACD histogram is positive and expanding at +0.001727, while price sits 11.1% above SMA20 and 11.8% above SMA50. But ALGO remains 2.0% below SMA200, with SMA50 trailing SMA200 by 12.4%, leaving the structure mixed and resistance-heavy.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
The crowd is greedy: Fear&Greed is 66, long accounts are 61.8%, and StockTwits shows 20 bullish versus 7 bearish messages. Yet taker buy/sell is only 0.83, implying aggressive flow is leaning against the cheerful account mix.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The v5 Mainnet went live on 22 August 2026, while headlines also tie Algorand to a government-linked digital-asset push. The broader rally and narrative buzz explain part of the move, but the pack supplies no quantified adoption or revenue impact.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Algorand has a fresh v5 Mainnet catalyst and renewed institutional-policy narrative. The data pack provides no supply, usage, fee, or valuation figures, so the fundamental case cannot outweigh the chart and crowd evidence.
d42d45e4da6d90fa3989a8dc9c2582389a69a59957692325ea3cb8761bbb26d98dcc587613f29d0d57db9e6584607b513023911e8f47308581cffaaf7659dcc3Committed 2026-08-24T00:20:00+00:00 · 98 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24