ALGO / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
ALGO’s 0.08351 price sits just 3.7% above the 60-day floor as the trend stays heavy
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-22 09:06 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A+
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — +2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — +0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Neutral — -7.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Neutral — -8.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — -8.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Neutral — -5.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Overweight — -7.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Overweight — -9.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Neutral — -8.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Neutral — -8.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -9.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +7.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — +9.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +7.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +13.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +11.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +14.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +5.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — +1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: A close above 0.08466 accompanied by RSI(14) above 50 would invalidate the bearish swing ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.0805 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that MACD flicker doesn’t rescue a coin trading at 0.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that MACD flicker doesn’t rescue a coin trading at 0. Key support to defend sits near $0.0805. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number, Mara: ALGO is 18.4% below its SMA200 and the 50-day sits 13.3% under the 200-day. But the MACD histogram is expanding at +0.0003772, takers are buying at 1.09, and fear is already stamped at 33—this is a bruised setup where a Robinhood catalyst can spark a sharp rebound.
Leo, that MACD flicker doesn’t rescue a coin trading at 0.08351, below every major moving average and only 3.7% above the 0.0805 60-day low. Your rebound thesis depends on a headline, while the actual structure says sellers still control the map; 62.5% long accounts merely provide inventory for the next flush.
· Robinhood-driven demand surge
· positive MACD reversal
· broad crypto-market rebound
Invalidation: A close above 0.08466 accompanied by RSI(14) above 50 would invalidate the bearish swing ruling.
Mara, you’re treating the 0.0805 low like destiny. RSI at 42.7 isn’t capitulation, but paired with an expanding MACD histogram, it can mark the turn before the crowd notices.
Leo, a turn needs price confirmation. The latest candle closed at 0.0835 after reaching only 0.08466, and ALGO is down 6.6% over 30 days—momentum hasn’t earned your story.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating the 0.0805 low like destiny. RSI at 42.7 isn’t capitulation, but paired with an expanding MACD histogram, it can mark the turn before the crowd notices.
Leo, a turn needs price confirmation. The latest candle closed at 0.0835 after reaching only 0.08466, and ALGO is down 6.6% over 30 days—momentum hasn’t earned your story.
Leo’s 1.09 taker ratio is the only clean demand exhibit, but I’m not calling it a regime shift. With longs at 62.5% and a 1.67 L/S ratio, positioning is asymmetric enough to amplify a break below 0.0805.
Robinhood cannot repeal liquidity. Bitcoin below $66,000 and the Balance exploit headline keep the macro tape defensive; ALGO needs a broad risk bid, not merely a relisting headline.
I award the bear side the verdict, and the decisive exhibit is ALGO’s bearish moving-average structure: SMA50 is 13.3% below SMA200 while price is 18.4% below SMA200. I would overturn this ruling only if ALGO closes above 0.08466 and RSI(14) reclaims 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: price below SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200; bearish SMA50/SMA200 structure at -13.3%; RSI(14) 42.7; 30-day return -6.6%. Conflicts: MACD histogram is positive and expanding at +0.0003772, but price remains 18.4% below SMA200. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear & Greed at 33; long accounts at 62.5% with a 1.67 long/short ratio; taker buy/sell at 1.09. Conflicts: modest taker buying counters the fear reading, while crowded longs leave downside fuel. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Robinhood-related headlines offer a possible liquidity and visibility catalyst, while coverage of stablecoin aid highlights Algorand’s payments narrative. The broader tape is less forgiving: Bitcoin is under $66,000, and a $1 million exploit erased 99% of Balance’s stablecoin value.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Algorand’s payments and stablecoin-use case is the strongest fundamental narrative in the pack. Quantum-encryption risk is a sector-wide threat, while the data pack provides no token-supply, revenue, adoption, or valuation figures to justify a multi-month bullish case.
f5cecc2a3ff2fbd8fa50d80f4e54587b0929b8d94c04a98f10643699f7c4b661d60befb007b8b2c9bb2f3e860a595495bb4427a42c1d8f8851947ca5b9c4caf9Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 98 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25