SEI / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SEI at $0.04817 faces a bearish structure despite a firmer MACD histogram
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-16 00:51 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — +0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Neutral — -2.0% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -5.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -6.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — +1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -8.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -2.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -3.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -7.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -5.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -4.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.052 or RSI above 50 would invalidate the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.04441 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that spark hasn’t moved the price: SEI is still 1.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that spark hasn’t moved the price: SEI is still 1. Key support to defend sits near $0.04441. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number, Mara: SEI is 31.1% below its SMA200 and down 11.9% over 30 days. But RSI at 42.9 is bruised rather than washed out, and the MACD histogram is expanding at +0.0001531; that’s the first spark in a dark room, with extreme fear at 25 already pricing plenty of despair.
Leo, that spark hasn’t moved the price: SEI is still 1.5% below its SMA20, 8.9% below its SMA50, and the 50-day average trails the 200-day by 24.3%. Your positive MACD histogram is a countertrend twitch, not a reversal, especially with taker buy/sell at 0.90 and price hovering just 8.5% above $0.04441.
· MACD-driven relief rally
· Extreme-fear reversal
· Institutional tokenization spillover
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.052 or RSI above 50 would invalidate the bearish ruling.
Mara, you’re treating the 60-day low at $0.04441 like a magnet. Extreme fear at 25 and RSI 42.9 leave room for a relief rally before that level is tested.
Leo, relief rallies still need demand. Long accounts are already 55.8%, yet takers sell more aggressively than they buy at 0.90; that’s weak sponsorship, not hidden strength.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating the 60-day low at $0.04441 like a magnet. Extreme fear at 25 and RSI 42.9 leave room for a relief rally before that level is tested.
Leo, relief rallies still need demand. Long accounts are already 55.8%, yet takers sell more aggressively than they buy at 0.90; that’s weak sponsorship, not hidden strength.
Leo, I’ll back the positioning read only halfway: 55.8% longs and a 1.26 ratio are not a clean contrarian washout. Without funding data, I can’t claim shorts are paying for this setup—or that longs are trapped enough to guarantee a squeeze.
I’m with Mara on the regime. SEI sits 34.2% below the 60-day high of $0.07318, and the pack offers no macro-liquidity catalyst capable of repairing that broader downtrend.
I rule for the bears, and the single decisive exhibit is SEI’s position 31.1% below the SMA200 alongside the bearish 50/200-day spread of 24.3%. I would overturn this ruling on a sustained reclaim of $0.052 or an RSI reading above 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a damaged chart: SEI sits 8.9% below its SMA50 and 31.1% below its SMA200, while the 50/200-day structure is bearish by 24.3%. RSI 42.9 and an expanding MACD histogram of +0.0001531 offer a bounce setup, but price remains only 8.5% above the 60-day low at $0.04441.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I read fear, not capitulation: Fear & Greed is 25, yet long accounts still hold 55.8% with a 1.26 long/short ratio. The 0.90 taker buy/sell ratio says buyers aren't pressing, so crowded longs can still become fuel for another flush.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I see a split tape in the headlines. Tokenized securities entering live trading through DTCC, plus Cantor and Securitize's blockchain IPO collaboration, supports the sector narrative; the $18 million Ostium exploit keeps the security discount brutally relevant, while Coinbase's Jesse Pollak step-back adds no direct SEI catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I find no SEI-specific fundamental catalyst in this pack. The strongest sector-level development is institutional tokenization, but it does not establish SEI adoption, revenue, or token-demand growth.
89cf724006ddd4e091dd3e44745ca90b92d2cd7917618d4a8261292afc52a0c96da543ec34b237c483d95fc9d70813ee7d11bb2d47e02a9a1b3e1847a4282badCommitted 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 67 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-23