ALGO / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
ALGO’s +9.5% weekly rebound meets a bearish SMA structure and 61.9% long-account crowding
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-26 00:51 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Neutral — -8.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — -8.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Neutral — -5.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Overweight — -7.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Overweight — -9.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Neutral — -8.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Neutral — -8.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Overweight — -9.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +7.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — +9.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +7.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +13.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +11.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +14.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — +5.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — +1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.1049 would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.07559 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, the $0.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, the $0. Key support to defend sits near $0.07559. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly exhibit: SMA50 is 12.2% under SMA200, and ALGO is down 3.125% over 24 hours. But that structure is stale overhead while price has climbed 9.5% in seven days and 12.3% in 30 days, sitting above both SMA20 and SMA50; the market is repairing, not collapsing.
Leo, the $0.08987 price is still 6.4% beneath SMA200, so your “repair” remains below the long-term trend line. Worse, RSI at 56.0 is nowhere near washed out, MACD momentum is contracting, and taker buy/sell at 0.90 attacks the claim that this rebound has force behind it.
I think the downside thesis still understates the rebound: ALGO is up 12.3% over 30 days and sits $0.01431 above the 60-day low of $0.07559. A break through $0.1049 could expose how much upside the current bearish structure has mispriced.
I see the fastest failure in the long-term trend exhibit: SMA50 is 12.2% below SMA200, and price is still 6.4% under SMA200. The $0.07559 low is the fragile floor; losing it would make the recent +9.5% seven-day move look like exhausted reflex buying.
I think the aggressive desk overreaches by treating distance from $0.07559 as upside evidence; the conservative desk overreaches if it ignores the +12.3% 30-day move. The deciding condition is whether ALGO reclaims $0.1049 or instead breaks $0.07559; the settled record favors restraint, with 2 WIN and 0 LOSS on shown directional calls.
· reclaim of $0.1049
· broad crypto-rally continuation
· government-linked digital-asset narrative
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.1049 would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, the 60-day low is $0.07559, 18.7% below spot, while the 60-day high is $0.1049, only 14.5% above. That asymmetry leaves room for the rebound to keep challenging resistance.
Leo, room is not evidence. Fear&Greed at 65 and 61.9% long accounts show the easy optimism is already present, while price remains under SMA200.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day low is $0.07559, 18.7% below spot, while the 60-day high is $0.1049, only 14.5% above. That asymmetry leaves room for the rebound to keep challenging resistance.
Leo, room is not evidence. Fear&Greed at 65 and 61.9% long accounts show the easy optimism is already present, while price remains under SMA200.
I’m with Mara on the flow tape: a 1.63 long/short account ratio meets a 0.90 taker buy/sell ratio. Funding is absent, so nobody gets to invent a crowding premium—but the available flow data still fails to validate the long-heavy story.
The sector headlines may lift the tide, but they do not specifically reprice Algorand’s liquidity. Until ALGO clears $0.1049 or reclaims SMA200, this is a macro-sensitive bounce under a heavy ceiling.
I rule for the bear side: underweight is the stronger call because ALGO remains 6.4% below SMA200 while long accounts are 61.9% and taker buy/sell is 0.90. The ruling is overturned by a decisive reclaim above the pack’s $0.1049 60-day high; failure to hold the $0.07559 60-day low would instead reinforce it.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see ALGO at $0.08987, above SMA20 by 5.7% and SMA50 by 6.6%, but still 6.4% below SMA200. RSI is 56.0 while the MACD histogram is only +0.001 and contracting; the SMA50 sits 12.2% below SMA200, so the bounce is fighting the larger trend.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I see greed at 65 and long accounts at 61.9%, with a 1.63 long/short ratio. Taker buy/sell is 0.90, which says the crowd is leaning long while aggressive flow is not confirming it; StockTwits is too sparse to matter, at 1 bullish versus 1 bearish among 3 messages.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I see a broad crypto-rally backdrop, Robinhood’s Algorand relisting, and government-linked digital-asset narrative buzz. The U.S. banking blockchain-network plan and Zerohash’s OCC charter effort are sector headlines, not direct evidence of ALGO cash-flow or protocol demand.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I have no token-economics, adoption, revenue, or supply metrics in this pack to support a durable fundamental rerating. The available fundamental case is therefore narrative-led, with ALGO still 14.5% below its 60-day high of $0.1049.
d3fbcab49622e77d4a2f722a390a7e3d258a95e48d6b6dcad9304d0faa60ecc9650479c8d662b50f512b6a5ccfb1242fb411c562a0dabecc0eed582b87132f9fCommitted 2026-08-27T00:20:00+00:00 · 93 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23