SEI / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SEI’s 0.0464 rebound runs into a bearish SMA50/SMA200 spread of -21.9%
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-26 01:00 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — +1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -8.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -2.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -7.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -5.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -4.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained move above 0.05157 with MACD histogram expansion would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.03819 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo’s springboard is already coughing: the 24-hour move is -2.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo’s springboard is already coughing: the 24-hour move is -2. Key support to defend sits near $0.03819. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: SMA50 sits 21.9% below SMA200. But price has ripped 12.6% in seven days, stands 9.1% above SMA20, and the 0.03819 low is now 21.5% underneath—this looks like a springboard, not a corpse. The old bearish structure is stale if momentum can press toward 0.05157.
Leo’s springboard is already coughing: the 24-hour move is -2.213%, MACD histogram is shrinking at +0.0008608, and takers are net selling with a 0.94 buy/sell ratio. His 12.6% burst is precisely the sort of relief rally that traps crowded longs when 63.3% of accounts lean long. Until SEI clears 0.05157, the rebound is evidence of overhead supply, not escape.
· Momentum continuation after the 12.6% seven-day gain
· Adoption headlines around Mastercard and tokenized stocks
· Short-term squeeze from the 0.0464 base
Invalidation: A sustained move above 0.05157 with MACD histogram expansion would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, you’re treating 0.94 taker flow as a verdict when RSI is still 59.7 and price holds 5.2% above SMA50. A pullback after +12.6% in seven days is normal digestion.
Leo, digestion doesn’t explain why price remains 17.8% below SMA200. Your “normal pullback” thesis fails if the contracting MACD is the first crack in a rally already facing the 0.05157 ceiling.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating 0.94 taker flow as a verdict when RSI is still 59.7 and price holds 5.2% above SMA50. A pullback after +12.6% in seven days is normal digestion.
Leo, digestion doesn’t explain why price remains 17.8% below SMA200. Your “normal pullback” thesis fails if the contracting MACD is the first crack in a rally already facing the 0.05157 ceiling.
I’m with Mara on the crowd: Fear&Greed is 65, the L/S ratio is 1.73, and longs are 63.3%. Funding is absent, so nobody gets to invent a financing tailwind; the observable flow is taker buy/sell at 0.94.
Leo, the macro headlines may help the sector, but they don’t repair SEI’s moving-average regime. A 21.9% SMA50-under-SMA200 gap is a liquidity-weather warning, and the market is still 10.0% below the 60-day high.
I rule for the bears: SEI is underweight on the decisive exhibit of a 21.9% bearish SMA50/SMA200 spread, reinforced by 63.3% long accounts and a 0.94 taker buy/sell ratio. The ruling is overturned by a sustained move above 0.05157, especially if MACD histogram expansion resumes.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: RSI(14) 59.7; price vs SMA20 +9.1% and SMA50 +5.2%; price vs SMA200 -17.8%; SMA50 vs SMA200 -21.9%; MACD histogram +0.0008608 but contracting; 60d high 0.05157 and low 0.03819. Conflicts: 7d gain of 12.6% and 30d gain of 10.3% oppose the longer-term moving-average structure. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear&Greed 65 (Greed); 63.3% long accounts; L/S ratio 1.73; taker buy/sell 0.94. Conflicts: StockTwits supplied no messages, so there is no usable social confirmation. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The headlines are constructive—Mastercard, tokenized stocks, Korean payments, and a possible Giga upgrade—but they describe adoption narratives, not a verified earnings or usage inflection. The broader banking-blockchain stories add sector validation, yet nothing in the pack proves SEI can reclaim 0.05157.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: Mastercard and tokenized-stock expansion, plus TMO Labs’ Korean payments integration, point to a credible application pipeline. But the pack provides no token-supply, valuation, revenue, or on-chain usage figures, so fundamentals cannot outweigh the -17.8% discount to SMA200.
8088caa5ca2cf7fc7309d67b5f80043d0917034f1a148e5cc3b5b214287709ba650479c8d662b50f512b6a5ccfb1242fb411c562a0dabecc0eed582b87132f9fCommitted 2026-08-27T00:20:00+00:00 · 93 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22 · 2026-08-21