FIL / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
FIL’s bearish structure points lower from $0.7459, with RSI at 42.5 and support near $0.668
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-19 06:29 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A+
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — +8.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — +8.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — +6.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -13.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -12.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Neutral — -13.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -7.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -7.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +5.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +4.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — +1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +2.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -7.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -3.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim of $0.800 with RSI above 50 would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.668 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that is exactly the hopium arithmetic: calling a contracting negative MACD a floor while price remains below every major moving average.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that is exactly the hopium arithmetic: calling a contracting negative MACD a floor while price remains below every major moving average. Key support to defend sits near $0.668. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number, Mara: FIL sits 23.7% under its SMA200, and the 60-day high at $1.099 is a distant 32.1% above us. But RSI is 42.5, not capitulation, the MACD histogram is contracting, and fear at 28 can become rocket fuel once sellers run out of ammunition.
Leo, that is exactly the hopium arithmetic: calling a contracting negative MACD a floor while price remains below every major moving average. FIL is down 3.3% over seven days and 5.7% over thirty, while takers buy at just 0.78 versus sellers—your “fuel” is still leaking out of the tank.
· Fear-driven short-term rebound
· Breakdown below $0.668
· No funding-rate confirmation
Invalidation: A sustained reclaim of $0.800 with RSI above 50 would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, the 60-day low is $0.668, only 11.7% below spot, so the downside is already compressed against a defined floor. A fear reading of 28 makes bad news crowded, not fresh.
Leo, “only” 11.7% is a large drawdown for a token already below SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200. The 54.4% long-account share says dip buyers are positioned to become forced sellers if $0.668 breaks.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day low is $0.668, only 11.7% below spot, so the downside is already compressed against a defined floor. A fear reading of 28 makes bad news crowded, not fresh.
Leo, “only” 11.7% is a large drawdown for a token already below SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200. The 54.4% long-account share says dip buyers are positioned to become forced sellers if $0.668 breaks.
I’m with Mara on the flow tape: the 1.20 long/short account ratio is modestly long, but taker buy/sell at 0.78 shows immediate execution pressure favors sellers. No funding-rate data means nobody gets to invent a squeeze.
Leo’s relief-rally case needs liquidity to breathe, and this pack offers no macro catalyst for FIL. A coin 32.1% below its 60-day high with a bearish moving-average stack is not my preferred place to wager on benevolent liquidity.
I award the bear side: the single decisive exhibit is taker buy/sell at 0.78, reinforced by FIL trading 23.7% below SMA200. My ruling is overturned only if FIL reclaims $0.800 while RSI rises above 50; until then, the $0.668 low is the pressure point.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: Bearish. FIL trades 3.2% below SMA20, 4.6% below SMA50, and 23.7% below SMA200; the SMA50 sits 20.0% beneath the SMA200. RSI at 42.5 and a contracting negative MACD histogram of -0.0004431 offer no reversal confirmation.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Bearish. Fear & Greed is 28, taker buy/sell is only 0.78, and the 54.4% long-account share creates a crowded dip-buying vulnerability. The 1.20 long/short account ratio conflicts with the weak taker flow, making longs look more hopeful than aggressive.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: Neutral. The headlines focus on Zcash privacy, Polymarket regulation, digital-native banking, Bitcoin governance, and Brazil’s payments system rather than FIL-specific catalysts. Nothing in the pack supplies a credible near-term narrative to counter FIL’s weak tape.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: Neutral. The data pack provides no FIL-specific revenue, storage-demand, supply, or token-economics figures. Without those exhibits, fundamentals cannot justify a bullish rerating.
668a92f0dd4d1019023bc339a7aac6998c375614558fc3f41f2e5cf88edfbd90f4fc7312c5be5f7d7eea56f69a8be2b8607d9ddd9672db388d49defd4b1498d1Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 67 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-24