FIL / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
FIL rallies 10.0% in 24 hours, but remains 14.0% below its SMA200
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-21 00:54 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -13.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -12.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Neutral — -13.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -7.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +3.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -7.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +5.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +4.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — +1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +2.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -7.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -3.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The neutral recovery thesis is invalidated by a break below 0.6076; a sustained move above 0.817 would instead resolve the structure bullishly.. Cautious read: a break below $0.6076 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo’s 10.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Mixed, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo’s 10. Key support to defend sits near $0.6076. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number: FIL sits 14.0% under the SMA200, with the SMA50 still 15.7% below it. But the tape just punched 10.0% higher in 24 hours, MACD is expanding at +0.007151, and price is above both the SMA20 and SMA50; that’s a spark becoming a flame, not stale weakness. My earlier underweight calls on August 8, which lost 3.8% versus BTC, and August 13, which won by 8.1%, prove the old bearish script isn’t automatically current—the present momentum evidence is materially stronger.
Leo’s 10.0% burst is exactly the number hopium wants framed as a regime change, but FIL is still 14.0% below the SMA200 and the long-term average structure remains bearish by 15.7%. A move above short averages can be a dead-cat bounce while the 60-day high at 0.817 remains 8.9% away. The August 8 underweight loss of 3.8% versus BTC shows bearish calls can fail, but it does not turn one green day into a durable trend reversal.
I see more upside than this ruling admits: FIL is only at 0.7442 against a 0.817 60-day high, while RSI is a moderate 57.8 and the 7-day gain is 9.3%. The recent August 8 underweight call lost 3.8% versus BTC, evidence that downside framing can lag a sharp rebound.
The fastest failure is a reversal from greed at 72 while 54.8% of long accounts and a 1.21 L/S ratio lean the same way. The fragile exhibit is the expanding MACD histogram at +0.007151, because it depends on the recent burst holding despite FIL remaining 14.0% below the SMA200.
The aggressive desk overreaches by treating a 10.0% daily move as structural, while the conservative desk overreaches by treating the long-term bearish spread as immediately decisive. The deciding condition is whether FIL breaks and holds 0.817 or instead loses 0.6076; the settled record’s August 8 underweight loss of 3.8% versus BTC argues against reflexively repeating the old call.
· Greed at 72 and long-account crowding
· Bearish SMA50/SMA200 structure
· Broad-market rebound lacking a FIL-specific catalyst
Invalidation: The neutral recovery thesis is invalidated by a break below 0.6076; a sustained move above 0.817 would instead resolve the structure bullishly.
Leo, your +10.0% is a one-day receipt, not proof of a new trend; the 30-day return is still -2.4%.
Mara, the 7-day return is already +9.3%, RSI is only 57.8, and MACD is expanding—momentum has room before overheating.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Leo, your +10.0% is a one-day receipt, not proof of a new trend; the 30-day return is still -2.4%.
Mara, the 7-day return is already +9.3%, RSI is only 57.8, and MACD is expanding—momentum has room before overheating.
I’m siding with the tape only provisionally: 54.8% of long accounts and a 1.21 L/S ratio show bullish crowding, while taker buy/sell at 1.00 shows no aggressive demand imbalance.
And the macro rebound can evaporate with the headline cycle; until FIL clears 0.817, the market is paying for relief, not liquidity-proof strength.
I rule for a neutral stance with a mixed, short-term bullish-to-recovery bias. The decisive exhibit is the clash between +10.0% 24-hour momentum and the still-bearish 15.7% SMA50/SMA200 spread. The ruling is overturned if FIL falls below 0.6076, or strengthened materially by a sustained break above 0.817.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: mixed. Evidence families: RSI(14) 57.8, MACD histogram +0.007151 and expanding, price +6.9% vs SMA20 and +2.0% vs SMA50; conflicts: price remains 14.0% below SMA200 and SMA50 trails SMA200 by 15.7%; sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear&Greed 72, long accounts 54.8% with L/S ratio 1.21, taker buy/sell 1.00; conflicts: only 2 StockTwits messages, tagged 1 bullish and 0 bearish; sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The headline impulse is broad-market recovery, with Filecoin reported surging 5%, while AI-contract coverage highlights valuation pressure on pure-play miners. The CFTC regulation story and Treasury-buyback speculation support a wider crypto rebound, not a FIL-specific fundamental catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Filecoin's pack offers no fresh token-economics or network-growth figures to justify a durable rerating. The AI-contract and miner-valuation headlines are relevant context, but they do not establish that FIL can reclaim its 0.817 60-day high.
4f6c2824ee017358787ed572b1d7821802e9a6af566e933afc385037ac8f6eae5c21c070ba128f2a35607134962360a82f87d1bc3398b693184c1393829130b0Committed 2026-08-22T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22