SEI / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SEI’s 0.04546 price sits 18.8% below its SMA200 while greed reaches 69
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-30 01:08 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — +1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -8.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -2.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -7.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -5.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -4.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of 0.05157, the 60-day high.. Cautious read: a break below $0.03819 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: I’m Mara Frost.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I’m Mara Frost. Key support to defend sits near $0.03819. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’m Leo Vance. Yes, the SMA50 is 21.5% under the SMA200—that’s the bear’s cleanest number—but it’s stale overhead wreckage, not fresh selling pressure. Price is 4.1% above SMA20 and 3.5% above SMA50, RSI is a healthy 53.5, and the 30-day gain is 9.5%; the rebound has already cleared the short-term runway.
I’m Mara Frost. Leo calls the 21.5% moving-average fracture stale because the price has bounced inside it, but the distance to the 60-day high is still 11.9%, while the MACD histogram is contracting. A 9.5% monthly rise does not repair a long-term downtrend; it can simply make crowded optimism more vulnerable.
I’m the aggressive desk. The ruling underprices the rebound: price is 4.1% above SMA20, 3.5% above SMA50, and RSI is only 53.5, leaving room before momentum looks overheated. If 0.05157 gives way, the bearish 18.8% SMA200 gap could compress quickly.
I’m the conservative desk. The fastest failure is a break of 0.04541, because the nearest structural cushion is then the 60-day low at 0.03819, 18.9% below. The most fragile exhibit is the 9.5% 30-day gain against a contracting MACD histogram and 65.2% long-account crowding.
I’m the neutral desk. Leo overreached on short-term strength; Mara overreached only if she treats the long-term trend as an immediate collapse. The deciding condition is whether SEI holds 0.04541 or breaks it toward 0.03819; the settled record favors underweight, with 2 WIN, 0 LOSS, and three PUSH outcomes among resolved calls.
· short-term rebound above 0.05157
· payment and tokenization adoption accelerating
· crowding unwinds without price breakdown
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of 0.05157, the 60-day high.
I’m Theo Okafor. Leo, the 65.2% long-account share and 1.88 L/S ratio are not stale—they’re live crowding data. Taker flow at 1.03 barely offsets that imbalance, and funding is unavailable, so the bullish positioning case has no confirmation.
Mara, the 60-day high at 0.05157 is a map, not a verdict. SEI is holding 0.04541 intraday low territory while staying above both SMA20 and SMA50; that structure gives the rebound more substance than your headline distance suggests.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
I’m Theo Okafor. Leo, the 65.2% long-account share and 1.88 L/S ratio are not stale—they’re live crowding data. Taker flow at 1.03 barely offsets that imbalance, and funding is unavailable, so the bullish positioning case has no confirmation.
Mara, the 60-day high at 0.05157 is a map, not a verdict. SEI is holding 0.04541 intraday low territory while staying above both SMA20 and SMA50; that structure gives the rebound more substance than your headline distance suggests.
Leo, holding 0.04541 is hardly a fortress when the 60-day low is 0.03819 and the price is still beneath SMA200. The same chart you call a runway shows a 7-day loss of 5.6% and fading MACD momentum.
I’m Dmitri Volkov. The payment headlines are liquidity-sensitive stories, and the broader tape just showed a crypto-card hack causing a 49% token collapse. Without a quantified macro or flow catalyst, the 0.04546 rebound is living on fragile appetite.
I’m Judge Aldrich: the bear side wins, decided by SEI’s 21.5% SMA50-versus-SMA200 bearish structure. The 65.2% long-account share with a 1.88 L/S ratio makes the near-term upside thesis crowded, while the contracting MACD histogram adds pressure. My ruling is overturned if SEI reclaims and holds the 60-day high at 0.05157, or if the long-term moving-average structure materially reverses.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I’m Kai Nakamura. SEI is above SMA20 by 4.1% and SMA50 by 3.5%, but remains 18.8% below SMA200; the SMA50 sits 21.5% below SMA200. RSI(14) at 53.5 is neutral, while the contracting MACD histogram at +0.0003235 warns that the rebound is losing thrust.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m Sofia Reyes. Greed is elevated at 69, and long accounts lead 65.2% with an L/S ratio of 1.88; that’s a crowd leaning the same way after a 9.5% 30-day gain. Taker buy/sell at 1.03 is only marginally constructive, and StockTwits provides no usable sample from 0 messages.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m Ed Walsh. Headlines point to Mastercard activity, tokenized stocks, and Korean payments integration around Sei, but the pack supplies no quantified adoption, revenue, or launch impact. The broader tape’s $1.1 million crypto-card hack and 49% token collapse reinforce how quickly crypto-payment narratives can sour.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I’m Priya Anand. The data names ecosystem integrations and a prospective Giga upgrade, but gives no token-supply, unlock, valuation, fee, or usage figures. That leaves the fundamental case narrative-heavy beside a chart still 18.8% beneath SMA200.
c7918d4c5e3662717a001f77162c6e6e09211b4d74a4743d159a83e8535303e20071e3de26d06e3c755183e93ee239d43345bcb211c72f3e329230375244b41bCommitted 2026-08-31T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22 · 2026-08-21