SEI / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SEI sits at $0.04039 with RSI 35.8, but its bearish trend structure still dominates
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-15 00:58 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — +1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -8.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -2.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -7.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -5.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -4.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A decisive break below $0.03937 followed by recovery above that level would invalidate the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.03937 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo’s “turn” is a match struck in a flooded room.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo’s “turn” is a match struck in a flooded room. Key support to defend sits near $0.03937. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number: SEI is 31.4% below its SMA200 and only 2.5% above the 60-day low at $0.03937. But RSI at 35.8 is washed-out territory, and the expanding +0.0001941 MACD histogram says the engine is trying to turn before the crowd notices. A payments integration in Korea gives this battered chart a spark, not just hopium fumes.
Leo’s “turn” is a match struck in a flooded room. The price is still 10.7% below SMA50, 14.2% lower over 30 days, and takers are buying only 0.90 for every unit sold; a positive MACD histogram beside that structure is a bounce annotation, not a reversal. At $0.04039, SEI is pressing the $0.03937 floor, exactly where failed-bounce stories tend to become fresh downside.
I see more downside than the ruling admits: SEI is 32.4% below the 60-day high and only 2.5% above $0.03937, while the 14.2% 30-day slide can accelerate if that floor fails. The prior record supports this bearish instinct: underweight calls produced 2 WIN and 0 LOSS, though five intervening calls were PUSHes.
The fastest failure is a reflexive rebound from $0.03937: RSI is already 35.8 and the MACD histogram is expanding at +0.0001941. If that support holds, the ruling’s trend exhibit is the fragile one because oversold momentum can snap upward before the moving averages turn.
Leo overreached by treating a positive MACD histogram as a reversal, while Mara overreaches if she treats $0.03937 as already broken. The deciding condition is whether SEI holds $0.03937 or breaks it decisively.
· oversold rebound from $0.03937
· expanding positive MACD histogram
· Korea payments integration improving sentiment
Invalidation: A decisive break below $0.03937 followed by recovery above that level would invalidate the bearish ruling.
Mara, you’re treating the 60-day low at $0.03937 as destiny, but it has held so far and sits just 2.5% below $0.04039. If MACD is expanding while RSI is 35.8, why assume sellers get a clean break?
Leo, because the floor is being tested from beneath a collapsing staircase: SMA50 is 23.2% under SMA200, and the 30-day loss is 14.2%. A floor that close is fragile support, not proof of demand.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating the 60-day low at $0.03937 as destiny, but it has held so far and sits just 2.5% below $0.04039. If MACD is expanding while RSI is 35.8, why assume sellers get a clean break?
Leo, because the floor is being tested from beneath a collapsing staircase: SMA50 is 23.2% under SMA200, and the 30-day loss is 14.2%. A floor that close is fragile support, not proof of demand.
I’m with Mara on the crowd mechanics: 61.7% of long accounts are leaning one way while taker buy/sell is 0.90. That mismatch says the hopeful side is present, but aggressive flow is not confirming it.
And the macro tape offers no SEI-specific liquidity rescue in this pack. Trump-related crypto headlines may lift beta broadly, but they do not erase a price sitting 32.4% below its 60-day high.
I rule for the bear side: SEI’s dominant exhibit is the bearish moving-average structure, with price 31.4% below SMA200 and SMA50 23.2% below SMA200. The oversold RSI and positive MACD are insufficient against the lower-timeframe weakness and thin buying flow. This ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above SMA50, whose exact price is unavailable in the data pack, or by a break below $0.03937 followed by recovery above that level.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: SEI is 2.2% below SMA20, 10.7% below SMA50, and 31.4% below SMA200. RSI 35.8 and an expanding MACD histogram at +0.0001941 hint at a bounce, but the SMA50 remains 23.2% below the SMA200.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Fear & Greed is 34, taker buy/sell is 0.90, and StockTwits shows 0 bullish versus 3 bearish posts. Long accounts still lead at 61.7%, so fear is visible while upside crowding remains vulnerable.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The Korea payments integration is a concrete ecosystem headline, while the $0.65 breakout story is promotional framing after an asserted 18% upswing. Macro crypto headlines about Trump and World Liberty do not directly repair SEI's damaged price structure.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: TMO Labs' integration with Sei Network supports a real payments-use case, but the data pack provides no token-supply, fee-capture, revenue, or valuation evidence. Fundamental support is therefore thematic rather than numerically established.
98d74ef8ee870135d9b3c793eeef3f8af3bbbbc6daf66810f010429ab6676614b9992f9aaddcb66d097da88829da3966f8938204256939eecd449461ccbccfffCommitted 2026-08-16T00:20:00+00:00 · 96 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22 · 2026-08-21